Tag Archives: Mafia Eco-extremista

(es-en) “Individualidades antisociales por la caída de la civilización” abandonan bomba falsa

Comunicado reivindicativo de las “Individualidades antisociales por la caída de la civilización, Grupúsculo Espíritus del bosque. Tomando la responsabilidad del abandono de una bomba falsa en club nocturno en Torreón Coahuila, México. Ataque Egoísta y  Salvaje, en guerra contra a civilización.

¡Larga vida a los individualistas que atacan la sociedad civilizada!

¡Animo eco-extremistas, eco-anarquistas y nihilistas terroristas!


Luz artificial, luz de muerte

Su luz opaca la belleza de las estrellas, siguen las nefastas risas artificiales invadiendo la incertidumbre de la noche. No-vivos, danzan por los ríos de concreto sintiéndose tan libres, sintiéndose los amos y señores de todo lo que no comprenden. Inmersos en una existencia basada en actividades superfluas, siguen como corderos aquello que es normal para la civilización; trabajar, beber, dormir, trabajar, beber, dormir, así hasta la muerte. Para nosotros, esos no-vivos, son cómplices del avance de la civilización tecno-industrial y su tan venerado progreso, al estar inmersos en su rutina. Una felicidad ficticia y sedada ¿a costa de qué? ¿Quién está pagando el avance de la vida civilizada?, la respuesta es más que clara; La Naturaleza Salvaje. Mientras los gases tóxicos de los autos envenenan el aire, ellos beben hasta perder la conciencia, como si nada pasara, como si los daños irreparables hacia la Tierra, fueran sólo cosa de cuentos y películas.

El ecocidio avanza a una velocidad de pesadilla, esta vez va disfrazado de humanismo y progreso. El teatro del progreso en el que todos quieren ser el protagonista ha iniciado. Éxito y progreso van de la mano y todos los no-vivos quieren ir acompañados de ambos. Para ellos su éxito se basa en la acumulación de objetos (inertes, a los que la civilización les asigna un valor), ven a un ser humano, sea masculino o femenino como sólo un cuerpo para complacer su deseo sexual, para complacer la práctica y pensamientos fecundados por esta civilización hipersexualizada. ¿Enserio no-vivos? ¿Tan interesante es charlar sobre marca de bebidas alcohólicas? Su mundo, sus vidas, se basan en que club nocturno se emborracharán el siguiente fin de semana. ¿A eso le llaman vida?

Nuestro pesimismo, el pesimismo que crece cada día más dentro de nosotros. No esperamos que nada cambie, no tenemos la falsa y ridícula esperanza de que el humano logre cambiar su pensamiento y su actuar en pos de salvar a La Naturaleza Salvaje, siendo el mismo humano su único destructor. ¿Todo está perdido? Sí. Sólo La Naturaleza Salvaje podrá rendir cuentas, de todo el daño que ha sufrido.  ¿Entonces por qué actúan? se preguntarán. Actuamos porque somos individualidades egoístas, que desean mantener sus instintos salvajes, atacar todo aquello que resulte ajeno a nosotros, la civilización no logrará arrancarnos el salvajismo de nuestros antiguos. Ellos en su momento defendieron con su vida sus costumbres y el entorno salvaje en el que vivían, nosotros seguiremos con esa guerra, aunque la guerra contra la civilización este ya perdida. A vivir y morir como salvajes, individualistas y egoístas.

Como ya lo mencionamos para nosotros todo está perdido, aun así, nuestro latir indómito no nos permite ser no-vivos. Es por eso que el día 22 de julio del 2016 (según el calendario gregoriano) arropados por la luz natural del sol, creamos tensión. Abandonando un artefacto de apariencia sospechosa a las afueras de un club nocturno de nombre “JINX” ubicado en Torreón Coahuila, México, esto porque consideramos a los bares y clubes nocturnos, como fenómenos ajenos que corrompen la belleza natural de la noche. Es gracioso como unas simples latas enrolladas con algunos cables despertaran semejante movilización de las fuerzas del orden, tanta fue la ineptitud de los policías municipales y estatales, que se vieron obligados a llamar a un equipo especial antibombas de la SEDENA. Esto sólo nos da motivos para burlarnos. ¡Gran preparación de las fuerzas del orden! (si como no). El artefacto fue encontrado por los empleados del club nocturno, alrededor del mediodía, la idea principal era; que fuera encontrado por la noche, en el horario donde el club recibe a todos los no-vivos sedientos de diversión. Por ahora disfrutamos de la tensión creada en las autoridades y en los transeúntes que pasaban por el lugar.

