Tag Archives: English

(es-en) Unas notas sobre las recientes difamaciones y breve aclaración

Contundente respuesta desde Animus Delendi tras la mierda dicha por un miserable cobarde inglés del colectivo electrónico 325.
¡Fuerza a los individualistas en Guerra!
¡Por la conspiración internacional homicida y salvaje!
*Texto también disponible en inglés.


Nosotros no somos ITS, no vamos a hablar en su nombre pero ya que en su mierda bravucona de escrito y de blog mencionan un texto escrito por algunos de los nuestros, atacan y difaman posiciones y tendencias que defendemos con orgullo, entre otras cosas, nos vemos obligados a intervenir y aclarar varias cosas:

1) Lo primero es que nosotros siempre hemos estado y estamos dispuestos a intercambiar críticas, opiniones y desacuerdos con otros grupos e individualidades siempre dentro de unos límites, pero en este texto (tanto tiempo para escribir reverenda mierda, que decepción) encontramos los mismos clichés, el insulto barato y la misma basura “copy paste” que se viene dando últimamente. Este tipo de crítica tan absurda basada en idioteces ideológicas nos da lo mismo, pero esperamos con esto dejar, si no cerrado el tema por nuestra parte, al menos todo bien claro. Lo nuestro no es divagar con retrasados mentales por internet. Toda esta mierda de textos nos asquea y no vamos a seguir el absurdo juego,entre nosotros y vosotros no hay nada más que hablar, ya está todo dicho. Vosotros estáis en un extremo y nosotros en el extremo opuesto.

2) Que un individuo que se auto-posiciona, entre otros términos, como “nihilista” haga un análisis tan moralista y pedante, propio de un buen izquierdista-cristiano ya lo dice todo. Curioso que años atrás estos mismos anarquistas “nihilistas” eran sujeto de duras críticas, difamación y condena por parte de los anarco-sociales, con el paso del tiempo estos han tomado el testigo para hacer de juez, jurado y verdugo. Ah, por cierto ya que mencionas que has llevado a cabo acciones por la defensa de la tierra, te respondemos que la tierra no necesita defensores, la tierra y lo salvaje ya tiene sus propios mecanismos de defensa, regulación y venganza, la típica actitud anarquista: antropocentrista e intervencionista en la cual él debe de ser el salvador/liberador de todo.

3) Si se molestaran en leer antes de escribir cualquier mierda que se les pasa por la cabeza, verían que las primeras ITS comenzaron a partir de cierto punto a cuestionar los valores del anarquismo (entre otras cosas), esto suponemos como fruto de un desarrollo individual y/o colectivo de sus integrantes, y a clarificar que no eran anarquistas, debido a que constantemente les etiquetaban como grupo anarquista. Desde ese momento (e incluso de antes) el “ámbito” anarco no ha dejado de tirar mierda a diestra y siniestra contra ITS (esto se intensificó en la etapa de RS) y cualquiera que mostrase simpatía hacia ellos, esta manía inquisitoria se ha mantenido hasta el día de hoy.

4) De nuevo los mismos argumentos… que si fascistas, neonazis, machistas, homófobos, reaccionarios, racistas, nacionalistas, sexistas, misóginos… que tan típico del izquierdista: todo el que no es como yo, es un Hitler en potencia. A ver si va a ser verdad que en el fondo lo que les molesta es que desde hace años un grupo desprendido de sus círculos ha creado su propio camino, al cual cada vez más anarquistas (especialmente de la tendencia insurreccional y eco-anarquista/anti-civilización) se están acercando, alejándose de los valores humanistas y caducos de la anarquía y de su mierda de movimiento, y aunque no se definan como eco-extremistas, están empezando a crear su propio camino caótico y destructivo al margen de las santas escrituras de lo políticamente (y “anarquístamente”) correcto.

5) Luego se habla de que los atentados y asesinatos indiscriminados tienen resultado únicamente autoritario… ¿ dime que asesinato es “anti-autoritario”? cuando el acto de quitar la vida a otro ser viviente es en sí ponerte por encima de él, otorgarte el derecho a matar algo vivo, darte a ti mismo la autoridad de decidir acabar con su existencia… pero claro todo está justificado si la causa por la cual se mata es la que a ti te conviene…
¿Somos elitistas? sí, lo somos, sin duda, precisamente para no acabar como la FAI, o peor aun, como los anarquistas del Reino Unido, pero luego hablaremos de eso…
Según este personaje, el terrorismo indiscriminado le hace juego al sistema ya que, según él, el sistema tecno-industrial y la civilización buscan un modelo de convivencia basado en el conflicto, incentivando el odio, la desconfianza, que las personas se maten las unas a las otras… Si esto es cierto, entonces preguntamos: ¿para que demonios el sistema gasta millones campañas publicitarias en TV, la escuela etc., haciendo esfuerzo en inculcar los valores de la tolerancia, el respeto, el civismo…etc?, ¿ por que hay toda una serie de códigos de conducta civilizados, de normas morales y jurídicas impuestas?, ¿por qué el sistema necesita de armas, ejércitos, policías, sistema punitivos y al mismo tiempo caga de miedo al ciudadano con la amenaza de la prisión si no cumple con lo establecido?, ¿por que el sistema cada vez trata de reformarse, de volverse más “humano”, más inclusivo, de eliminar desigualdades (laborales, de género, de raza…)?, ¿realmente piensas que el sistema se beneficia mas de una sociedad conflictiva, caótica y canibalizada donde sus ciudadanos se matan los unos a los otros, o por el contrario de una sociedad donde todo funciona suavemente, en armonía y paz social?

6) Ya que comentas los ataques de Manchester y Londres, así como el incendio de la Torre Grenfell (¡un “nihilista” con conciencia de clases!, ¿preparando el terreno para la jubilación en el SWP como muchos de tus antiguos camaradas?), lo primero que debes tener claro esa que no vamos a llorar por unos cuantos civilizados muertos, mas bien nos regocijamos.
Nosotros desde luego no idealizamos ni adoramos fetichísticamente a Daesh ni a nadie, lo que no quita que no podamos aprender de sus métodos y tomar lo que consideramos positivo para nuestros fines. Punto.
Eso de adorar fetichísticamente se lo dejamos para los anarcos, tal como hacen sobre todo con lo que venga del anarquismo griego o de CCF, o de la guerra civil española, o simplemente masturbarse viendo videos de molotovs volando sobre antidisturbios y esas cosas.
Por cierto que Daesh, ya que estamos con el tema, no hace nada que los anarquistas del pasado no hayan hecho, lo que varía son las motivaciones y, en algunos casos, los métodos:
Han acribillado y ejecutado policías, han detonado explosivos en restaurantes llenos de “burgueses” en el centro de París (tal como hiciera un tal Emile Henry), han asesinado sacerdotes y otros religiosos (tal como hicieran los anarquistas en el guerra civil española o como el atentado indiscriminado de la procesión del Corpus Christi en Barcelona)…
También han arrollado a una multitud de viandantes que celebraban el día nacional de Francia ¡una fiesta patriótica!, entonces según su lógica de entender el mundo ¡esos viandantes debían ser fascistas!

7) Vaya, se molestaron por las advertencias al cretino gringo, simplemente “por molestarse a hacerles una crítica pública”… Supongo que recordarán cuando su querida CCF apaleó a otro anarquista preso por discrepar y criticarles…

8) Luego de un montón de estupideces más, dan información concreta sobre una persona (como su supuesta nacionalidad), y la relacionan con un nombre usado en la reivindicación de acciones… sea esta información verdadera o falsa esto no es nada accidental ni inocente, si no un cobarde acto premeditado… esto tiene un nombre claro y es SER UN MISERABLE CHIVATO.

9) A ustedes en sus blogs de mierda,quizás debido a la prácticamente total falta de acciones anárquicas en su zona, gustan de incluir noticias del mundo criminal (asaltos a joyerías, robos de bancos…etc), vandalismo llevado a cabo por eso que denominan “juventud salvaje” así como asuntos del mundo carcelario (fugas, ataques a carceleros, motines)… Si tuvieran un mínimo contacto con el mundo criminal/carcelario o se dieran una vuelta por uno de esos barrios de “juventud salvaje” ya se darían cuenta de cuanto les separa, intenten hablarse a esta gente de anarquía y de anti-autoritarismos y a ver que pasa… de nuevo idealizando lo que no conocen, desde la comodidad que da sentarse tras una pantalla. El mundo criminal/carcelario está bien marcado por las jerarquías, la ley del más fuerte, las “desigualdades”, el machismo/sexismo/homofóbia y todas esas cosas que tanto detestan y que tanto se oponen a sus valores, lo que sí comparten con el mundo del anarquismo es su infiltración por informantes y colaboradores. Por cierto,¿saben que les ocurre a los chivatos y bocazas en los ambientes criminales/carcelarios?.
En fin, suponemos que tienen que poner alguna noticia jugosa de cuando en cuando para no quedar en ridículo, sólo hace falta echar un vistazo al movimiento en su isla, “acciones” consistentes en sellar candados , rajar ruedas, hacer graffiti o…. ¡sabotear bicicletas! ¡alerta! ¡la insurrección ha comenzado! ¡JA!

10) En otro texto se habla de FAI y de lo odioso que le ha resultado el texto “el mito anarquista”, y se nos recomienda leer las teorías, debates y praxis de la FAI, y mas concretamente de la CCF.

Vamos a aclarar otra cosa cosa: Quienes escriben esto, en su día fueron parte de ese entramado de células e individuos que fue FAI/IRF, y reivindicaron acciones bajo estas siglas, así que sabemos de lo que hablamos, no tenemos que aprender nada nuevo de aquellos escritos porque hemos sido parte de ese intercambio teórico-práctico. Tanto que les gusta recomendar que leamos a sus ídolos de CCF, ustedes de nuevo idealizan de lo que no conocen, si supieran cuanta mierda hubo y hay en torno a ciertos individuos y células de FAI, como la CCF, que van escribiendo textos dando lecciones para después hacer todo lo contrario. Si vamos a hablar de jerarquías informales, de roles de poder, de hipocresía, de utilizar a gente y luego joderles la vida y cagadas MONUMENTALES… entonces estamos hablando de CCF/FAI.

Si algo hemos aprendido de aquellos días (y pueden creernos, aprendimos bastante) ha sido lo positivo de la organización y coordinación informal (entre otras cosas), pero también de sus errores, de toda la MIERDA y del desastre que supuso al final. FAI y CCF, son el ejemplo de lo que NO se debe hacer, la historia y el resultado lo confirman.
El mejor ejemplo es ver lo que era FAI hace unos años y lo que es ahora, con grupos tomando “responsabilidad” por poner carteles y mariconadas activistas de ese estilo.

11) Se sienten muy valientes insultando e “invitando” a ITS a ir a buscarles a su isla de mierda, dado que saben de sobra que eso no va a ocurrir, de todas formas les vamos a recordar ahora nosotros una cosa:
Aquí en Europa también hay grupúsculos de terroristas nihilistas, criminales individualistas y extremistas misántropos vivos y pateando, y recordamos de nuevo que algunos de esos grupúsculos fueron hasta hace un tiempo cercanos a ustedes y sus ambiente de podredumbre, que sabemos quién es quién y donde se mueve cada cual, que la violencia y el atentado para nosotros no es algo novedoso, si no una práctica que se ha convertido en una extensión de su propio ser, en tanto ha sido parte de nuestra vida desde hace años ya… nosotros no tenemos “deidades paganas” lo que sí tenemos son armas, explosivos e información…Así que vigilen sus palabras, sus valentías de internet pueden salir caras en la vida real.

¡La guerra continúa!

E.E.I 

_____________________________________

A few notes on recent slandering and brief clarification.

We are not ITS, we are not going to speak in their name but since in your boastfull shitty text and blog you mention a text written by some of us, attack and calumniate positions and tendencies that we defend with pride, among other things, we feel obliged to intervene and clarify several things:

1) The first thing is that we have always been and are willing to exchange criticism, opinions and disagreements with other groups and individuals always within some limits, but in this text (you take so much time to write such a crap, what a disappointment) we find the same clichés, the cheap insult and the same “copy & paste” garbage that has been happening lately. We don´t give a damn about  this kind of so absurd criticism based on ideological idiocy, but we hope with this to leave, if not closed this topic on our part, at least everything clear. We have better things to do than losing our time with retards on the net. All of this bullshit texts disgust us and we will not continue playing this nonsense game, between us there is no more space for talking as nothing else remains to talk. You are on one side and we are on the opposite.

2) That an individual who is self-defined, among other terms, as a “nihilist” does such a moralistic and pedantic analysis, typical of a good Christian-leftist says it all by itself. Curious that years ago these same “nihilist” anarchists were subject to harsh criticism, slander and condemnation by the social anarchists, with the pass of time they have taken their role to become judge, jury and executioner. Ah, by the way since you mention that you have carried out actions for the defense of the earth, we answer you that the land does not need defenders, the land and the wild already has its own mechanisms of defense, regulation and revenge, the typical attitude of the anarchist: anthropocentric and interventionist in which he must be the savior / liberator of everything.

3) If you bothered to read before writing any shit that goes through your heads, you would see that the first ITS started from a certain point to question the values of anarchism (among other things), this we suppose as the result of a Individual and / or collective development of its members, and to clarify that they were not anarchists, because they were constantly labeled as an anarchist group. Since then (and even before) the anarcho “scope” has not stopped throwing shit against ITS (this intensified in the RS stage) and anyone who showed sympathy towards them, this inquisitorial madness has been maintained until today.

4) Again the same arguments … fascists, neo-Nazis, machos, homophobes, reactionary, racist, nationalist, sexist, misogynist … so typical of the leftist: anyone who is not like me is a potential Hitler. Finally it looks to be true that what really bothers you is that since years ago a group detached from your circles has created its own path, to which more and more anarchists (especially from the insurrectional and eco-anarchist/anti-civilization tendency) are approaching, moving away from the humanistic and outdated values of anarchy and its shit movement, and even if they do not define themselves as eco-extremists, they are starting to create their own chaotic and destructive path apart from the holy scriptures of the political (and anarchist) correctness.

5) Then it is said that the indiscriminate attacks and murders have only authoritarian outcomes… tell me what murder is “anti-authoritarian”? The act of taking the life of another living being means putting you above him/her, granting you the right to kill something alive, giving yourself the authority to decide to end its existence… but of course everything is justified if the cause for what is killed is the one that suits you…
Are we elitist? Yes, we are, certainly, precisely so as not to end up as the FAI, or worse, like the anarchists of the United Kingdom, but we will talk about that later…
According to this character, indiscriminate terrorism benefits the system because, according to him, the techno-industrial system and civilization seek a model of coexistence based on the conflict, encouraging hatred, mistrust, murders… If this is true, then we ask: why the system spends millions on propaganda campaigns on TV, school, etc. making an effort to instill the values ​​of tolerance, respect, civility … etc? Why is there a whole series of civilized codes of conduct, of moral and legal norms imposed? Why does the system need weapons, armies, police, punitive system and at the same time scare the shit out of the citizens with the threat of prison if he does not comply with what is established? Why is the system increasingly trying to reform itself, to become more “human”, more inclusive, to eliminate inequalities (labor, gender, race …)? Do you really think that the system benefits more from a conflictive, chaotic and cannibalized society where its citizens kill each other, or on the contrary of a society where everything works smoothly, in harmony and social peace?

