The shock for the terror attack that left 50 killed in a New Zealand mosque has been enormous, as well as the impact caused by the perpetrator’s manifesto, so I felt the need to break down and make an analisis about the aforementioned, and by the way, I think is the perfect chance to finally set clear the differentiation between eco-extremism and eco-fascism, those who are smart enough will understand, those who are not, will continue labeling us as eco-fascists as they have been doing for a while, those brainless people will continue talking, writing thousand pages texts against us, publishing books, organizing events to discredit the ITS Mafia, but we will not stop neither our actions nor our propaganda, we are here to stay, that’s for sure!
II. Hisotry, race and economical power
Race is the main topic for supremacists of any kind (whites, blacks, brown, yellow, etc.), according to them, there is, without any doubt, a global racial war, and they are partially right about that. Focusing in white supremacists, the cause of the race in many places of Europe is the main force that make certain individuals or groups to arm theirselves to the teeth to defend it whatever it takes, and this is somehow logic having in mind the feeling of belonging arraigated in several european cultures since centuries ago, as an example of this we can see the invasions of Europe by islamic powers. The Otoman Empire took by force several european territories and raid the economy of many others, of course, that invasion bring consequences, diseases, murders, rapings, bans and a serie of actions that lead to the resistance against the invaders. Removing from ourselves the political correctness is quite understandable the hate against the extrangers that inherited those societies who live that in their own flesh, for example, a village of white people in wich all of the have an agricultural based life, in wich everyone knows each other, have beliefs attached to nature and they live relatively in peace is perturbed by the arrival of people who do not speak the same languaje, with a different skin color and that comes not only to impose their religion but also to kill, enslave and rape, the logical answer of those white people living on islamic controlled territory would be hostility towards the invaders, to claim for revenge and that every time that they see someone with such characteristics want to kill him or kick him out. The same happened in America, a village of hunters-gatherers and nomads of brown skin people who live according to their ancestral traditions, that have animist pagans beliefs attached to nature, in wich everyone knows each other and live relatively peace and harmony is perturbed by the arrival of white people, with blue eyes and blond hair wich do not come to open a dialog, as they do not speak the same languaje, they come to impose catholicism, burn down their homes, kill the warriors and rape the women, what would be the answer? Conflicts like Mixton War and Chichimeca War, among others.
This is why I think that hate against extrangers is understandable for the people that live back in that days, but well, Can this hate still being valid in the current days? As we can see, yes it is, but is compressible? I guess that for white supremacists it is, even after several united armies kick out the Otoman empire from european lands and put them back in their place, after hunders of years have passed and the Middle East became poor and Europe rich, that the same successors of the Otoman empire come again to “invade” Europe but in a more sutile way, is like an insult for those who do not forget the aforementioned history.
But the main reason here on the topic of invasions is not the race (as race is a secondary and irrelevant issue, as all human beings without exception are a mix of genes in wich “purity” is something irrelevant, ask a biogenetic) but economy, the main reason of the islamic raids towards Europe was economical and territorial power, as it was the main reason for the European invasion of America, Africa and Oceania. Then, what is the real motivation? The supremacy of think of yourself as better than the rest and being the great conqueror of everything. The supposed “invasion” and “white genocied” stated by Brenton Tarrant on his manifesto is just a disgusting garbage.
Who were the one that came out from Europe to conquer lands? Weren’t the white portuguese the ones who invaded Africa and enslaved thousands of native peoples, wich later they exported to Brazil and other places as slave labor force? Weren’t the white spanish the ones who carry out a genocide of gigantic proportions and wipe out entire populations in Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Peru, Uruguay, etc.? Weren’t the white french the ones who arrived to Canada and enslaved and killed the native people that were opposing resistance? Weren’t the white english the ones who came to North America and stole the lands from the natives? Weren’t the white dutch the ones who came the last to the repartition of territory and also commit atrocities in those beautiful places? Aren’t the whites (europeans, jews, etc.) the ones who own the world? Aren’t the whites the ones of biggest notoriety within the corporations, mass media and are the main influencers of opinion? Is not the english languaje (of the whites) the global languaje?
The history of Europe is filled with nevereding wars, they are overdosed with a frentic ambition, they always wanted to became the owners of everything, and they manage to archieve it.
Im not saying here that white people should become our main target, as the war of ITS is not a racial war, we do not care about reducctionist issues like that because for us, race is something secondary whithout any importance. For us whites, blacks, browns, yellow, etc. are an uniform mass of humans, wich contribute to the expansion fo this cursed race that devastates nature and tend towards progress, and this is why ITS attacks whithout caring about races, ages, genders, nationality, etc.
Back to the topic, what is worth to mention here is that the author is adopting an indirect position of victimism, showing the white race as vulnerable when the truth is that the whites, as I stared before, are the ones that own the world since centuries ago.
We in America SHOULD be more angry for what they came to do here, there should be armed and terrorists groups really dangerous wich kill white europeas and remember their native roots, but that does not happen because many potentially dangerous individuals have been sedated with their vices, alcohol for example, their drugs, their pornography, their videogames, their technology, their judeo-christian religions, their prestigious brands, their social networks, all of this are invention of whites (europeans, jews, christians, etc.)
Those cry-babies white supremacists tell us that there is a genocide of the white race because muslims come asking for job, build mosques in their nice and quiet neighborhoods and marry white women, what a bullshit! You white european supremacists don’t know what is to suffer a genocide, you don’t know what is slavery, poverty and the struggle for survive in places were you will not last not even a fucking day. You are exactly like the jews, another cry-babies assholes that complain and repeat about the holocaust untill the disgust, when here in America invaders perpetrated the biggest massacre of wich nobody knows because the official history does NOT focus on that, invaders killed entire villages, great numbers of native population were wiped out and forget, thousends of millions of our ancestors were killed, and you complain about some deaths? You talk about genocide? Sons of bitches! Shame on you motherfuckers!