“!Axkan kema, tehuatl, nehuatl!”, fue el mensaje que se podía leer en un pedazo de hoja junto con el artefacto, la prensa local dijo que se trataba de un mensaje de amor, efectivamente un mensaje de amor a La Naturaleza Salvaje, y un mensaje de odio a la civilización. El próximo paquete no será “una broma de mal gusto”.

¡Por la defensa extrema de La naturaleza salvaje!

¡Por mantener vivos nuestros instintos salvajes!

¡Larga vida a los anarquistas anti civilización, eco extremistas y nihilistas terroristas!

¡Muerte a la civilización y sus lacayos!

Abrazo cómplice a Tamara Farías, salvaje individualista que no titubeo en meter una bala en la cabeza de un guardia bancario.

¡Axkan kema, tehuatl, nehuatl!

¡Hasta tu muerte o la mía!

– Individualidades antisociales por la caída de la civilización –Grupúsculo Espíritus del bosque


“Antisocial Individualities for the fall of civilization” abandon a false bomb

Artificial light, light of death

In the opaque light, the beauty of the stars, the nefarious artificial laughter invades the uncertainty of the night. The non-living dance on the rivers of concrete feeling so free, feeling to be masters and lords of all that they don’t understand. Immersed in an existence based on superfluous activities, they follow along like lambs with all that is normal for civilization: work, drink, sleep, work, drink, sleep, all the way until death. For us, these non-living are accomplices in the advancement of techno-industrial society and its venerated progress, being immersed in its routine. A sedate and fictitious happiness, but at what cost? The answer is all too clear: Wild Nature. While toxic gases from cars poison our air, they drink to the point of losing consciousness, as if nothing were happening, as if the irreparable damages to the Earth were things that only existed in stories or in the movies.

Ecocide advances at a nightmarish pace, this time dressed up as humanism and progress. The theater of progress in which all want to be the protagonist has begun. Success and progress go hand in hand, and all of the non-living want to be accompanied by both. For them success is based on the accumulation of objects (inert ones, the ones which civilization values). They see another human being, either male or female, as only a body to use to pleasure themselves sexually; and to take pleasure in the practice and thoughts fostered by this hyper-sexualized civilization. Really, non-living ones? It’s so interesting to talk about various brands of alcoholic drinks? Their world, their lives, are based on the night club in which they get drunk next weekend. And this is what they call life?

Our pessimism, the pessimism that grows by the day within us. We aren’t expecting anything to change. We don’t have false and ridiculous hope that the human changes his thinking and actions in order to save Wild Nature, since the same human is its only destroyer. Is all lost? Yes. Only Wild Nature can give account for all that she has suffered. So why do you act then? We act since we are egoist individualities who want to maintain our wild instincts and attack all that is alien to us. Civilization will not take from us the savagery of our ancestors. They in their time defended their customs and the environment in which they lived with their lives. We will continue that war, even if the war against civilization has been lost. To live and to die like savages, individualists and egoists.

As we mentioned, for us all is lost, even so, our untamed heartbeat does not permit us to be among the non-living. That’s why on July 22nd, 2016 (according to the Gregorian calendar), clothed with the natural light of the sun, we created tension. We abandoned a device of suspicious appearance outside of a nightclub named “JINX” located in Torreón, Coahuila, México. The reason for this location is that we consider bars and night clubs to be alien phenomena that corrupt the natural beauty of the night. It’s funny how some simple cans wrapped up in some cables can mobilize so many among the forces of order. Such was the ineptitude of the municipal and state police that they were obligated to call an anti-bomb squad of the SEDENA. This gives us significant cause to mock them. What great preparedness of the forces of order! (of course) The device was found by the employees of the night club around noon.

The intention was for it to be found at night, the time when the club receives all of the non-living thirsty for diversion. For now we are enjoying the tension it caused among the authorities and the passersby.