6) As you mention the attacks of Manchester and London, as well as the fire of the Grenfell Tower (a “nihilist” with class consciousness! setting the stage for your retirement in the SWP as many of your former comrades did? ), The first thing you must be clear that we will not mourn for a few civilized dead, rather we rejoice.Period.
We certainly do not idealize or fetishistically worship Daesh or anyone, which does not mean that we can not learn from their methods and take what we consider positive for our purposes.
That fetishistic worship we leave to you anarchists, as you do especially with what comes from Greek anarchism or CCF, or the Spanish civil war, or just masturbate watching videos of Molotovs flying over riot cops and stuff.
By the way, Daesh, since we are on the subject, does nothing that the anarchists of the past have not done, what varies are the motivations and, in some cases, the methods:
They have shoot and executed cops, blow up restaurants full of “bourgeois” in the center of Paris (as Emile Henry did), have murdered priests and other religious (as did the anarchists in the Spanish civil war or as the indiscriminate bombing in the procession of Corpus Christi in Barcelona)…
They have also run over a crowd of bystanders who celebrated the national day of France, a patriotic celebration! Then according to your logic of understanding the world, those bystanders should be fascists!

7) Well, you were concerned by the warnings to that cretinous gringo, just for ” bother to publically criticise them” … I suppose you will remember when your beloved CCF beat up another anarchist prisoner for disagreeing and criticizing them…

8) After a lot more of stupid things, you give specific information about a person (such as supposed nationality) and related this person with a name used in the claims of actions… even if this info is true or not… this is not an accidental or innocent act, this is a coward and premedited act…this has a clear name and is TO BE A MISERABLE SNITCH.

9) In your shitty blogs, perhaps due to the virtually total lack of anarchic actions in your area, like to include news from the criminal world (assaults to jewelry stores, robberies of banks … etc) vandalism carried out for that which they call “wild youth” as well as prison affairs (escapes, attacks on screws, prison riots) … If you had minimal contact with the criminal / prison world or took a tour of one of those neighborhoods of “wild youth” you would realize how much stand between you and them, try to speak to these people of anarchy and anti-authoritarianism and let´s see what happens … again idealizing what you don´t know, from the comfort of those who sits behind a screen. The criminal / prison world is well characterized by hierarchies, the law of the strongest, “inequalities”, machismo / sexism / homophobia and all those things that you hate so much and oppose your values, what they share with the world of anarchism is its infiltration by informants and collaborators. By the way, did you know what happens to snitches and big mouths in the criminal/prison environment?.
In short, we suppose that they have to put some juicy news from time to time so as not to look ridiculous, you just need to take a look at the movement on your island, “actions” consisting of sealing padlocks, slashing tires, graffiti or … To sabotage bikes! alert! The insurrection has begun! LOL!

10) Another text speaks of FAI and how disgusting the text “The anarchist myth” has been and we are advised to read the theories, debates and praxis of the FAI, and more specifically of the CCF.

Let’s clarify something else: Those who write this, back in the day were part of that network of cells and individuals that was FAI / IRF, and claimed actions under these acronyms, so we know what we are talking about, we do not have to learn anything new of those writings because we have been part of that theoretical-practical exchange. So much that you like to recommend us to read your idols of CCF, you again idealize what you do not know, if you knew how much shit there was and there are around certain individuals and cells of FAI, like the CCF, who are writing texts giving lessons and then they do the opposite of what they preach. If we are going to talk about informal hierarchies, power roles, hypocrisy, using people and then fuck-up them and HUGE mistakes… then we are talking about CCF / FAI.

If we have learned something from those days (and you can believe us, we learned a lot) it has been the positive thing of the informal organization and coordination (among other things), but also of its mistakes, of all the SHIT and of the disaster that was in its end. FAI and CCF, are the example of what NOT to do, the history and the result confirm it.
The best example is to see what FAI was a few years ago and what it is now, with groups taking “responsibility” for putting up posters and fagoty activism of that style.

11) You feel very tough disrespecting and “inviting” ITS to go find you in your shitty island, since you know that is not going to happen, anyway we are going to remind you one thing:
Here in Europe there are also groups of nihilist terrorists, individualistic criminals and extremist misanthropes who are alive and kicking, and we remind you again that some of these groups were until a while ago close to you and your rotten environment, we know who is who and where hang out each one, the violence and the attack for us is not something new, but a practice that has become an extension of our own being, since it has been part of our life for years already… we do not have “pagan gods” what we have are weapons, explosives and information… So watch your words, your internet bravery can be expensive in real life.

The war keeps going on!

E.E.I

[es-en] (Argentina) Ex-anarquistas salvajizados reivindican ataque a institución farmacéutica

Recibimos con todo el gusto criminal esta adjudicación de parte de unos ex-anarquistas desde Argentina.

¡Alentando a más piedras, bombas, incendios y asesinatos, porque la Guerra Individualista continúa viva!

*TRADUCIDO AL INGLÉS POR ANIMUS DELENDI.


Ante acontecimientos pasados y no tan pasados, nos decidimos al final a usar este medio para expresar nuestras acciones y motivaciones.

Hace unas semanas largas, reventamos con piedras la fachada de una institución Farmacéutica y de algunos otros locales que no vamos a nombrar acá.

No habíamos ni pensado en reivindicarlo al principio, pero viendo el alboroto que se sucede en el mundo de la internet decidimos posicionarnos.

Aquí, en “Buenos Aires”, hace harto que no suena un estruendo anárquico digno de sus antepasados políticos, todo sabemos las que liaron acá los anarquistas en su momento y no hace falta recordarlo.

Los anarquistas de ahora hablan y hablan, se juntan en sus asambleas para tomar grandes decisiones, y hacer sus pequeñas ferias del libro y esas cosas. Aquí y allá, a lo largo del mundo, la revuelta anárquica insurreccional parece estar finalmente apagándose, parece que no “mantuvieron la llama prendida” como tanto les gustaba decir. Ya se van viendo los últimos manotazos del ahogado a forma de crítica y difamaciones a los que SI hacen.

Nosotras y nosotros, desde este pequeño rejunte de individuos recorrimos de arriba a abajo sus espacios, conocimos a todos sus personajes, compartimos largas charlas y asambleas con ellos luchando por cambiar un mundo en el que ya no vemos salvación.

Fue tanto que nos cansamos y fue hasta que leímos aquellas palabras llenas de provocación y orgullo, de ese que tenían los guerreros, hablamos de Its. Ahí si nos envalentonamos! Nos encantó leer por fin a personas sin moralina, sin tanta hipocresía y balbuceo filantrópico.

No necesitamos decirnos eco-extremistas para saber que aquellos que sí lo hacen, están del mismo bando que nosotros.

Frente a semejante oleada de ataques que están lanzando estos grupos, inclusive acá en argentina, con los incendios a autos, trenes, colectivos e iglesias que nos hicieron brincar de emoción, sentimos imperiosamente salir a dejar lo nuestro también. Si, si, unas piedras y unos cristales rotos es poco, pero nos queda la experiencia, para nosotros fue muchísimo porque sabemos el impulso de nuestro interior que guía la bella violencia salvaje. Así nos hacemos parte de la “ofensiva incivilizada” que sacude de sur a norte los suelos continentales, tramando nuestro siguiente zarpazo despiadado a la civilización, que usemos piedra no quiere decir que no tengamos bombas. ¡¡ Mejor ándense con cuidado !!

A proliferar los ataques y coordinación de grupos e individualidades para golpear más duro y constante a la civilización patriarcal y su entramado tecnoindustrial, el camino es arduo e incierto, solo nuestras acciones en el presente revelaran nuestras reales convicciones.”

¡Con los que atacan, no con los que hablan!

¡Guerra sin fin y hasta nuestra muerte o la de nuestros enemigos!

Ex-anarquistas salvajizados

________________________________________

Claim of responsability for attack against pharmaceutical institution (Argentina)

In the face of past events and others not so past, we decided at the end to use this mean toexpress our actions and motivations.

A few weeks ago, we smashed with stones the facade of a Pharmaceutical institution and some other stores that we are not going to name here.

We had not even thought about claim the resposability for it at first, but seeing the fuss that happens in the internet world we decided to position ourselves.
Here, in “Buenos Aires”, for long time ago does not sound an anarchist roar worthy of its political ancestors, we all know what the mess that anarchists did here back in the time and there´s no need to remember.

Today´s anarchists just speak and speak, come together in their assemblies to make big decisions, and make their little book fairs and stuff. Here and there, throughout the world, the insurrectionary anarchic revolt seems to be finally fading, it seems that they did not “keep the flame on” as they liked to say. We are seeing the last convulsions of the drowned as a form of criticism and defamation against those who DO.

We, from this small gathering of individuals, walked up and down their spaces, met all their characters, shared long chats and assemblies with them struggling to change a world in which we no longer see salvation.

It was enough and we got tired, and it was until we read those words full of provocation and pride, that the warriors had, we talk about Its. There we embolden ourselves! We liked reading at last people without moralistic values, without so much hypocrisy and philanthropic babbling.

We do not need to call ourselves eco-extremists to know that those who do, are on the same side as us.

In front of such a wave of attacks that are being launched by these groups, even here in Argentina, with the arsoning of cars, trains, buses and churches that gave us joyfull moments, we feel as an obligation to let our own impulses get out too. Yes, some stones and broken windows is not a lot, but we gain the experience, for us it was very much because we know the impulse of our interior that guides the beautiful wild violence. Thus we are part of the “uncivilized offensive” that shakes continental soils from south to north, plotting our next ruthless blow to civilization, the fact that we use stone doesn´t mean that we don´t have bombs. Beware!

“To proliferate attacks and coordination of groups and individualities to hit harder and constantly the patriarchal civilization and its technoindustrial framework, the path is arduous and uncertain, only our actions in the present reveal our real convictions.”

We stand with those who attack, not with those who speak!

Endless war and until our death or the death of our enemies!

Wild former anarchists

[en] (Mexico) Thirty-Third Communique of the Individualists Tending Toward the Wild

Comunicado 33 de ITS traducido al inglés, en donde los guerreros responden puntualmente a las nuevas difamaciones en su contra por parte, ahora, de los ex-integrantes de los grupos de acción anarquista insurreccional en México.

¡Adelante con la Guerra!
¡Ánimo delincuencia!


a) On professorial insults and blah blah blah

It seems like our 31st communique has hit rather hard, and even the most distant individuals who want our heads have noticed it. They have thus become the same authoritarian monster they want to “eliminate.”

For years we have chosen to not put our finger in the wound and tried to contain ourselves in order to maintain some prudence concerning the lived situation over here. But now it’s time for us to say something about it.

Some hours ago on a stupid friendly anarchist blog a text appeared called, “ITS or the rhetoric of decadence.” This is a “new” communique signed by various former anarchists groups from some time ago and ones most tied to their guild, to wit: Anonymous Anarchist Action, the Conspiracy of Cells of Fire, the Mariano Sanchez Anon Insurrectional Cell, and others. They have squandered their beautiful harsh yapping against us calling us “disheveled madmen,” (noting the use of the gender neutral noun now used by the politically correct), with a “delirious fascistic rhetoric,” “misogynist,” “authoritarians,” “protofascists,” and the other qualifications that ITS members know from memory since the beginning of our efforts in 2011.

The hour has come for these anarchists to raise their voice so that they can be heard, and what better way to return to the ring than with a text criticizing us. They let go of their disgusting words like explosive diarrhea. To what aim? To scare us? To stop us? To intend to continue this miserable fever of “let’s all attack ITS”? Cool.

Their resentment unfolds for all to see. They can’t believe that that group that they once had “solidarity” with has left the pen and has separated itself from the flock of black sheep that they once were part of some suns ago.

And in one part of their text they even try to pass as expert university professors of psychoanalysis in the style of Ultimo Reducto and say:

“Their roots are nothing but the disgusting shit of social dysfunctionality. After a sad childhood and frustrated adolescence, having been bullied from the cradle and traumatized from their ancestors, they begin to channel their frustrations and all of their hate to themselves and once accumulated they project without ethical mediation.”

What do you know? In the same manner, we can say that you channel all of your frustration and hate against authority, against the cops you have killed, or against the Wal-Mart you set on fire. Thus that premise refutes itself. We members of ITS don’t deny that we are frustrated, that it has frustrated us to live in cities from our birth, to tolerate the imposed rules from academic institutions and faggoty jobs, to stand all of these alienating technological innovations, to live together abnormally with people we don’t know, and smile while gritting our teeth when it has been necessary to do so. Invasive religious teachings, as well civic and juridical moral rules have also frustrated us, as well as seeing that any hope for the future is a vile lie. This frustration has turned into resentment, a resentment and sick hatred against society, technology, science, religion, civilization in its totality in a word. It’s frustrating for us to deal with this artificial reality, and we don’t deny it. And yes, ITS is filled with frustrated individuals, the socially resentful, potential misanthropes, suicidal rejects, serial killers, and a bunch of other disgusting things this civilized society can produce. It’s true, and we’re not ashamed to say it since that is what we have become in the process of interpersonal and group interaction with this asphyxiating reality. Our will to destroy and sow Chaos in the most poisonous form has manifested itself. The darkest instincts have returned to us, and irremediably this civilization returns to primitive barbarism, and here in this discussion, we are the prime example.

Oh, and that whole thing they say about “bullying”, that made us laugh. Well from the time we were kids we had that pesky habit of making fun of ugly people and lift up girls’ skirts!

Then they say:

“[ITS is] the axiomatic fruit of this fucking civilization that they say they want to destroy. Only in the deepest bowels of this rot can such decadent conduct manifest itself..”

Ladies and gentleman, you’ve lived this many years without knowing how to read? The goal of ITS is not the destruction of civilization, you ignorant little shits! When are you going to get that?

What’s that you say? We are the axiomatic fruit of civilization? LOL! And you aren’t? Let’s just say that both of us are the fruit of this civilization, look in the mirror and you’ll see us.

b) Revisiting old hat

We clarify and affirm the following points:

One. In that collective pronouncement that the indignant mention, it was not a total defense of ITS, that pronouncement was what it was because of what it stated at the moment. “Saboteamos.info,” “Noticias de Rebelion, “La Haine,” “La Mama de Mummia,” etc. in opposition to ALL the framework of individual groups of eco-anarchist and anarcho-insurrectionary action which in their moment committed arsons and busted up banks left and right; it’s not true that, as they stated, it was published only “in defense of the Individualities Tending Toward the Wild (ITS).”

Two. We sincerely thank you (not at all sarcastically) for the money that you sent us in 2012. If not for that, our brother would not have been able to escape from the police who were chasing him, and a shoot-out resulted in which the warrior responded with bullets but came out unscathed and was able to escape with expenses covered, all because of the economic help you gave us. We’re never going to deny that. When we were anarchists, the solidarity between us was not just in the written word.

Three. Yeah, yeah, we accept that we like to come out on the news, to give interviews, and to be famous up to a point. And that’s bad why? It’s part of the egoic pleasure that stirs in us as politically incorrect individualists. The more propaganda that the mass media gives us, the more the message spreads. We have no moral qualms about using the “press of power,” as you call it.

We’re in the northern and southern parts of the continent. We have accomplices in Europe, and ever more propaganda projects. Videos are published, there are individualists writing provocative texts and translating them into languages we would not have imagined that they would be translated into. This sick message against the humanistic values of civilization is becoming more and more uncontrollable. That’s what we want, that ITS and the groups that emerge as a consequence are unleashed like bloodthirsty beasts that REALLY generate chaos; that they are never ashamed of being the monsters that they have become; that they express themselves through indiscriminate murder and explicit violence. We want for all of this “gets out of hand” so that it becomes a tangible indicator of the rotten artificial reality to which they have condemned us and in which we are developing with pleasure. And that annoys more than one anarchist, but they can eat a dick!

c) Crucify him! The Jews said. Burn them! Said the Inquisition. Let us eliminate them! Screamed the anarchists.