I would like to clarify, before the usual idiots read this and judge me wrong: I am NOT antisemitic, I am NOT anti-european, I am NOT anti-whites, I am NOT american-centrists nor indigenist and I am NOT a nationalist, thats for sure. I’m just exposing my point of view before the non sensical statements of Tarrant and the TRUTH of what is going on in this modern world far away from the political correctness. They wanted to banish us from the official history, they hide obvious realities, they send us to the progressivist forgetness, but still exist some people who have memory.
III. Eco-fascism vs eco-extremist misanthropy
For many people, the finnish author Pentti Linkola is a referent of eco-fascism, this person who live a simple live working on non-commercial fishing have several essays in wich he stated his ideology that in the current days, many have adopted, mainly in Europe. The proposals of this person goes from eugenics to the bombing of the major cities with weapons of mass destrucction, all this in order to have a population control and the improvement of the race. The development of sustainable techonologies and conservation of spcies and eco-systems. The abandoment of techonology and return to a middle-age lifestyle to counter the damage done to the enviroment by the western modern civilization has caused. All this will be archieved, according to Pentti, by a dictatoship that imposes all this bit by bit, those ideas can be reflected in the novel “Iron Gates” of Temple ov Blood, but in a more exagerated form.
Linkola admitted admiration for the management and consolidation of nazi Germany, wich had some close characteristics to autohor’s ideas. In general, the doctrine of this person, with the historical weight that have on it, fit very good with the nationalist feeling of apropiation of many europeans, this is why it fit like a ring on a finger for many of them. Now, after the terror attack in New Zealand, Tarrant has become an importan person for this doctrine, as he describes himself as eco-fascist and on his manifesto wrote statements that match with the ideas of Linkola.
Of course, ITS strongly rejects eco-fascism not only because proposes a political model like a dictatorship (here is worth to mention that we will reject it the same way if the political model were democratic, socialists, republican, etc) but because the idea still being progresist, it can be obviously noticed that eco-fascism is a purely progresist doctrine, as it aims directly to a social improvement and a better way of life for humanity itself, even if its methodology and practices look extremists (and in fact they are), it ending arriving to the same point of every other humanist doctrine, progress as species. So, eco-fascism is rather an “humanist anti-humanist” doctrine, as it propose the elimination of humans but at the same time justifies it by stating that other humans would live a better life, some sort of Thanos (yes, that famous from the comics)
We, ITS, do not have consideration for the future of anyone, that means we do not want a better tomorrow for the children of Mexico or America, or somewhere else, we don’t care at all about children, aged people, youngsters, adults. Their future is filled of horrors and imposed ignorance that will make them live a long a dismal useless life.
We, in oposition to eco-fascism, are not moved by cravings of willing to live better on the future, the present is what we have and thats that. This present is a real shit, stinks and disgusts until makes you throw up but it is what it is, is what we have, we live on this and we attack it from time to time as we are the disgusting reflection of a reality that AGOBIA and makes us sick.
It is clear the diference between eco-extremism and eco-fascism, only a fool don’t see what is in front of his or her eyes, but of course, we cant expect a lot from some people that experiences a sever identity crisis and don’t even know what they are, men and women, and to avoid existencial puerile confrontation omit their own gender with “e” or “x”.
IV. Anarchism, begetter of “monsters”
In “Answers to possible questions”, the author of “The Great Replacement” wrote:
“Did you always had that point of view?
No,when I was young I was a communists, then an anarchists and finally a libertarian to lately become an eco-fascist.”
For all those anarchists that get scandalized by what this person have done, learn this good, this “monster” became what he is now by an ideological process that came both from communism and from anarchism, and look what you breeded!
The same happen here, we came from anarchism and look what we are now, sociopaths willing to destroy everything and kill even the supporters of our old ideas!
Look what anarchism breeded, misanthropes, murderers and terrorists like Ravachol, Di Giovanni, Galleani, Mario Buda, Mauricio Morales, ITS, thank you anarchism, thank you a lot!
And this concerning the monsters that went towards the left, if we talk about the monsters that went towards the far-right we can mention Tarrant and Benito Mussolini, do you remember? So he, back on his young days was an active supporter of anarchist direct action in Italy, years later, he took inspiration from his own juvenile adventures beating up oppositors for the creation of the Black Shirts, those ones that beat to a pulp communists who oppose italian fascism, what an history aye?
Is curious, Tarrant became main protagonist of one of the biggest massacres perpetrated by white supremacists, the same Tarrant the years ago was an anarchist and maybe hate supremacists, and maybe swear allegiance to his complex of stateless, how much changes the life!
The attack made by tarrant marked contemporary history, it will motivate future attacks in Europe and USA, there will be consequences. ISIS (now reduced to a guerrilla) and Al Qaeda of Islamic Magreb promised revenge and are encouraging their lone wolves to attack white supremacists, obviusly ITS celebrate all this, we do not care about the tears of the massacred muslims, neither the tears of the future victims of the islamic extremists, the attack of Tarrant will bring Chaos and destabilization and if it comes, we warmly welcome it.
For the arrival of Chaos to every corner!
Awakening the forces of the Unknown that roam everywhere!
Churches, temples, mosques, all must burn!
Individualists Tending Towards the Wild – Mexico