“All that we can identify as negative elements within our ‘space’ is also a responsibility of each one of us to contribute to eliminate.”

This is the “intimidating” sentence that the people in question replicated, but it is really strange. We ask ourselves, are not the people who the federal government sent to infiltrate your anarchist spaces more important than ITS, who aren’t in those spaces? And speaking of, did you know that one of our groups placed a bomb at the “Che Squat”?  That was done mainly because they were defaming us and we shit on those anarcho-rock star ex-con politicians and drug addicts who hang out there, because the auditorium is supposedly so legendary: a symbol of “autonomy” and the “combative” student movement of the ‘90’s. Now it’s just a den of slimy journalists, a place where the Cisen and Mexico City Investigative Police plant their informers to gather information no matter how irrelevant. From there the press has gathered names, nicknames, photos, addresses, etc. of “comrades” in 2014 after various “slaps,” from there you get the Pegasus malware that infected the personal cellphones of anarchists that year and at that site. Let it be noted that we are not saying this to portray ourselves as “defenders of anarchists,” of course not, that ITS group placed the bomb at that squat because inside was a person who was trying to pass himself off as one of us. He foolishly deceived a bunch of young anarchists and dazzled them with his guns, with his threats, his made-up stories, and supposed connections with us to gain popularity and be “that guy”. With that bomb we got him out of the scene and we started to hunt him. Only with the help of anarchists that he had deceived (who you should try to “eliminate” instead of posturing as the “new people who will deal with ITS,” which is apparently now in style). That person returned to his police barracks and we lost track of him. This isn’t a lie, you can investigate it with your sources and you will see that its not part of our “pathological lying.” Ha!

You have your contacts, ITS has its own…

Of course, and we repeat, instead of asking for searchlights so that you turn around again to see, and instead of threatening to “eliminate” us, you should fuck up all those snitches who are in anarchist circles, that bald Tony who for years has been a police informant (and more than one person knows that), and that faggot is still around as if nothing happened in his library near La Raza Metro. He’s not a priority? We could mention more than one who after years in the anti-authoritarian scene, really have turned their backs on the whole idea and the praxis that they once defended, and they have turned informant, or even cops. There have even been people with a record of being rapists in the squats. Where are all of the anarcho-superheros in those cases?

And what about the Neonazis who destroyed the “crew”? Some years ago skinhead nationalist organizations were walking about La Lagunilla with t-shirts with swastikas on them, selling books on Mexicanism, and recruiting young people into their disgusting ethnocentrist movements. They beat up more than one anarchist and punk, and killed an indigenous person in the Escuadron 201 Metro. These people are now members of the Mexican military, or are important members of Sinarchist circles. When did you “eliminate” them? You knew where they were, but they’re still alive and kicking today.

What about that ex-anarchist snitch who was talking about you and other groups, and now is with the reds? Does he merit “elimination” or no because he’s not a member of ITS? How that’s persecution that you are suffering at the hands of the Marxists going?

But well, if the purpose of your text that condemns us as good judges you are with your pompous words and your academic language is to respond to the call of the international anarchist movement to denigrate us, you did well. Truly, more than one anarcho will applaud your words, but you best put your cards on the table and see reality. The reality that you try to avoid is that the anarchist scene in Mexico is complete shit. There’s hypocrisy everywhere and collaboration like you wouldn’t believe, hierarchies that are not hierarchical, black bureaucracy, clear betrayals, etc. If you are seeking to “eliminate negative elements in its spaces,” good luck, you’ll even up eliminating 99% of the anarchist scene in Mexico.

d) On hypocrisy, murder, and authority

These anarchist superheroes have called us “misogynist”. Surely, we’re so misogynist that entire ITS groups exist made up entirely of women. Guess who were designated to kill our female victims? Imagine that, right? What would you call a woman who kills another woman? “A misogynist” as well? “A machista woman”? “A feminicide daughter of the patriarchy?” Here we have noticed the feminist trend with its suffocating humanism has corroded even the most radical anarchist thinking which we sympathized with some years back.

But what hypocrites they are, they condemned us for killing or hurting women? And you haven’t done that? The workers you burned in 2012 after an arson attack of the CCF in Iztapalapa, there were no women there? And the people you wounded when you left grenades in the banks of Ciudad Victoria in Tamaulipas in 2012, there weren’t any women there either? We’re certain that in one of your “irreducible attacks against power” which you haven’t made public, you’ve left some women dead or injured. If we were radical lefties like you, surely we’d be indignantly yelling, “fascists,” “machistas,” “authoritarians”.

You anarchists, always with your moral Golden Rule coming out of the Enlightenment, always with your abject humanist gaze, always preaching your ideas against authoritarianism. Let’s be realists here, we like you know how it feels to take a life, either of a policeman or a common civilian. It’s all the same, in the end it’s a life for fuck’s sake. We, like you, know that to kill a person is to impose irremediably our authority on that being, no matter how anarchist you are, no matter how much you try to justify it as “self-defense,” and no matter how much you oppose authority. When you take a life, you are imposing yourself on your target.

So if you call us authoritarian, you aren’t excluded from it either. We would expect these moral judgments from the social anarchists, but from you? Get the fuck out!

e) To conclude

We suspect that these anarchists are angry with us not only because we have left the anarchist struggle, or because we reject their values, but also because we give a bad reputation to their anarchist project. They worry too much about the gossip that people outside the movement murmur. They worry so much about “what they’ll say” so they decided to come out with their communique to leave behind their dark past with us. Perish the thought that they would be tied to those “fascists,” “authoritarians,” “sons of Satan”!

Either way, already some time ago they excommunicated us from the churches of international anarchism, let them throw us out of the temples of local anarchism as well, it’s not a tragedy.

Let the Individualist War continue against the Alien!

For the international chaotic homicidal conspiracy!

No witch hunt will stop this witchcraft!

With the Unknowable at our side:

IIndividualists Tending Toward the Wild (Mexico City)

-Indiscriminate Group Tending Toward the Wild

-Eco-extremist / Nihilist Mafia

-Eco-extremist Circle of Terrorism and Sabotage

-Popocalitzli Clan

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild (Mexico State)

-Ouroboros Silvestre

-Pagan Sect of the Mountain

-Wild Serial Killers

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild (Chihuahua)

-Desert Band

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild (Coahuila)

-Flint Point Hidden Clan

-Coyote Pack Faction

-Fury of Cachiripa Faction

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild (Jalisco)

-Feral Criminal Band

(en) The Anarchist Myth

Segunda traducción al inglés del texto “El Mito anarquista”, publicado por Animus Delendi.


Note by Atassa: The following has been translated elsewhere on the Internet. However, we have chosen to edit the translation comparing it to the original Spanish. -Tr.

____________________________________________

1) Dismantling the myth

Anything based on the masses, the herd, carries within itself the seeds of slavery. That crowd, which does not self-determine its values, is unable to define its own life.”

Everyone has roots, a past from which through different lived experiences you learn, analyze facts and evolve if you have the capacity for it, or else you are stuck in a loop of mediocrity and pathos. Thus, a portion of the individuals (not everyone!) who today form the nihilist and eco-extremist terrorist groups, including those who write this text, come from the “anti-authoritarian” environments of anarchism or radical leftism.

Having spent in some cases several years within this milieu that is plagued by misery and the miserable, by cowardly hypocrites and moral priests, we know what we are talking about. This is why we think it opportune to present this analysis to clarify why we distance ourselves from the anarchists and their old and obsolete theories. We consider it also important to make clear that NOT ALL people who call themselves anarchists follow the same line of thinking/acting or fit the description that we present. In fact, small circles of anarchists still find affinity with our attitudes, though we know that these are a minority of a minority.

To begin, some of us began to have contact and approach anarchist ideas precisely because we saw in them an antagonistic alternative to the values of society, values to which we have complete hostility. We believed that within the so-called “anarchist movement” we could form that “free” community to confront a world that we hate. But after years of wandering through the ruins of mediocrity, squats, concerts, parties and countercultural nonsense, participating in “mass struggles”, actions and attacks (in most cases symbolic as well as useless), where we risked a lot to get very little, we have finally realized many things, especially the fraud that is the myth of anarchism, in all of its variations.

Because we have seen how this “free community” of anarchists reproduces exactly the same values of society or of the system that it claims to fight against, because we have seen the hierarchies of the anarcho-leaders and their followers, the marked roles, the power struggles between different factions or groups, those who speak and those who listen, the attitude of “if you do not agree with my dogma, you are less anarcho or I will just split in your face” and a thousand and one childish idiocies that are not worth mentioning. Anyone who has been in contact with this milieu knows very well of what we speak. Because we have seen that the “movement”, the squats and everything else are just a product of consumerism, of an ideology for sale, a “radical” or countercultural fashion or a degenerate form of leisure for drug addicts that is far from being the real threat to the System that it claims to be and that it is simply a lifestyle totally assimilated and controlled by the system.

Because we have understood the unrealizable nature of anarchist and leftist programs, the utopian fantasy of a world in harmony is ridiculous to us. We are not interested because, really, who knows how the world will be like in a few years, so why even pretend to have a magic solution and a determined program for the post-revolutionary anarchist world? We had enough of flushing our life down the toilet for nonsense that seems drawn out of teenage dreams. We have developed a more complex analysis of the reality that surrounds us, free of the veils that blind us and the chains of romantic idealism has put us in our place. We got tired of waiting for a “revolution” that will never arrive, and that if it did, we look back at the history and at the behavior of the anarchists (which is a further sample of human nature), perhaps it would be even worse than the world we know today. Because we are tired of putting hopes in popular uprisings but also in the “minority conscience” of the “insurrectionary”, because many times we have heard incendiary and bellicose speeches that were left at mere quackery. Maybe it can be said that we are crazy or lunatics, that our “program” is “kill for the sake of killing until they kill us” … you can say this and a thousand other things but at least we are realistic and above all, honest. Anarchists, regardless of the type (red, red-black, black, eco-anarchist … etc) have one thing very clearly in common: their programs are based on illusions and hopes, and they deform the existing reality to make it fit into their ideological fantasies. Continue reading (en) The Anarchist Myth

[en-it] (Mexico) Thirty-Second Communique of the Individualists Tending Toward the Wild

Traducción al inglés e italiano del comunicado 32 de ITS, en donde se adjudica la detonación de un paquete-bomba dirigido originalmente contra una repulsiva iglesia, pero que hirió a un humanista curioso.

¡Que la sangre de los híper-civilizados fluya como los canales de aguas negras de sus propios desperdicios!


“Curiosity killed the cat.”

We’ve gotten to the point that wounding people not associated with the target is all the same to us, and more because it takes away the joy of striking at those who we choose. In any case the joy at having caused human suffering and bloody wounds persists.

This time we didn’t go out to strangle, stab, or shoot anyone. We didn’t go out to burn, but we did go out with a package-bomb that was tremendously effective when we abandoned it at one of the institutions most detested by us and our ancestors always thirsty for vengeance.

This time, as a target we picked an abject Catholic church located on Avenida de los Insurgentes Norte, in Colonia Lindavista, Delegación Gustavo A. Madero, north of Mexico City.

That’s how it went when in the early evening of July 13th, we abandoned our bomb in the gardens of that church. It was in a black box which contained a galvanized nipple full of nails and marbles. The package had an electromechanical switch, that is, it exploded when the top was opened. On the package was written, “A gift for the House of the Lord, with love.” We did this thinking that the bomb would be taken into the church and it would explode in the “house” of the Western god imposed for centuries.

But, as the press knows, our package-bomb did not explode in the church, but a curious and dumb man was passing by, saw the package, and seeing the word, “gift,” put aside his “Christian honesty,” (which of course only happens in Mexico, son of a bitch!), and, upon opening it at a bus stop, an infernal detonation tore through his old and disgusting flesh. His fingers were blown off, his hands were severely burned, his guts were hanging out, and surely his eardrums were punctured, all that for being a dumbass. They say that you get what you deserve, and it seems in this case, the saying is true…

Let it be known that the attack was directed at the church, but in any case, a meddling Good Samaritan “sacrificed” himself without realizing it, and received wounds that were intended for the religious of that vomit-inducing place. Let it be known as well that if the church and its faithful came out safe and sound in this eco-extremist attack, we aren’t going to rest until we see their churches burned, and we slit the throats of its priests and nuns, and indiscriminately wound religious society as a whole, Amen.

Let’s see if with this the PGJ continues to deny our existence as they have been doing for some time. Maybe they’ll invent some stupid excuse to cover the sun with a finger as they are wont to do at this point. Maybe now the authorities, after reading of our taking responsibility for this action, will retract what they have said previously and deny that the man was wounded by a bomb, but rather was wounded by an accumulation of gas that came out of the ground or some other stupidity of that type, HA!

The investigative police, the agents of the Attorney General’s Office, and the useless people in the Task Force already know who is responsible for this attack. You and we know that the galvanized nipple had the initials “ITS” written on it. But for some reason you said nothing about it to the press, naughty kids!

The “demons” of the natives massacred by the invading Christians are on the loose, no one and nothing will detain their fury.

The attacks continue in the form of murders, arson, package-bombs, and in general, in the deformed “form” of CHAOS!

Courage to the individualist egoists, the eco-extremists, the nihilist terrorists who have shaken off the sickness of humanism and strike without any regrets!

Wounds, blood, suffering, and death to the hyper-civilized!

With the Unknowable at our side:

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild – Mexico City

-Popocatzin Clan

________________________________________

(Messico) Trentaduesimo comunicato delle ITS: Rivendicazione del pacco-bomba in GAM

“La curiosità ha ucciso il gatto”.

Siamo arrivati a un punto nel quale ferire persone aliene all’obiettivo desiderato per noi è uguale, in più perché ci tolgono (in qualunque modo) il piacere di colpire chi NOI scegliamo. In ogni modo il godimento per il dolore umano e le ferite sanguinolente persistono.

Questa volta non siamo usciti per strangolare, accoltellare o sparare a nessuno, non siamo usciti per incendiare, ma siamo emersi con un pacco-bomba estremamente effettivo per abbandonarlo in una delle istituzioni più detestate da noi e i nostri antenati, sempre assetati di vendetta.

Ora, come obiettivo abbiamo scelto un’abietta chiesa cattolica ubicata sopra Via del los Insurgentes Norte, nella colonia Lindavista, delegazione Gustavo A. Madero, a nord di Città del Messico.

Così al tramonto del 13 Luglio, abbandoniamo la nostra bomba dentro una scatola nera, nella zona dei giardini di detta chiesa. Questa conteneva un tubo galvanizzato ripieno di chiodi e biglie. Il pacco era con attivazione elettromeccanica, cioè, quando forzando il coperchio, si genera l’esplosione. La scatola aveva una legenda che diceva, “Donazione per la casa del Signore, con tutto l’amore.” Questo era stato pensato affinché la bomba fosse portata dentro la chiesa ed esplodesse nella “casa” del (imposto da secoli) dio occidentale.

Come abbiamo saputo dai giornali, (1) la nostra bomba-scatola non è esplosa nella chiesa, ma un uomo curioso e idiota che passava in zona, vede il pacchetto e vedendo la parola “Donazione”, ha fatto la sua parte nell’“onestà cristiana”, prendendo l’impegno con cattiveria, portandola lontano dal nostro obiettivo (in realtà questo succede solo in Messico puttana madre!), e aprendolo a una fermata di un autobus (2). Un’infernale esplosione scuote la sua vecchia e immonda carne, le dita sono fatte a pezzi, le mani sono seriamente bruciate, lo stomaco è ferito, e in maniera sicura i timpani sono esplosi, tutto perché è stato un coglione. Dicono che uno riceve quello che merita, e apparentemente in questo caso, il detto ha indovinato…

Che si sappia dunque, che l’attentato era diretto alla chiesa, tuttavia, un buon samaritano ficcanaso si è “sacrificato” inconsciamente e ha ricevuto le ferite che erano pensate per dei religiosi di questo posto stomachevole. Che si sappia anche, per adesso, che la chiesa come istituzione e i suoi apprendisti si sono salvati da quest’attentato eco-estremista. Non ci riposeremo fino a che non vedremo bruciate le loro chiese, fino a sgozzare curati e suore, fino a ferire indiscriminatamente la società religiosa in generale, amen.

Vediamo con questo se la PGJ continua a negare la nostra esistenza come lo fa da qualche tempo. Magari può inventare stronzate per coprire il sole con un dito, com’è abituato a farlo. Magari ora l’autorità, dopo avere letto questa rivendicazione, si ritiri e neghino che l’uomo non fu ferito da una bomba, bensì da un’accumulazione di gas che è provenuta dal sottosuolo o stronzate di questo tipo, SI!

La Polizia Investigativa, gli agenti della procura, e gli incapaci del gruppo di Forza di Lavoro sanno già chi sono i responsabili di quest’attentato (3), tanto voi quanto noi sappiamo che il tubo galvanizzato utilizzato aveva scritto sopra la sigla ITS, solo che per chissà quale ragione non lo hanno detto alla stampa, furbi!

I “demoni“ dei nativi massacrati dai cristiani invasori sono liberi, e niente e nessuno può fermare la loro furia.

Gli attacchi continuano in forma di assassini, fuoco, pacchi-bomba, e in generale, nella “forma” disforme del CAOS!

Forza agli egoisti individualisti, gli eco-estremisti, i nichilisti terroristi che sconquassano la malattia dell’umanesimo e colpiscono senza alcun rimorso!

Ferite, sangue, sofferenza e morte per gli iper-civilizzati!

Con l’ignoto dalla nostra parte:

Individualisti Tendenti al Selvaggio – Città del Messico

-Clan di Popocatzin

Note:

  1. http://www.jornada.com.mx/ultimas/2017/07/14/un-hombre-lesionado-por-explosivo-en-callejon-de-gam
    https://megalopolismx.com/noticia/24151/estalla-caja-caritativa-en-delegacion-gam-un-hombre-resulto-herido-de-gravedad

  2. http://www.enfoquenoticias.com.mx/noticias/pgj-investiga-lesiones-de-un-hombre-al-detonarle-artefacto-explosivo-en-gam

  3. http://www.radioformula.com.mx/notas.asp?Idn=698619&idFC=2017

Ps: Merda, perché in Messico, non ci sono vecchi primitivisti come il frocio di Zerzan? Che sia la stessa cosa per i progressisti…

(es-en-it) El Mito Anarquista

Publicamos este tremendo texto que se asemeja a un puñetazo directo a la cara de los anarquistas modernos, moralistas, complacientes y cuidadosos.

¡Por la expansión de la actividad terrorística que azote la cabeza del progresismo en el suelo!

-Traducido al ingles y al italiano.


I) Desmontando el mito

“Cualquier cosa basada en las masas, el rebaño, lleva en sí las semillas de la esclavitud. Esa muchedumbre, que no auto-determina sus valores, es incapaz de definir su propia vida.”

Todo el mundo tiene raíces, un pasado desde el cual mediante distintas experiencias vividas se aprende, se analizan hechos y se evoluciona si se tiene la capacidad para ello, o bien se queda estancado en un bucle de mediocridad y patetismo. Siendo así que, una parte de los individuos que a día de hoy forman los grupos terroristas nihilistas y eco-extremistas (¡que no todos!) incluyendo quienes escriben este texto, provienen de los ambientes “antiautoritarios” del anarquismo o del izquierdismo radical.

Habiendo pasado en algunos casos varios años dentro de este ámbito plagado de miseria y miserables, de cobardes hipócritas y curas de la moral, sabemos de lo que hablamos y es por eso que creemos oportuno el aclarar por qué nos desvinculamos de los anarquistas y de sus viejas y caducas teorías al mismo tiempo que hacemos un pequeño y breve análisis. También es necesario aclarar que NO TODOS los que se denominan anarquistas siguen una misma línea de pensamiento/actuación ni encajan a la descripción que hacemos y, de hecho, entre algunos pequeños y minoritarios círculos anarquistas aún todavía encontramos posiciones afines y actitudes cómplices, aunque tenemos claro que estos son la minoría dentro de la minoría.

Para empezar, algunos de nosotros comenzamos a tener contacto y acercarnos a las ideas anarquistas precisamente porque veíamos en ella una alternativa antagonista a los valores de la sociedad, valores que nos son completamente hostiles. Creíamos que dentro del llamado “movimiento anarquista” podríamos formar esa comunidad “libre” enfrentada a un mundo que odiamos, nada más lejos de la realidad cuando tras años de vagar por las ruinas de la mediocridad, de okupas, conciertos, fiestas y tonterías subculturales, de participar en luchas “de masas” y de acciones y ataques en la mayoría de los casos simbólicos a la par que inútiles, donde arriesgamos mucho para conseguir muy poco, nos hemos dado cuenta finalmente de muchas cosas, sobre todo del fraude que es el mito del anarquismo.

Porque hemos comprobado de primera mano cómo esa “comunidad libre” de los anarquistas reproduce exactamente los mismos valores de la sociedad o del sistema al que dice combatir, porque hemos visto las jerarquías de los anarco-líderes y sus seguidores, los roles marcados, las luchas de poder entre distintos grupos o colectivos, los que hablan y los que escuchan, la actitud de “si no estás de acuerdo con mi dogma eres menos anarco o directamente te parto la cabeza” y mil y una idioteces infantiles que no merecen la pena ni escribir, cualquiera que haya estado en contacto con esto sabe bien de lo que hablamos. Porque hemos comprobado cómo el “movimiento”, las okupas y demás es solo un producto de consumo, una ideología a la venta, una moda “radical” o subcultural o una forma de ocio degenerado para drogadictos que está lejos de ser una amenaza real para el sistema tal como dice ser y es simplemente una forma prácticamente asimilada y controlada por el sistema.

Porque hemos comprendido lo irrealizable de los programas anarquistas e izquierdistas, la fantasía utópica de un mundo en armonía es una ridiculez y no nos interesa porque para empezar quién sabe cómo será el mundo en unos años, cuanto más como para andar con una solución mágica y un programa determinado para el mundo post-revolucionario anarquista. Nos hemos cansado de tirar nuestra vida por el retrete por tonterías que parecen sacadas de sueños adolescentes, el hacer una análisis más complejo de la realidad que nos envuelve, libre de las vendas y las cadenas del idealismo romántico nos ha puesto en nuestro sitio. Porque nos cansamos de esperar una “revolución” que nunca va a llegar, y que en caso de que llegara, echando un vistazo atrás en la historia y en el propio comportamiento de los anarquistas (que no deja de ser una muestra más de la naturaleza humana) igual sería hasta peor que el mundo que conocemos hoy en día. Porque nos hemos cansado de depositar esperanzas en levantamientos populares pero también en “las consciencias minoritarias” de los “insurrectos”, porque cantidad de veces que hemos escuchado discursos incendiarios y belicosos que luego quedaron en eso, charlatanería. Quizás de nosotros puedan decir que somos o estamos locos o somos unos lunáticos, que lo nuestro es “matar por matar hasta que nos maten”… podrán decir esto y mil cosas más pero al menos nosotros somos realistas y ante todo, honestos. Los anarquistas, ya sean del tipo que sea (rojos, rojinegros, negros, eco-anarquistas… etc.), tienen una cosa muy clara en común, que sus programas están basados en ilusiones y esperanzas, y que deforman la realidad existente para que encaje en sus fantasías ideológicas.

Los valores y pilares básicos sobre los que se construye la anarquía no nos representan nunca más si es que alguna vez lo hicieron. La naturaleza humanista y cristiana de esos valores nos repugna y nos repele. Conceptos como el apoyo mutuo (universal y entre desconocidos) la solidaridad promiscua e indiscriminada por ejemplo a gente que no conocemos de nada, simplemente por pertenecer a un estrato social determinado como por ejemplo los presos, los migrantes o los trabajadores sin parar a analizar a cada sujeto individualmente por sus decisiones/acciones y no simplemente por la categoría forzada en la que ha sido colocado. La creencia de que el ser humano es de naturaleza “buena” bajo ciertas condiciones y se “envilece” bajo otras… eso por no hablar de horrenda visión colectivista de la vida que tienen muchos anarquistas (no todos) y muchas otras cosas más que son, como ya hemos dicho, valores intrínsecos del anarquismo y que no hacen más que separarnos irreconciliablemente con el mundo de los anarquistas.

Si profundizamos en los conceptos de “autoridad”, “jerarquía”, “poder”, “dominación” y el resto de conceptos contra los que dicen luchar los anarquistas encontramos primeramente una postura tremendamente hipócrita cuando ellos mismos tienen luchas de poder, son autoritarios e intentan dominar a otros que no son como ellos.
Porque cuando los anarquistas (o cualquiera) ejercen la violencia contra sus enemigos están imponiendo su autoridad sobre ellos mediante el uso del poder de la fuerza u otros medios. Incluso un simple debate dialéctico entre dos posicionamientos opuestos consiste básicamente en tratar de dominar a tu oponente e imponer tu forma de ver las cosas.
Por otra parte, nos parece tremendamente hipócrita y utópico el negar una realidad del comportamiento humano. Aunque nuestra postura como individualistas deja claro que no agachamos la cabeza ante nadie ni tampoco necesitamos que nos digan lo que hemos de hacer, piensen o tomen decisiones por nosotros, entendemos que la autoridad y la organización jerárquica no es por ende ni “buena” ni “mala” si no es algo que simplemente es, les guste o no, muy natural en el comportamiento humano desde siempre. Por tanto podemos ser unos falsos y caer en la hipocresía de los anarquistas y los “anti-autoritarios” o asumir la realidad y usarla en lo que nos conviene.
Entendemos que en determinados momentos y situaciones una figura de autoridad o “guía” puede ser necesario y beneficioso. Por ejemplo a la hora de llevar acciones, atracos, asaltos armados o lo que sea, hay quien tiene capacidad de auto-control y sangre fría en momentos de gran tensión y peligro, además de experiencia en situaciones similares, o bien conoce la zona, o tiene en general una o varias habilidades que lo hacen más capacitado que el resto del equipo. Como es lógico, será esta persona la más indicada para dar las indicaciones de cómo hacer o deshacer. Porque en un atraco que dura 30 segundos, no hay tiempo para ponerse a hacer una asamblea en caso de un imprevisto (y con frecuencia los hay). No solo debe haber una gran coordinación y preparación previa de todos los miembros para saber qué papel juega cada uno, sino que debe haber unas pautas de comportamiento del grupo junto a una figura que por su experiencia y habilidades manejando estas situaciones delicadas sepa reaccionar, tomar decisiones difíciles rápidamente y guiar a los miembros del grupo que no tienen esa experiencia o habilidades para salvarse a él mismo y al resto el grupo y tener éxito en su cometido.
A parte de esto debe haber unos roles muy bien definidos con base a la experiencia y habilidades personales de cada componente del comando, y sí, de nuevo chocamos con el idealismo anarquista que se posiciona en contra las especializaciones y los roles, e incluso podemos compartir eso del “todo para todos” en el sentido en que vemos la utilidad de que todos los miembros del grupo aprendan un poco de todo (fabricación de explosivos, tiro al blanco, conducción, robo de vehículos, encriptado de archivos informáticos, combate cuerpo a cuerpo, disfraces…etc.) Lo que no podemos obviar es que hay personas con habilidades específicas, por ejemplo unos son mejores tiradores que otros, de igual forma, habrá otros individuos que estén más capacitados para conducir en situaciones extremas y otros que estén más familiarizados con otras prácticas. Es por eso que en las acciones debe haber unos roles basados en la especialización y experiencia de cada individuo, de esta forma aumentan las garantías de éxito en la acción.
La autoridad existe en diversas formas, algunas son coercitivas y otras no, pero evidentemente el concepto de autoridad de la civilización no es algo que nosotros podemos entender como algo “positivo”.
Por ejemplo la policía y demás medios de regulación artificial de la civilización tecno-moral son conceptos ajenos y hostiles porque para empezar lo salvaje ya tiene sus ciclos y medios de regulación propios y no necesita de medios ajenos, y para terminar, por que dichos medios están hechos a medida para perpetuar el orden civilizado. La cuestión es cómo cada cual afronta la realidad de que la autoridad y la jerarquía en sus diversas formas existe internalizada dentro de del ser humano, los extremistas individualistas no rinden ninguna pleitesía a la autoridad civilizada ni a quien sea que se interponga en su camino, sólo ellos eligen su camino, sólo ellos deciden que es lo que hacen, fuera de la hipocresía anarquista que pretendiéndose “horizontal”, “libre” y “sin dios ni amo”, construye su día a día y sus relaciones, al igual que el resto de las personas en una serie de construcciones y roles definidos, incluyendo las muy naturales actitudes autoritarias y jerárquicas. El extremista individualista que sigue su instinto salvaje y egoísta, usando la autoridad cuando es necesario en su beneficio (por ejemplo a la hora de tomar la vida de sus enemigos o imponerse a la fuerza para garantizar su supervivencia) no encontrándose de este modo encerrado dentro de las jaulas morales de las ideologías, la religiones, el progresismo y el humanismo y tomando la realidad tal como es, hacerla más agradable para que sea más fácil de tragar, al final es más “libre” , incluso más “anárquico” en el sentido más puramente caótico, que todos esos monigotes “anti-autoritarios” empapados de idealismo romántico, prisioneros de las cadenas mentales del estereotipo de lo políticamente correcto.

Por otra parte la mayoría de las personas (si es que no todas) tienen completamente asimilada la vida cotidiana presente y no saben, ni quieren, vivir de otra manera que no sea la establecida, la cómoda, el camino fácil. ¿Quién va a convencer a todos esos millones que deambulan por el mundo de aquí para allá de establecer la anarquía? En el eventual caso de la desaparición del estado y las instituciones que regulan la vida común. ¿Cómo pones de acuerdo a todos o simplemente evitas que se maten entre sí?, ¿con pedagogía?, ¿haciendo asambleas? Esa confianza ciega la humanidad y en “la buena fe” de las personas de los anarquistas nos da risa. Además de la tremenda arrogancia de quien se presenta a sí mismo como una especie de “mesías”, un ser divino tocado por la gracia de “dios” que ha visto la luz, se cree poseedor de la verdad absoluta y ha sido seleccionado para la importantísima tarea de “liberar” y enseñar el verdadero camino de la luz y la verdad al resto de los mortales de ese ente masivo llamado “el pueblo” que son, por supuesto, esclavos ciegos e idiotas que han sido y son engañados y manipulados por entes malignas (estado-capital, el “poder”, los ricos… etc.) y no son capaces de tomar decisiones ni pensar por sí mismos ni comprender lo que les rodea, y por supuesto, no tienen nada de responsabilidad en lo que concierte al funcionamiento del mundo actual.

Solamente hay que observar cómo las actitudes de dominación, el ansia de poder, las peleas internas por ser el que tiene la razón o el que manda, las actitudes autoritarias o los podridos valores sociales se reproducen y campan a sus anchas dentro del movimiento “anti-autoritario”. Porque incluso en la historia, en los pocos casos donde se impuso la anarquía o algo parecido (y decimos se impuso porque nunca fue consentido sin el uso de la fuerza) dentro de ese programa o gobierno anarquista hubo autoridades, líderes, dirigentes, (Durruti, Nestor Makhno… etc.) gente cuya voz se escuchaba más alto y cuya opinión valía más que la de otros, unos pocos que tomaban decisiones importantes y unos muchos que seguían y obedecían, por eso en estas experiencias de la historia vemos que hubo órganos encargados de “mantener el orden”, etc., etc. Que la autoridad emane de una asamblea, un comité “revolucionario”, de un consejo obrero o de una u otra estructura organizativa “horizontal” (JA!) no la hace diferente a la que emana de una institución del gobierno o del cañón de un fusil.

Hemos comprendido que la naturaleza humana es conflictiva, que la jerarquía y la autoridad en sus diversas variantes son conceptos muy arraigados en el ser humano y que siempre hubo y habrán personas que, o bien porque estaban capacitadas para ello o por la fuerza se han convertido en líderes, y siempre hubo y habrá quien esté dispuesto a seguir a estos líderes. Siempre hubo y habrá gente con ansias de poder, de mandar, de ser alguien respetado o temido y aún más gente es la que va optar por la vía fácil, que es la de agachar la cabeza, obedecer y no meterse en líos, ni tener que complicarse la vida pensando por uno mismo si ya hay uno que toma las decisiones por ti. Y eso ocurre incluso en los círculos anárquicos, por eso no es que carguemos específicamente contra la podredumbre de los anarquistas, si no que cargamos contra la podredumbre de la humanidad de la cual los humanistas anarquistas e izquierdistas son parte. Las ideologías venden la imagen de enemigos prefabricados y de que hemos de luchar y sacrificarnos por una causa ajena “superior”, pero nosotros hemos llegado a la conclusión de que el enemigo del hombre es el hombre.

Porque si bien hubo una época donde pensábamos que la raíz de todo mal era el Estado/Capital/, después comprendimos que era más complicado, y que el origen de esto era la complicada red de relaciones de poder que es la Sociedad y después de esto, comprendimos que la Sociedad es el producto de la Civilización y esta a su vez del progreso humano, el cual es responsable de la lamentable realidad existente. Y nos guste o no, el ser humano tiende naturalmente al progreso, y el ser humano moderno al peor tipo de progreso que hay, ese que tiene un visión antropocéntrica donde todo lo que hay en la tierra, desde el agua, los montes, los árboles, los animales, las personas… todo es reducido a recursos o productos, beneficios, terreno a conquistar o cuerpos/mentes a las que dominar o domesticar.
Y en esto, muchos anarquistas no sólo se quedan tremendamente cortos al hacer el simple análisis de “Estado/Capital fuente de todo mal en el mundo”, si no que ni siquiera se plantean una crítica a la civilización y el progreso, o peor aún, son tremendamente pro-civilización, pensando que con cambiar la forma de gobierno, de dirigir los recursos y los medios de producción y modificando la organización social/económica es suficiente.

Finalmente habiendo llegado a estas conclusiones con base a lo vivido, ¿qué mundo “nuevo” esperan que vayamos a construir con esta gentuza?, ¿qué nuevas experiencias y momentos liberadores puede surgir de entre tanta podredumbre? Nada absolutamente puedes esperar de los anarquistas, porque su fe en la humanidad les ciega, víctimas de su propio idealismo tienen una visión romantizada e irrealista del mundo y de la naturaleza de las personas. Sigan esperando que, especialmente en la sociedad de masas que vivimos, llegue el “despertar de la conciencia” y las personas “aprendan” a vivir en anarquía, especialmente si los encargados de llevar la anarquía al pueblo son estos personajes. Por nosotros pueden perder toda la vida persiguiendo su utopía.

Porque para acercarse a una experiencia lo más “real” posible de vida auténtica, salvaje y libre habría que mirar formas de vida o de organización social a muy pequeña escala, con pocos miembros, formas tribales o “primitivas” ya perdidas o casi perdidas, alejadas de la civilización y aún así esto no fue ni es nada perfecto ni siquiera consideramos como ejemplo a seguir, ya que no idealizamos a nada ni a nadie y preferimos que cada cual busque y haga su camino.

II) La “anarquía negra” y las “nuevas” guerrillas urbanas

“Los ídolos no existen más que por Mí; basta que deje de crearlos, para que desaparezcan: no hay poderes superiores, sino porque yo los elevo y me pongo debajo de ellos”

Si bien hemos hablado en general de la anarquía como movimiento queremos detenernos más profundamente en una de sus “variantes”, la cual puede parecer que tiene ciertas similitudes con las tendencias individualistas extremistas y nihilistas terroristas. Hablamos de las llamadas tendencias “anarco-nihilistas”, el anarquismo “antisocial” y la “anarquía negra” y del experimento de las “nuevas” guerrillas urbanas anarquistas.

Para comenzar, leyendo los textos y reivindicaciones de acciones de esta tendencia , no vemos más que la repetición del mismo discurso una y otra vez, un discurso puramente identitario basado mayormente en criticar lo que las otras tendencias de la anarquía hacen o no hacen, o el por qué el resto de anarcos no hacen lo que hago yo ni me ríen las bromas (eso de yo soy más anarco que tú porque no sigues mi dogma, algo muy común entre los anarquistas como ya vimos anteriormente).
Al mismo tiempo la necesidad de escribir un texto para todo, con frecuencia demasiado exagerado y con palabras y terminología que se queda demasiado grande en comparación con la ridiculez de las “acciones” llevadas a cabo en la mayoría de los casos (sellar un candado, poner pancartas o hacer pintadas).
La necesidad de convencer, de ganar adeptos y seguidores para “su causa” (aunque esto algunos no lo reconozcan) les lleva a tener una presencia y un discurso a nivel público y abierto, lo cual les coloca obviamente en el punto de mira de los chivatos y las investigaciones. Al igual que los comunistas y los anarquistas sociales tienen las esperanzas depositadas en el sujeto revolucionario absoluto (“El pueblo”, “la clase obrera”, etc.), la anarquía negra deposita sus esperanzas en que sus textos y acciones empujen al despertar de la conciencia de individuos que ya formen parte del “movimiento” o de su parte más joven y enérgica y los empuje a la acción. Básicamente, unos confían en las masas y otros en las “minorías de revoltosos”, pero al final todo es lo mismo, depositar esperanzas en que otros van a seguirte y hacer lo mismo que haces tú, siguiendo la tradición anarquista de esa especie de “fe” mística humanista que depositan en las personas. Más allá de eso, la propuesta “negra” no ofrece nada más que esperar el “contagio” de la noche al día y hace aguas por todas partes.
Aparte, el discurso incendiario y bélico de la anarquía negra no se corresponde con la realidad, donde la mayoría de estos sujetos viven dentro de la comodidad de la pose estética del movimiento “insurrecto”.
Luego tenemos ese famoso concepto de la “multiformidad” de las acciones, o sea que según la teoría de la “acción polimórfica” el anarquista “de praxis” puede (¡y debe!) combinar el poner carteles con poner bombas (como si fuese lo mismo), el hacer acciones de guerrilla mientras se participa en movidas y acciones de tipo público o propagandístico, hablar, defender y hacer apología de la violencia anarquista en debates, asambleas y conversaciones públicas… y así sigue la cosa… ¿pero qué disparate es esto?, ¿qué tontería salida de la mente de un inconsciente o un enfermo mental es este concepto de la “polimorfia”?

De todos modos, el alarde, la bravuconería, los rumores, los bocazas y el colgarse medallitas contando historietas y batallitas incluso en conversaciones telefónicas o en redes sociales tipo facebook (¡viva la coherencia!) es algo muy común en los círculos de los “anarquistas negros”, y digamos la “fama” que da el haber estado o estar preso…

Si entramos al plano del concepto de acciones y de las “nuevas” guerrillas urbanas anarquistas, llegamos a la peor parte de todas.
Primeramente la estrategia, planificación y ejecución de las acciones son desastrosas, la falta de medidas o mejor dicho de una cultura de seguridad y de instinto de auto-conservación es una de las muchas fallas de estos grupos. Los ejemplos a seguir de muchos de estos “anarco-nihilistas revolucionarios” son las desastrosas experiencias guerrilleras (izquierdistas o comunistas en su mayoría) del pasado o presente y sus fracasos históricos (RAF, etc.), ejemplos que se siguen no con base a un criterio estratégico o en vista a mejorar la efectividad de la acción armada, sino simplemente con base a un criterio moralista, de rigidez ideológica o de admiración fetichista. Porque pese a llamarse “nuevas” estas guerrillas no hacen más que copiar los esquemas de las “viejas” guerrillas en muchos aspectos, quizás la mayor de sus diferencias es la parte teórica.

La ineptitud, inconsciencia e irresponsabilidad son las palabras que mejor definen a estos “guerrilleros”, ya que estas son sus cualidades principales, las que les ponen en innecesario peligro a ellos y a cualquiera que este alrededor suyo. Los “guerrilleros” presos en el pasado y sobre todo en el presente son el ejemplo nefasto para una nueva generación de idiotas que les adoran fetichísticamente sin parar a pensar ni hacer la más mínima crítica, ni cuestionar el por qué los grupos anarquistas de acción guerrillera tuvieron una duración fugaz y la mayoría de sus miembros acabaron presos, muertos, escondidos o renegando de lo que fueron. El ejemplo dado por estos “guerrilleros”, sus experiencias, sus palabras y textos animando a seguir sus pasos y cometer sus mismos errores deja una nueva generación de seguidores lista para la cárcel. Por otra parte, la “exigencia” de las muestras de “solidaridad”, como asistir a los juicios o mantener contacto o relación directa (sea por carta, teléfono, redes sociales, visitas…) con los presos no hacen más que llenar los ficheros de investigaciones de la policía antiterrorista. Por no hablar de la falta de responsabilidad, por ambas partes, de quienes tienen contacto directo y continuo con presos cuando están llevando a cabo acciones o tienen en mente hacerlo.

El martirio y el autosacrificio son otra de sus “virtudes”, la reivindicación de responsabilidad cuando son capturados, aún sin haber pruebas que los incriminen directamente es una prueba más de la estupidez de estos “guerrilleros”, confundiendo orgullo con estupidez. Como si tuvieran que dar la cara o rendir cuentas ante “el movimiento” o dar alguna responsabilidad política por sus acciones a gente que ni les conocen, que ni va a seguir sus pasos y que probablemente en unos años ni se acuerden de todo esto. Porque además, aunque nos parezca una tremenda tontería el darle en bandeja a los enemigos nuestra vida en el tribunal, creemos que hay que ser coherentes con las decisiones tomadas y afrontarlas hasta el final. Porque no puede uno declararse “anti-jurídico” , negarse a participar en procesos judiciales, negarse a reconocer la autoridad de ningún juez o fiscal, anunciar a voces que la fuga, el motín y la rebelión es la única opción del “guerrillero urbano” preso y luego pretender acogerse a beneficios penitenciarios, participar de los juicios (aunque sea haciendo teatro), participar en el proceso de defensa legal etc., y aún después de “negarse a participar en las farsas que son los juicios” y “no esperar nada de un sistema del que se declaran enemigos irreconciliables” quejarse porque les dejaron sin sus beneficios penitenciarios, porque las condenas fueron muy duras o porque las cosas no salen como se esperaban. Porque cuando uno se ve en la boca del lobo es cuando se demuestra de que material están hechas sus convicciones, porque sabemos que es muy fácil hablar o escribir textos y ser muy bravo en la teoría, pero al fin y al cabo, el ejemplo práctico es lo que cuenta. Porque ya hemos visto cómo cuando algunos se han visto aislados y más solos que la una, con los que en el pasado les apoyaban dándole la espalda o cambiándose de chaqueta “y si te he visto no me acuerdo”, que rápido se rebajaron los discursos y desapareció la radicalidad y la agresividad de los inicios.

Y cuando vamos al ejemplo práctico de las acciones “guerrilleras” de estos anarcos, vemos muchas acciones estúpidas, mal ejecutadas, con resultados pésimos, mucho riesgo para tan pobre resultado.
Ataques que en muchos casos solo tuvieron como consecuencia una mancha negra en alguna pared. Además, estas acciones rara vez fueron dirigidas a atentar directamente contra la vida de alguno de sus enemigos si no contra la propiedad y casi siempre los mismos repetitivos objetivos (bancos y cajeros automáticos), y normalmente en fechas concretas simbólicas para el “movimiento” (aniversarios de algún asesinato policial, de alguna revuelta del pasado, por llamadas de “solidaridad” con tal o cual causa o preso… etc.) Si alguien resultó herido, rápidamente se sacaron textos y comunicados pidiendo perdón y dando a entender que no era su intención herir a “inocentes”. Porque a pesar de declararse antisociales, terroristas, enemigos eternos de la sociedad y demás palabrería, estos “terroristas” y “antisociales” tienen mucha consideración con la sociedad y sus conciudadanos.

A modo de conclusión podemos decir que las experiencias del “experimento” de las “nuevas” guerrillas urbanas solo han dejado un montón de presos, otro montón aún más grande de personas bajo investigación y, probablemente, otro montón más de futuros presos. Todo esto es el alto precio que se ha pagado por una actividad de corta duración y una cantidad ridículamente pequeña de daños causados (en la gran mayoría de los casos), los cuales en términos económicos se están recuperando bien a base de pagos de gastos judiciales. Este es el alto precio por malas planificaciones, bocas grandes, por dejarse llevar por emociones y tonterías, y sobre todo por pensar que esto es un juego. En términos estratégicos y haciendo un análisis en frío y con sentido común, el experimento de las guerrillas urbanas y los grupos de acción anarquistas ha sido y es un absoluto desastre, y ahí están los hechos que lo prueban.

Siempre hemos sido conscientes de que quienes se sumergen en esta vida, quienes eligen el camino de la ilegalidad, del ataque con todas sus consecuencias hasta el final no tienen garantías alguna de nada, y mucho menos de “éxito” o “victoria”, más bien se tienen muchas garantías de acabar muerto o preso. Pero una cosa es conocer esta realidad y asumirla actuando en consecuencia, pase lo que pase pero siempre siendo cautelosos, PACIENTES y precavidos para mantenernos fuera de la cárcel o el cementerio, para seguir atacando más y mejor, y otra cosa muy distinta es ser un suicida que va de cabeza directamente a la boca del lobo, porque rechazamos y despreciamos profundamente esa basura mitómana de que “la cárcel es una parada en la vida del revolucionario/anarquista/lo que sea” que ha llevado al imaginario de muchos idiotas la creencia del encarcelamiento no es “para tanto”. La cárcel, especialmente con una condena firme por terrorismo de años y años, es sencillamente el fin. Ya no vivimos en la edad media, ni estamos en los 80, las modernas cárceles hacen prácticamente imposible el fugarse de ellas. Una sentencia larga o de por vida no es “una parada” , significa que te has jodido la vida, en la mayoría de los casos por tomar las decisiones erróneas , y en lugar de mantener estas argumentaciones estúpidas y esas anarco-tonterías sobre la cárcel deberían mirarse al espejo y asumir que la cagaron. En nuestro caso, preferimos una muerte rápida y directa que una “vida” de martirio entre rejas que en el mejor de los escenarios te acaban soltando después de media vida preso, siendo un despojo humano, enfermo y viejo, eso si es que no te matan estando entre rejas claro. Insistimos, una cosa es asumir riesgos y otra muy distinta es ser suicida.

La creciente escasez tanto en calidad como de cantidad de actividad ofensiva incluso en lugares que tenían un amplio historial de actividad anarquista muestra un movimiento en decadencia, consumido por rencillas y disputas internas, que pudo ser y no fue, o mejor dicho un quiero y no puedo. Los bombazos, incendios y ataques puntuales no son más que los últimos coletazos de algo ya caduco.
Los que hacían del anarquismo algo más que una cháchara inútil y un intento pacificado y reformista de hacer política social y daban un tinte caótico y amenazador a la anarquía, que incluso en determinados momentos llegaron a representar un quebradero de cabeza para los gobiernos, están muertos o en la cárcel (mayormente debido a cometer estupideces y errores de niños), otros se cambiaron sus posturas cuando se cagaron de miedo pensando vieron que podían acabar como sus “compas” presos o cuando vieron que llevar la pose de “anarco-activista social” es menos peligroso. Otros muchos continúan llevando la pose del anarco-insurrecto-antisocial-blackblock que sólo queda en eso, discurso y pose pero nada o casi nada de poner en práctica.
Quién sabe quizás nuevas generaciones de anarcos sepan dar un giro a esta decadencia que los consume y llevarlo por otros senderos, más peligrosos para lo establecido, esto nosotros no lo sabemos y al contrario de lo que muchos piensan, nos alegraría que así fuera ya que más tensión en la sociedad, más ataques, más bombazos e incendios, asesinatos y alteraciones de la normalidad de cualquier tipo, en definitiva, actividad criminal extremista y destructiva (del corte que sea) añade más caos y desestabilización a una civilización en declive.

Vamos a poner un ejemplo clarificador en cuanto a efectividad llevada a la práctica: la tendencia del terrorismo eco-extremista lleva golpeando desde 2011, cuando surgieron las primeras ITS en México, en sus 6 años de vida, esta tendencia, que ha pasado por diferentes fases se ha expandido a varios países (a saber: Argentina , Brasil y Chile, de momento, aunque cuenta con “simpatizantes” en diversas partes del mundo), y opera en varios estados de México contando en su historial con decenas de atentados reivindicados (desde envío de paquetes bomba, ataques incendiarios, ataques con armas de fuego y arma blanca, colocación y detonación de artefactos explosivos, asesinatos…) más un número sin especificar de atentados sin reivindicación que han dejado no solo daños materiales, terror y estupefacción en ciudadanos y autoridades por igual, sino varios heridos y mutilados y unos cuantos muertos. Del mismo modo, desde hace años en diversas partes de Europa, con especial presencia en Italia, operan y se expanden grupos e individuos de la tendencia terrorista nihilista que han dejado un reguero de atentados incendiarios y explosivos esparciendo su veneno hasta las entrañas de la sociedad putrefacta, y todo esto sin contar los actos sin reivindicación y sin tener en cuenta que, algunas de las personas que a día de hoy actúan englobadas bajo estas tendencias, ya atentaban años atrás por otros motivos (similares o no). En todo este tiempo, hasta la fecha y que sepamos, no ha sido detenido ni encarcelado ni una sola persona bajo la acusación de formar parte de alguno de estos grupos o de ser autor/a de alguno de estos atentados, aún a pesar de la gran notoriedad que estas tendencias han adquirido (y teniendo en cuenta la ocultación, negación y manipulación prácticamente sistemática de sus actividades por parte de los medios de comunicación, los gobiernos, y de los medios de “contra-información” anárquicos) , y de tener a las agencias policiales y de inteligencia de varios países tratando de dar con ellos.
Mientras tanto “las guerrillas urbanas anarquistas”, los anarco-nihilistas de la anarquía negra y los insurreccionales de la FAI (o mejor dicho de lo que queda de ella, una sombra de lo que fue) ¿que han conseguido en estos años? nada aparte de decrecer en calidad y cantidad de acciones en un declive a todas luces previsible, y llevar a un montón de gente de cabeza a la cárcel con condenas de larga duración mientras que en su “historial” no figura ni un solo muerto. Este es el precio que se paga al seguir la línea de acción teórico/práctica de la acción armada anarquista tal como la conocemos, es decir, la mezcla de querer ser activista político y guerrillero terrorista al mismo tiempo, lo cual es a todas luces, un suicidio. De nuevo mucha pérdida para tan poco resultado
Es por eso que en vez de buscar aceptación o complacencias de nadie, de crecer en número o expandirse, debería hacerse hincapié en mantener incorruptible nuestras tendencias, a cualquier precio, a fin de evitar que surjan imitadores, seguidores/admiradores o de convertirse en un circo o una moda, tal como ha ocurrido con los anarquistas. Esto no es una actividad para todos los públicos, es solo para los mejores, los más capacitados, los que no tienen reparos a la hora de derramar sangre (especialmente sangre ajena), si es necesario, hay que cerrarse herméticamente y desconfiar de todo lo extraño. Hay que mantener “pura” la esencia que caracteriza a la tendencia sin degradarse, aunque ello implique ser pocos y contar con pocas (o ninguna) simpatías.


The Anarchist Myth

I) Dismantling the myth

Anything based on the masses, the flock, carries within itself the seeds of slavery. That crowd, which does not self-determine its values, is unable to define its own life. “

Everyone has roots, a past from which through different lived experiences you learn, analyze facts and evolve if you have the capacity for it, or else you are stuck in a loop of mediocrity and pathos. Thus, a part of the individuals (not everyone!) who today form the nihilist and eco-extremist terrorist groups, including those who write this text, come from the “anti-authoritarian” environments of anarchism or radical leftism. Continue reading (es-en-it) El Mito Anarquista

(es-it-en) Algunos fragmentos nihilistas

Traducción del texto “Some nihilist fragments” al español y al italiano, escrito originalmente en inglés por -A.

Compartimos totalmente la visión tan devastadora de este guerrero individualista, animando a la destrucción y al caos empujado desde verdaderos y verdaderas antisociales.

¡Todo lo peor para la civilización y su progreso humano!


Los textos a continuación son piezas de escritura las cuales por alguna razón no verán la luz del día en la forma planeada originalmente. He decidido publicar estos fragmentos, en cualquier caso, como una contribución al debate amoral en curso y a la guerra misantrópica llevada a cabo por nihilistas terroristas, eco-extremistas y otros Egos indomables de poder, en la parte del mundo que sea que elijan usar de escondite…

-A

***

Acecho a través de las sombras de las ciudades al igual que un animal atormentado, rabioso y con sed de sangre.

Veo a mi alrededor y en todas partes veo a las masas pululando, arrastrándose hacia atrás y hacia adelante a lo largo de su marcha predeterminada a través del circuito de la necrópolis-urbana. Pasando rutinariamente por el mundo debajo de sus pies como ratas de laboratorio lobotomizadas, atrapadas en una rueda. Todos ellos aferrados a sus “smartphones”, regocijándose en el brillo repulsivo de las pantallas con cables saliendo de sus cráneos, y expresiones ausentes entrampadas sobre sus estúpidas caras. Ellos balbucean mierda mundana e insignificante en los micrófonos durante todo el día, uniéndose en la fila para sacarse una “selfie” junto a este o aquel asqueroso monumento o edificio. El hedor de su perfume me causa nauseas. Observo sus figuras retorcidas e hinchadas, sus cuerpos desfigurados por todos los años de subordinación voluntariosa, estas exposiciones grotescas y macabras de una entidad biológica absurda y fallida, de quien su mente débil y domesticada se pone en manifiesto el espíritu endiosado del “Humano”. Este es el altar antropogéneo sobre el cual todos los Egos deben ser sacrificados, sobre el cual yacen todos los ídolos nacidos de la repugnante Moralidad Cristiana, y de forma más prominente hoy en día, las agusanadas ideologías del humanismo y el progresismo junto a su civilización bastarda.

Escupo sobre todos estos asquerosos parásitos, quienes con cada acción que constituye la totalidad de su despreciable existencia solo condenan a mayor desolación a todo aquello que es salvaje en esta Tierra, quienes en un patético coro alzan sus chillonas voces para defender este destrozado reino de degeneración decadente. Escupo sobre todos sus altares e ídolos, su moral y sus valores. Mi risa sarcástica hará eco eternamente a lo largo de los pasillos tambaleantes de sus utopías. Las piras de mi iconoclasta voluntad odiosa quemarán luminosamente cuando la luna se esconda y reine la oscuridad.

El rechazo y el desprecio llenan mi corazón al punto de reventar. Grito por dentro, todo mi ser rompe en lágrimas en salvaje ferocidad. Lo salvaje me llama desde adentro, grita a través de mí, clama por venganza y yo atiendo al llamado con fervor. El curso misantrópico del terrorismo nihilista es mi arma a elección en los templos del Hombre y su Progreso, es el cáncer propagando el miedo en las sombras de los territorios urbanos, la hierba venenosa que esparce su podredumbre buscando nutrirse en la tierra húmeda y fría.

Todos y cada uno de estos esclavos híper-civilizados no merece nada más que una muerte agonizante, estos cadáveres andantes por quienes el mundo es convertido en un estéril basurero de modernidad y artificialidad. Así que yo digo que dejen todas sus casas arder, y déjenlos congelarse y morir en el frío del invierno a su tiempo. Dejen que sus cuerpos se retuerzan de dolor a medida que el veneno toma lo suyo. Dejen a su sangre brotar para nutrir el suelo estéril y dejen que su miedo sea nuestro único intoxicante mientras avanzamos en la travesía para sobrevivir en la ciudad. ¡Déjennos reír, amigos míos! ¡Déjennos regocijaros, déjennos danzar sobre sangre y reír!

Alguien me mira, sonríe educadamente, pero mirarlos a los ojos traicionaría mi deseo de acabar con sus insignificantes vidas ahora mismo. Giro mi cara hacia otro lado. Mi mirada odiosa anda vagando, mis criminales y salvajes pasiones me llevan hacia adelante, siempre de cacería, preparándome para el siguiente ataque, buscando el siguiente objetivo, la siguiente víctima, atento a cualquier aspirante a héroe. Mientras que robo lo que necesito del supermercado, siento el peso de la cuchilla en mi bolsillo, mis dedos juegan a lo largo de su vicioso borde. Pienso en incrustar el largo del metal ennegrecido en el cuello del guardia de seguridad o algún cajero, anhelando por el destello de temor en sus ojos y el sonido de sus patéticos llantos pidiendo piedad. En su lugar sonrío educadamente y sigo con mi camino. “Que tenga un buen día”.

***

Aquí, en las prisiones abiertas del basurero de la modernidad, en los cementerios urbanos poblados por los muertos vivientes, he llegado a conocer solo el odio y la desesperación. Hacen un túnel hacia mi interior, espumeantes en mi boca se convierten en un vil y venenoso escupitajo a la cara de toda la Humanidad.

Aquí en la ciudad, autos, colectivos y trenes andan todos acelerando, llenando el aire de smog y ruido. Yo asimilo este entorno sombrío. A lo largo del cielo, torres de telefonía y de cableado de alta tensión se alzan erguidas hacia el cielo gris, vomitando miasma y toxicidad que no se pueden ver, de forma incesante, y mis ojos se posan sobre sus formas vulgares. El ruido ensordecedor del mundo de las máquinas se desvanece momentáneamente y yo me mantengo allí en abismal silencio. Contemplo rutas de escape, la cantidad mínima de materiales requerida para el ataque, etc. etc., y sigo mi camino.

Esta noche, el peso del artefacto explosivo-incendiario en mi mochila me recuerda lo que vine a hacer aquí, mi corazón late más fuerte con cada paso presuroso, respiro profundo y observo por debajo de mi capucha los dientes de león y plántagos que emergen desde las baldosas de cemento partidas. Pienso en la serenidad de los bosques, la soledad de las montañas, tranquilizándome una vez más mientras avanzo hacia mi objetivo.

Como anhelo la sensación del pasto y la tierra bajo mis pies, la sensación del frío y el viento en mi cabello y el fragante sentir de las corrientes de montaña llenando mis pulmones. Quiero oír los cantos de las aves y el despliegue de las hojas en primavera, para yacer ante el brillo sanador de la luna con mis acompañantes a mi lado, para escuchar sus voces, sus risas y danzas alrededor de las fogatas de nuestros más salvajes sueños una vez más… Pero no, esta vez, como muchas otras veces, debo ir en soledad. Te estaré esperando del otro lado.

Silenciosamente subo a los techos. Dentro de este complejo departamental duermen los híper-civilizados. ¿En que sueñan? No lo sé. Pero esta noche despertarán dentro de una pesadilla. Encajo el artefacto entre un atado de cables y luego de un último vistazo al sofocado cielo, digo unas pocas palabras a nadie en particular, enciendo el fusible y desaparezco una vez más dentro de la cacofonía nocturna.

***

Risas heréticas retumban por las calles.

Te miro a los ojos, de forma amplia con energía salvaje.

Vandalizando todo lo que esté a la vista, exudamos criminalidad.

Ni siquiera te atrevas a mirarnos.

La imagen del cuchillo destellante en tu mano.

El sonido de vidrios destrozados cayendo al suelo.

El aroma del incienso se mezcla con el asqueroso aire.

Un torrente de adrenalina surge a lo largo de nuestros cuerpos,

y nuestro disfrute perverso y salvaje revienta las bancas de toda racionalidad

como una inundación, determinada a barrer todo lo que se cruce en su camino.

Al tiempo que las calles se oscurecen para anunciar nuestra presencia

Sin conocer el miedo o el arrepentimiento,

Reímos y reímos.

Individualistas en guerra, aullando en la noche.

Riéndonos mientras las sirenas empiezan a sonar a la distancia.

Riendo, nos adentramos en lo desconocido,

cada uno vagando por el camino propio

hacia donde nadie puede seguirnos.

______________________________

Alcuni frammenti Nichilisti

I seguenti testi sono pezzi di scrittura che per qualsiasi motivo vogliono non vedere la luce del giorno nella loro forma originaria prevista. Ho deciso di pubblicare questi frammenti, tuttavia, come contributo al dibattito amorale in corso e la guerra misantropica condotta da terroristi nichilisti, eco-estremisti e altri indomabili Ego di potere, dovunque in questo mondo possano scegliere di occultare i loro luoghi …

– A

***

Mi aggiro tra le ombre delle città come un animale braccato,
rabbioso e con sete di sangue. Continue reading (es-it-en) Algunos fragmentos nihilistas

[es-en] (Alemania) Caos en Hamburgo

Desde Animus Delendi, este pequeño texto de lo sucedido en la cumbre del G 20 en Alemania.

¡Que se recuerde que los individualistas somos como las hienas aprovechadas!


Bellas imágenes ha dejado estos últimos días en la ciudad de Hamburgo, con motivo de la reunión del G20, varios miles de activistas izquierdistas, comunistas y anarquistas se han dado cita para su particular protesta. La situación, tal como era de esperar, no ha tardado en descontrolarse por completo.
20.000 policías, incluyendo 28 helicópteros, decenas vehículos antidisturbios de cañones de agua a presión, blindados… incluso se han llegado a desplegar al grupo de operaciones especiales SEK, armados con armas automáticas… todo este despliegue de medios ha resultado inútil ya que de nada ha servido para parar el desmadre generalizado que se ha dado en la ciudad por varios días y noches. Además, nos consta que entre las hordas de miles de encapuchados no todo eran “revolucionarios” y gente “politizada”, si no que oportunistas espontáneos, delincuencia común e individualistas alborotadores se han aprovechado del caos reinante para hacer sus fechorías.
El resultado final ha sido la devastación de gran parte del centro de la ciudad, decenas ( o incluso centenares) de coches calcinados, ciudadanos indignados espantados y aterrorizados ante la destrucción generalizada de propiedad pública y privada, barricadas y fuego por todas partes… además de la destrucción y el incendio, supermercados y comercios de todo tipo (desde tiendas de barrio hasta la “Apple-Store”) han sido saqueados.
Alrededor de 400 policías han resultado heridos en los choques que se han ido produciendo, las fuerzas del orden han sido hostigadas continuamente con lanzamiento de piedras, fuegos artificiales, bombas incendiarias y cualquier cosa que se encontrara a mano.

Si bien nosotros ni estamos de acuerdo con los planteamientos de la mayoría de los que han organizado y/o participado en las protestas y los desmanes, así como todo el transfondo del evento en sí mismo nos da igual, no vamos a negar que hemos disfrutado ante las escenas de una ciudad civilizada siendo engullida por el fuego y el desastre, al igual que celebramos los “desastres” provocados por la furia de lo Salvaje.

Así mismo, animamos a todos los extremistas individualistas a estar atentos a estos eventos en el futuro, poco importa que se trate de protesta anarquista contra una reunión de líderes políticos , como es el caso, o una protesta ciudadana por el “gasolinazo” en México o una revuelta por la democracia y los “derechos humanos” como ocurre ahora en Venezuela (por poner algunos ejemplos recientes), el caso es aprovechar las oportunidades que estos acontecimientos ofrecen para nuestros propios fines.


Mayhem in Hamburg (Germany)

Beautiful images have been seen in recent days in the city of Hamburg, on the occasion of the G20 meeting, several thousands of leftist, communist and anarchist activists have met for their particular protest. The situation, as was to be expected, soon became completely out of control.
20,000 police officers, including 28 helicopters, dozens of water cannons anti-riot vehicles, armoured tanks… even the special operations group SEK armed with automatic weapons has been deployed… all this deployment of means has been useless as it has not served to stop the widespread rioting that has occurred in the city for several days and nights. In addition, we know that among the hordes of thousands of masked rioters were not all “revolutionaries” and “politicized” people, but that spontaneous opportunists, common criminals and individualists troublemakers have taken advantage of the prevailing chaos to do their misdeeds.
The result has been the devastation of much of downtown, dozens (or even hundreds) of burned-out cars, outraged citizens terrified of the widespread destruction of public and private property, barricades and fire everywhere … In addition to destruction and arson, supermarkets and shops of all kinds (from neighborhood shops to the “Apple-Store”) have been looted.
About 400 police officers have been injured in the clashes that have been taking place, law enforcement servants have been continuously attacked with stones, fireworks, incendiary bombs and anything else that is at hand.

Even if we do not agree with the views of the majority of those who have organized and / or participated in protests and riots, as well as the whole background of the event itself does not matter to us, we will not deny that we have enjoyed the scenes of a civilized city being engulfed by fire and disaster, just as we celebrate the “disasters” provoked by the fury of the Wild.

Likewise, we encourage all individualist extremists to put an eye to these events in the future, it does not matter whether it is anarchist protest against a meeting of political leaders, as is the case, or a protest against the “gasolinazo” in Mexico or a revolt for democracy and “human rights” as it is now in Venezuela (to name a few recent examples), the case is to take advantage of the opportunities that these events offer for our own purposes.

[en] (Mexico) Thirty-First Communique of the Individualists Tending Toward the Wild

Comunicado 31 de ITS traducido al ingles por Atassa. Traducido igual al italiano.

Que comiencen a ladrar los anarquistas modernos angloparlantes de cagada!


“You will be dead very soon, little man, and the world will continue without you. You will be nothing. Everyone will forget your name!

No, in that you are wrong, old woman. We will leave a brand in the city, we are going to spread it like a virus.”

JV.

We have learned somewhere that the Europeans of the “anarcho-insurrectionary” blog 325 were going to publish a text criticizing us. But honestly we got tired of waiting for it since they’ve dragged their feet quite a bit in publishing it. Maybe they have not yet left the assembly where they formulate their ideas, or maybe they are preparing to go on their anti-globalist vacation at the G20 summit in Germany that is happening soon. In the end, only Saint Bakunin knows, so what follows is what we feel has to be said in response to the referenced anarchists. We take up this medium again to do so, though to be honest, we don’t expect much from them or anything positive about us. To be sure they’ll come up with the usual shit: that we’re “fascists,” that we “turned our back on anarchy,” maybe they’ll have a call-out to condemn us like the good judges they are (though they deny it); the same boring things that today’s anarchists do against us. So then the following:

I

What great fright was caused by the three murders that we took credit for last May! Right? And we speak not of the fright that Mexican society had to “suffer”, a society that is quite accustomed to seeing dead people in their cities and suburban spaces (since for the majority of people in Mexico, three murders in such a short time is nothing.) No, we speak of the fright that foreign anarcho-humanists had observing from afar, as well as their great worry at the expansion of this Tendency in Mexico and the southern part of the continent. They squeal like pigs getting their throat slit crying, “if you have an anarchist project, don’t support them,” “they didn’t commit those murders, it’s a false flag,” “ITS are CIA agents out to justify repression,” “they kill people indiscriminately, don’t sympathize with them,” “ITS doesn’t even exist,” “they’re only doing those things to get attention,” “ITS are most like the Islamic State, Hitler, and the Cookie-Monster,” and other funny things.

And yes, we are referring specifically to the filthy progressivist Scott Campbell of It’s Going Down and the clowns at Horizontal Hostility in the United States, who recently made a whole drama out of our mischief.

So let’s see, if the attacks we took responsibility for are false like you people are saying, why go to such lengths to defame us? If what we are taking responsibility for supposedly isn’t real, you should breathe easy, right? If you believed your own words, when you find out about something that we have done, you would just shrug us off as a bunch of crazies and that’s it, right? Why are you mad then? Is one of our members screwing one of your Anglo mothers? Shit, sorry that came out, it was supposed to be a secret…

Mr. Campbell, you should value your life more. You’re addressing some dangerous people who have killed people indiscriminately for over six years. We are still free, and they have not been able to catch us. How are you so sure that we don’t know the place in Mexico where you “vacation” and we won’t show up as we tend to do? You should chill out because in a country where killing journalists is very common, it’s not a good idea that you go about everywhere with your camera, or you’ll end up like your colleague Bradley Will. Remember him? Only this time the bullets won’t be coming from PRI goons.

What these gringo leftists don’t understand is that the only thing their words published on blogs or said on the radio, or their articles from any influential thinker (like the shit Zerzan or his mules write), cause in us is laughter.

They speak of ITS as if we committed an unpardonable offense to them personally, since, of course, we’re going against humanity! Their promiscuous altruism shows itself backed by the Christian values they claim to reject as anarchists. You modern anarchists disgust us! You lefty gringos are always trying to “fix” things. If the Kurdish minorities are in conflict, you go to Turkey. If there are unprotected immigrants in Oakland, you’re there. If there are children dying in Africa, you go to Africa. If there’s a Black Bloc about to happen, you go to “defend” the people repressed by the state. If there’s a terrorist group close to your country, you go there to attack it (at least via Internet). Don’t you get tired of all that stupid interventionism? The same thing happens with the U.S. army, the CIA, the DEA, etc. If there is armed conflict in Afghanistan, they go; if human rights are being violated in Venezuela, they’re there. If there’s a shipment of drugs in Mexico, they’re about. If there’s a dangerous war in Paraguay, they’re there. You’re always sticking your long noses in stuff that’s none of your business.

And in the background of that drama there is, if I am not mistaken, that president of yours, that pink creature with the hair like a head of corn. Yes, since he’s arrived on the scene lefties see fascism even in the toilet bowl after they take a dump. That’s why they call us “eco-fascists,” what a joke.

In the end, if you’re so hurt by the sight of the families of those we have wounded or killed, if you are so upset by the words that we have put out in our communiqués, and if you are so deeply upset by ITS itself, why not come down and try to find us? Stop hiding behind your fucking monitors and come and face us. Let’s see if you have the balls since you go around bitching so much. Come on down and stop fucking around.

We are well aware that people like you feel really secure in the United States talking shit on the Internet. You walk around in safe neighborhoods with your stable lives and far away from the dangers of the “Third World.” We’d like to see you down here at dawn in Tepito, in the red light district of Tijuana, in the ranches full of assassins in Chihuahua, in the side streets of Acapulco, in the slums of Mexico State. We would like to meet you face to face so you can tell us all of those idiocies in person. Surely you’d shit yourselves.

One recommendation: if you do come, bring lots of people with sufficient firepower. We know that the United States has a lot of it to go around (and it’s not too hard to smuggle it in, we notice). That way you can really fuck us up, since ITS is always packing (Shit, now I feel like Pancho Villa when he challenged the gringo army after the Columbus massacre, fuck yeah!)

We’ve thrown down the gauntlet!

II

Mexico, as is well known, has one of the highest crime rates in the world. It is one of the most violent countries. Here we have the most powerful drug cartels on Earth: the Sinaloa Cartel, the Jalisco Cartel New Generation, the Gulf Cartel, the Zetas, and that’s only mentioning a few. These have been the authors of brutal massacres, car bombings, well-known attacks, and scandalous kidnappings. Among their members are the lethal assassins, the cooks (who are in charge of making bodies disappear in acid), the “conectes,” etc. In other words, a whole network of sociopaths within the drug trade and related businesses. In Mexico there are robberies every day, so many that people are so tired of the criminals that they surround and lynch them, or they die while committing their crimes. Home burglaries, shootings, etc. are the highest they have been in decades.

People are looking for any excuse to go out and loot, to get out of their miserable routine, and it is here that we note that Mexico is a shitty country, up to its neck in its own vomit, about to drown in its internal problems.

There are also some very particular serial killers, ones that the Mexican government would rather ignore.

There are also Islamic terrorist groups here which of course the authorities choose to ignore. We have the example of the Hindu who shot a consular worker in the U.S. embassy in Guadalajara this year. Or the Frenchman who tried to slit the throat of a priest in the middle of Mass in the Metropolitan Cathedral this past May who they wanted to pass off as another mentally ill person. This is a lie, the arrest of three Yemeni terrorists in the middle of the Historic District on the same month more than shows this.

The refusal of the authorities to recognize that terrorists and serial killers etc. actually exist and their pretending all is well, are things that benefits us as criminals.

And that’s because the authorities are so swamped with their own “business” that we, the common criminals, enjoy absolute impunity. We have complete freedom to do whatever we want.

Why is it that ex-members of ETA hide out here, and have lived many years unnoticed until Interpol recognized them? How is it that Comandante Emilio of FPMR went about kidnapping people for years in Guanajuato without being detected until a frightened taxi driver called the police. Emilio was then caught and recognized as one of the most important Chilean guerrillas of his time. Why is it that the most wanted Italian mafiosi in Europe come to live in Mexico?

Thus, in a country of indiscriminate assassins, powerful cartels, armed groups, serial killers, military kidnappers, international terrorists, bloody criminals, mass gangs, foreign Mafiosi, corrupt politically powerful groups, , and the rest; in the midst of this spectrum of criminality there is also ITS. And if we’re not at the level of organization as the armed narcotraffickers (for example), we still have our thing going on.

And for that reason, since the conditions are right to wage our ancestral war as we would like, we do so with great pleasure.

And that is why many foreign lefties hear of us from afar and are skeptical. It is hard for them to accept that we have killed three people in such a short period of time, and we understand. But if a group of assassins with enough bullets are sent by their Boss to kill dozens of people in cold blood as the Zetas did in San Fernando, Tamaulipas in 2011, what could a small group of motivated individuals do with a loaded gun and commanded by anti-humanist rage? The answer is obvious…

III

“The silent wolf gets more done than the barking dog.”

Is ITS truly a priority for the anarchist agenda? Are we truly on the side of the riot police, the Neonazis, and the State according to their concepts? We feel so flattered by that, boys!

We forgot that thousands of white supremacists share the same country as the gringo anarchists. Why not kill one of those fat Neonazis if you want (which seems easier) and then afterwards come get us? It would be good training at least. Or maybe you’ll send mercenaries trained in Rojava? Wait a minute, white anarchists coming to a country full of brown people to hunt eco-extremists? That story sounds familiar!

But no, they only look ridiculous as we saw in California, where various anarchists were beaten by white supremacists in a street fight. We had a good laugh at that. You can see they aren’t used to violence. Scenes like that, but multiplied by a hundred in terms of blood and fury, are seen on street corners here daily. So, lesson 1: if you know the reputation of Neonazis, why are you showing up to fight them with only your fists, sticks, and rocks? A true anarchist would have taken a bomb, a dagger, and a gun. That is why modern anarchists are trampled on, and always will be. They are completely clueless. Did you think the Neonazis who showed up that day would only toss accusations at you and throw water in your face? For fuck’s sake!

IV

And so the altruism of these gringo anarchists makes us laugh so much. They talk about the tragedies that we have caused as if we killed a family member of theirs. They get so mad that they cry out for someone to please come and arrest us for this crazy murder in the Name of the Wild, oh the agony!

Why not settle old scores that haven’t been settled on the Mexican left? Why not try to get the man responsible for the massacre of students in Tlatelolclo in 1968, ex-president Diaz Ordaz? Wait, he’s dead, never mind, that’s taken care of.

But ex-President Luis Echeverria is still alive, the one responsible for the disappearance of hundreds of guerrillas in the 1970’s. He knew about the activities of the torturer Nazar Haro (chief of the now defunct Federal Directory of Security) responsible for the White Brigade that participated in the massacre on Corpus Christi in 1971. This person is still alive, he has never paid for having participated in these deaths, forced disappearances, torture and harassment of social movements in those years. Are you going to let them get away with it? Think of the tears, pain, suffering, and poverty that those family members suffered because of the massacres of the PRI government. Almighty gringos, please help the debts, the victims of the party dictatorship, the poor innocent souls who wander without rest!

You know who is still alive and kicking? Ulises Ruiz, ex-governor of Oaxaca. He’s now a senator and goes cavorting about in Mexico City and Oaxaca itself. Just to jog your memory, he’s the one responsible for the “repression” that the teachers’ movement suffered in 2006. This movement led to a popular uprising that took the Oaxacan capital. Oh, what times those were! He is responsible for the tortures, disappearances, deaths, and numerous other things that people’s organizations had to suffer in those years and after his tenure as governor. Isn’t he a priority? Maybe you would trade his head for that of ITS? LOL!

The thing is that you, modern anarchists, are mad, and it’s not healthy to talk when you’re angry. That’s what fucks you up.

We also remind you that those responsible for the Acteal massacre are still on the loose (Emilio Chuayffet and Ernesto Zedillo), as well as those responsible for the rapes of women and men in Atenco (Wilfredo Robledo and Peña Nieto); the members of the “Olympia Battalion” who are now old men; the predecessors of the Cristeros “Cut out the tongues of communists”, the Sinarchists, etc. who are now called the “Nationalist Front of Mexico,” who are businessmen, soldiers, and politicians in the governing elite. All these guilty people who are responsible for a ton of injustice against the “defenseless Mexican people” are still on the loose. You should focus on resolving all of those issues before saying that you are going to come down here to look for us, fucking faggots.

V

We don’t know the real motive that these modern lefties have to cling to the rotting corpse of revolution. It’s obvious that the utopian end is obsolete (obtained either by armed or political means). Even the most veteran and mature revolutionary know this.

The era in which we find ourselves has no escape. The alternatives that the designers of the system propose only serve to perpetuate it all the more. For that reason it is shameful to think that people exist who still uphold this vague concept.

This is made evident by the example of ETA. This group’s indiscriminate attacks, spectacular kidnappings, and terrorist trappings have long fascinated us. Recently the organization has ceased the armed struggle. Many of its members are now on the run and dedicated to trying to survive. They did what they had to do at the moment. They made the effort, and their dedication remained firm. They had hope that one day they would see the independence of Euskal Herria and, in the end, the “revolution” failed.

The same has occurred with RAF: its bombs detonated with a deafening force damaging gringo property in the 1970’s in Germany, its kidnappings were featured in the media in those years, and its alliances with radical Palestinian groups like the PLO, though quite scandalous, were effective for their time. The murders they carried out were inspiring, but their hope to see a “different” world was chucked in the garbage. With the coming of the third generation, the group dissolved in 1998, and now they have passed from being historical revolutionaries to being common criminals who the police suspect of participating in various armored car robberies.

The same thing happened to the FARC in a different part of the world. The FARC have also given up their arms (and the ELN is on the same path). Even though some groups are determined to continue in the jungle as they have for decades, the organization itself has signed a peace accord with the Colombian government. This has generated different reactions. Some members of the paramilitary groups (that fought to the death against the FARC) have dedicated themselves to hunting down ex-guerrillas, now disarmed and mere vulnerable civilians.

On the other side are the ex-guerrillas who refuse to give up their arms. They don’t want to be easy prey, and even though they know the “revolution” failed, they can’t really return to civilian life after so many years of war. So they contract themselves out as mercenaries for strong criminal groups like the PCC (Primeiro Comando da Capital, a criminal organization with its origin in Brazil but with strong presence in Paraguay and Argentina, which is dedicated to drug and arms trafficking.) This was seen in the “Robbery of the Century” in Paraguay in April of this year, where different decentralized groups lit various cars on fire to serve as a distraction for the main mission. At the same time, the principal body of heavily-armed commandos detonated a large explosive that blew apart one of the walls of a transport company, and after a firefight the bandits entered the company and robbed ten million dollars. On top of this, they had the nerve to escape on a boat that passed through the Itaipu Reserve in Brazil. This act, totally different from the usual methods of the PCC, could not be realized without military expertise, and without the technical and strategic help of the ex-guerrillas of the FARC now working for the PCC.

For some time these types of criminal actions have pleased us more than the acts of political guerrillas. This is sufficient to allow us to say with pleasure that the era of “revolution” has passed and the only thing left is to commit oneself to the individualist struggle for survival, leaving behind weak and disgusting humanist values.

Though we should mention all of those Europeans and gringos who have went over to the Kurds recently, be they anarchists, Marxists, feminists, antifascists (in a word, lefties). Upon coming back to their countries of origin, they will inevitably form new armed groups that they raise anew, the old banners of “revolution” by the armed path, and surely they’ll do that for some years. If they survive jail, the anti-terrorist agencies, and their own errors, they will see that ITS was always right in saying that revolutionaries eventually become common bandits and/or mercenaries capable of any work that requires firepower, battle tactics, and collateral damage. In other words, the same vicious circle we have been talking about. But guess what? It’s not only those on the left fighting side by side with the Kurdish minority against the Islamic State, but also those who belong to the far right. They too are learning, observing, and thinking of the future. And it may be the case that they too return to their homes after the war and just like the lefties, form armed groups that will mortally oppose each other. We don’t want to be killjoys about it, but we’ve seen how this movie ends.

VI

For some time we have been saying that the media has tried to hide all trace of evidence that, in different countries in the Americas, there exists a “discrete” presence of a terrorist group totally different from what we are accustomed to. Various analysts and columnists have exposed the cover-up.

It’s not coincidence that in the countries where ITS has a presence, the authorities have tried to deny our existence or divert attention to something else since they have not been able to catch us. This happened here in Mexico, when we stabbed the UNAM worker in June 2016. The Attorney General of Mexico City denied that we had any presence in Mexico City, when in February 2013, the same office investigated us and publicly recognized our package bomb that had wounded a postal worker.  Afterwards in October of that year, the Cisen recognized us as a terrorist group, but in May of this year, a reporter’s source at the PGR said that they don’t consider us a terrorist group but only common criminals. Please make up your minds, playing with our emotions like that is not funny LOL! We in ITS really don’t care if we are considered common criminals, terrorists, mentally ill, or whatever by the authorities. What is important to us is action with which we enjoy our egoic spirit, either with “good” or “bad” propaganda. In any case, the message continues, it expands, and is concretized.

The same situation occurred in Chile, with the ITS group, “Mystical Horde of the Forest” which executed with full wisdom the first eco-extremist package-bomb attack on the Southern continent in January of this year. Until now the police investigations have not brought forth successful results that have led to the capture of the proud individualists of ITS. For this reason even that bastard mining company executive Landerretche has helped the authorities to divert attention concerning the authorship of that attack, saying that ITS is a false front.

Due to the useless investigations of the Chilean intelligence services, the only thing left to do is say that ITS wasn’t responsible or come up with excuses so that the audience swallows them whole.

In contrary manner, on more than one occasion people have thought that ITS has been responsible for an attack or murder or other action. An example of this occurred this past June with the death of an Odontology student in one of the buildings of the Philosophy Department in the University City. And this is due to the fact that the conditions under which the guy died have not been very clear, and the university as well as the authorities have not revealed any discoveries from the investigation of this death. Maybe it was one of us, maybe it wasn’t. In the meantime, fear reigns in one of the most important centers of human progress here.

The same thing happened by in 2013, when various bombs were set off in one old and worn-down building called the Pemex Executive Tower. The explosives and the shoddy construction of the Tower were an explosive combination that had a deadly effect. In the explosion and partial collapse of the building, 37 died and 120 were wounded. Sure, the PGR shelved the work of foreign experts and published their own official version of the story, which stated that the explosion was “accidentally caused” by a methane gas leak. How convenient.

In this case some foreign and national media stated that ITS was responsible for the attack. From 2010 onward, we have been stating that we do NOT take responsibility for every attack that we carry out, and there are more acts that we have participated in than the ones that we have taken responsibility for through the years. We stated that for a reason…

VII

And well, as we have been saying since the beginning of this communique, the defamation of gringo anarchists (discussed above),  of the Chileans (here we refer to the Perkin pussy motherfucker sons of Contrainfo and others), and of the Europeans against our Mafia have remained in the void as they have not refuted the ACTS in question. While they bark the usual things like bitches in heat, we’ll be laughing our asses off at their poisonous intentions. But let it be clear that everything has its limit, and our patience isn’t forever.

We anxiously hope that they come to confront us at some point, so that the demon of Di Giovanni returns to fill the bodies of defaming anarchists with scandalous lead as it did in its time the body of Lopez Arango.

It is clear that they won’t be able to stop us with their populist verbiage unleashed from the alternative media, nor can it be done by the social anarchists, nor the insurrectionists (including those Spanish kids from “Voz con Arma” or “Rebelion de las Palabras,” those well-intentioned lefty nuns who disgust us so much). They can’t stop it because this Tendency has expanded past the point of being able to be eradicated, contained, or “neutralized”. The more they eliminate the blogs that publish the actions and words of the Tendency, while they try to “denounce” content on the Internet and organize entire events just to talk shit about us, the more disillusioned anarchists are passing from the same old tired anarchism to the Eco-Extremist and Nihilist Terrorist Mafia. This is a fact.

Oh, and if you’re thinking about a group devoted to hunting eco-extremists and nihilist terrorists, maybe you can open up a dialogue with the members of the old “Anti-terrorist Liberation Groups” (that hunted members of ETA in Spain, France, and beyond in the 1980’s) or the “Pursuers of Pablo Escobar” (the “Pepes,” who hunted members of the legendary Medellin Cartel in the 1990’s in Colombia). We just need to remind you that when they decided to hunt the ETA or Pablo Escobar’s folks, the violence escalated instead of diminishing, just as Murphy’s Law predicts in those circumstances. So in that case think it over first…

Surviving just another weekend (with 65 recorded murders throughout the country), and celebrating the murders that we ourselves committed, and with the Wild on our side:

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild (Mexico City)

-Indiscriminate Group Tending Toward the Wild

-Eco-extremist / Nihilist Mafia

-Eco-extremist Circle of Terrorism and Sabotage

-Popocalitzli Clan

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild (Mexico State)

-Ouroboros Silvestre

-Pagan Sect of the Mountain

-Wild Serial Killers

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild (Chihuahua)

-Desert Band

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild (Coahuila)

-Flint Point Hidden Clan

-Coyote Pack Faction

-Fury of Cachiripa Faction

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild (Jalisco)

-Feral Criminal Band

(en) Paraguayan People’s army (EPP), What can we learn from them?

Traducción en inglés del análisis titulado, El Ejército del Pueblo Paraguayo (EPP), ¿qué se puede aprender de ellos?, publicado en la Revista Ajajema N° 1.


The EPP is an armed organization from Paraguay, officially born in 2008 ( altough can be said that according to some analysts, they began their activities in 1997, from a hard-core group detached from the Partido Patria Libre) the areas where they have presence are in the departments of Concepción, San Pedro and Amambay, that is, the northeastern part of the country.

Its political structures are Marxist-Leninist, but its action closely resembles that employed by the Uruguayans and Argentineans anarchist robbers, active in the late 80’s and early 90’s.

In many active armed organizations (such as this) or inactive throughout history, we can learn some interesting things, always far away from the moral values that establish that, because these organizations have an ideological scaffold outside our own, we must ignore them, we do not respond to any moral impulse. Eco-extremists and nihilist terrorists are not anti-authoritarian anarchists, we are not anti-fascists to refuse the information left by these armed groups, it is clear that we do not share their doctrines, but not sharing them does not mean that we neglect the lessons they have left, this to follow our way in criminality satisfaying our Egoist goals.

Valuable things can be learned from both the left-wing and right-wing armed groups, and we have no moral problem admitting it, since more than once we have vindicated ourselves with a marked tendency to anti-political and anti-ideological.

Robberies and kindnapping

As the anarchists bandits did, the EPP claims their robberies in both direct and indirect way, that is, their modus operandi characterizes them and also, in some cases, they also claim resposability for some kidnappings.

To remember their robberies, we must go back to 1997 when they assault a bank in Chore, San Pedro, altough the robbery attempt fail, with the pass of the time they became better in their robberies or “expropiations” as they called it.

Among the most striking kidnappings, is the livestock and logger Alberto Lindstron in July 2008, exchanged for 130 thousand dollars. The EPP released the logger after payment of what was demanded, but threatened him with death if he continued with his practices, Lindstron ignored the threat, until in May 2013 the group murdered him.

The same fate had Cecilia Cubas, daughter of former president Raul Cubas, kidnapped in the midst of a terrible shooting in 2004 and found dead in 2005, a case that shook the entire Paraguayan population.
Other striking cases were the kidnappings of the cattleman Fidel Zavala in 2009 and Arlan Fick, son of a wealthy landowner in 2014, which had a great media impact, and consequently popular support or contempt did not wait, despite the “Notoriety” of the EPP in the media as criminals (rather than “revolutionaries”), all this allowed the group’s penetration in the collective mind of Paraguayan society, in its “fame” among the masses, and also contributed to the group gaining important political and military relevance in the country.

The EPP initial strategy of first making money, to buy weapons, vehicles, houses and, in general, war logistics, rather than start with political-military operations, is highly intelligent, and reminds us of terrorist organizations like “Al Qaeda from the Islamic Magreb (Led by the fiery Mokhtak Belmokhtar) who used (and continues to use) the kidnapping of Europeans and Americans in order to self-finance and to give continuity to their war against the West.

Organization and discretion

The organization of the EPP is similar to the so-called “informality” of the insurrectionist anarchists, although it is not the same, of course. The EPP cells are very small groups of few guerrillas who keep their composure very well, do not attract attention and are quite distrustful. Their different cells are not known to each other, so the delation and infiltration among their members is a practically isolated case. The cells follow orders that are given through the public communiques of the organization.

Although it is known that the members of the EPP reach the 500 militants, in their relatively short history, it is worth to say that they had few political prisoners, although some of the prisoners of the EPP were detained for their political past in the Partido Patria Libre, and part of them, have been imprisoned after clashes with the police or the army, a clear example of which occurred in April 2010 in the department of Alto Paraguay (extreme north of the country), when an EPP guerrilla faced in a firefight a police officer who tried to frisk him, the guerrilla managed to escape wounded and tried to hide in the jungle, the confrontation led to a furtive hunt by the authorities against members of the EPP in the wild lands of the mountains of the Paraguayan Chaco.

Apparently, some cells of the EPP alert each other of this event and new clashes broke out that same month, but in the department of Concepcion, where a total of four policemen were reported dead.

In July of that year, the wanted guerrilla, named Severiano Martínez, injured and with an infection in the brain after the shooting against the police in April, was found by police and was shot down, not without first unloading his 9mm gun against them. As a result of this, on discovering the identity of the guerrilla, the police began to investigate their close circle, searched their house and found information on other EPP leaders on their computer, so, by September of that year, two senior members of the armed group would end up being murdered, others had to go underground and their faces were exposed in all media, whether or not they had to do with the organization, the issue for the government was to make everyone believe that they “really” send EPP members to the prison, and not to be ridiculous before the media.

Military action

Although the EPP suffered the aforementioned blow, it appears that the security and double life they do is so high that the controversial Wikileaks group leaked information that the Paraguayan government in 2010 had asked the major US intelligence agencies for permission to use high-quality technology to spy on drug trafficking phones (which was actually to try to spy on the EPP), which, until today have not had any result derived from government espionage.

In September 2011, just one year after the authorities celebrated the death of those EPP leaders and ordered the capture of others, the group surprised with a surprise attack on a police station, where two policemen were killed, one of them killed with more than 10 bullets in their body, proving that the EPP was still active.

Nowadays, has been attributed to the EPP more than 60 direct deaths among military, police, businessmen and civilians, most of them executed for continuing to plant Monsanto’s soybean and corn and the use of its harmful agrochemicals, which were prohibited by the group in the areas where it has presence.

The last military action of the armed group was at the end of August of 2016, when they detonated an explosive against a military vehicle, and they kill off the wounded soldiers, leaving 8 of them dead, reason why the alarms of the government went on, promising to find those responsible, but so far until now there is no information of any arrest.

Lessons

From the history of the EPP several lessons can be learn by the eco-extremists and nihilist terrorists who want to take them.

1 a) It is highly recommended to be cautious, have a closed group and act only with them or alone, do not waste the time to “invite” or “recruit” others who you dont know into your close circle, the EPP is an example of discretion , because not even with the surveillance programs of the FBI have been able to dismantle the organization.

2 b) The number of members of a group does not matter if the attacks they make are direct and accurate, the EPP teaches that it is not necessary to have an entire “army” (although they are self-defined as such), or have a large number of armed men, murdering a person always captures the media attention and depending on the objective, can create a local controversy (such as the employee of the UNAM chemistry faculty killed by ITS in June 2016), or international (such as the biotechnology expert Killed by ITS in November 2011), a murder can be committed by a person with a simple knife, it is not necessary a large armament or a large number of combatants.

3 c) It is not recommended to store information from other groups that the police can find, if you have this type of information, in case you are arrested and the police search your house, you can get relate to them and they can find and arrest more members of your same or different group. In other words, DO NOT make the same mistake as Severiano Martínez.

4 d) It is recommended to have a source of money to finance attacks, whether working or doing robberies, this depends on the conditions developed by the individualists interested in the war against civilization.