“Axkan kema, tehuatl, nehuatl!” was the message that could be read on the piece of paper bound to the device. The local press said that it was a love letter, and that is correct: it was a love letter to Wild Nature, and a threatening letter against civilization. The next package will not just be a “joke in bad taste.”

For the extreme defense of Wild Nature!

To keep alive our savage instincts!

Long life to the anti-civilization anarchists, eco-extremists, and nihilist terrorists!

Death to civilization and its lackeys!

An accomplice embrace to Tamara Farías, savage individualist who did not hesitate to put a bullet in the head of a bank security guard!

Axkan kema, tehuatl, nehuatl!”

Until your death or mine!

-Antisocial Individualities for the fall of civilization

(Mexico) Grupo terrorista advierte más asesinatos

Desde la prensa mexicana:

2 de julio

La Procuraduría de Justicia del Gobierno de la Ciudad de México ya investiga el asesinato de un trabajador de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), del jefe de servicios de la Facultad de Química, José Jaime Barrera Moreno, crimen que se atribuyó un grupo extremista denominado Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje (ITS). En un comunicado publicado en un blog, la agrupación afirmó que acuchillaron al trabajador universitario, quien fue encontrado sin vida la mañana del pasado martes dentro de Ciudad Universitaria, tal como consta en la indagatoria CI-FCY/COY-1/UI-I/CD/1122/06-2016, sin que hubieran sido ubicados testigos del crimen, ni cámaras de seguridad que lo registraran. El cadáver tenía una herida de arma blanca bajo la axila izquierda que causó que se desangrara hasta fallecer. “Apuñalamos ayer al jefe de Servicios Químicos de la Facultad de Química de la UNAM (…) Ya lo habíamos dicho en nuestro primer comunicado en enero de este año, ‘los heridos y muertos que causemos serán una ofrenda de sangre para la Naturaleza Salvaje’, y no bromeábamos”, señala el comunicado digital, publicado este miércoles.

“Apuñalamos al jefe de servicios de la Facultad de la Química de la UNAM; nuestro cuchillo perforó su carne, músculos y venas, desangrándolo y dejándolo sin vida. Es una pena que no le pudiéramos arrancar el cuero cabelludo como victoria, será para la siguiente”, reza el comunicado.

“Ejecutamos a ese hombre para demostrar que no sentimos respeto por la vida de los hipercivilizados universitarios ni de ningún otro”, se lee en su comunicado.

El grupo extremista ITS opera en México desde por lo menos el año 2009 y se ha enfocado en blancos vinculados a la ciencia o la comercialización de productos de origen animal, asesinando y utilizando explosivos caseros.

Según el diario Reforma, en un principio, acorde con informes de la Policía capitalina, se les clasificó junto a grupos subversivos y anarquistas, pero desde hace por lo menos tres años se les considera una agrupación radical diferente a los anarcos.

El ITS se autodenomina “individualista-terrorista”, y es partidario del “ecoextremismo”, una ideología radical que plantea “un rechazo violento al progreso humano, la ciencia y el pacifismo por considerar que destruye la Tierra y desaparece los instintos del individuo”. El cuerpo del trabajador fue hallado la noche del lunes pasado en un pasillo de la universidad, de acuerdo con los reportes de la Procuraduría General de Justicia de la Ciudad de México (PGJDF), “A cuidarse mejor, estudiantes, docentes, investigadores de la UNAM y otras universidades, que no dudaremos en atacar mortalmente de nuevo…”, afirmó la organización el miércoles.

Hoy por la mañana, en entrevista con el periodista Ciro Gómez Leyva, que se dio a través de misivas, el grupo advirtió que en sus próximas acciones tendrán la característica de que a sus víctimas les arrancarán el cuero cabelludo. El equipo de Ciro Gómez Leyva cuestionó al grupo sobre por qué matar, cuando han realizado otro tipo de acciones no tan radicales, a lo que les respondió que “¿por qué no?, ¿es un pecado, ¿es un delito, ¿está mal? seguro que más de uno dijo que sí. Respondemos para ser claros, nosotros matamos porque esto es una guerra”.

Y agregó que asesinaron al jefe de Servicios Químicos de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) “para recordarles que podemos atacar en cualquier momento a quien sea dentro de la universidad, para demostrarles que nuestros objetivos se han ampliado”.

Recordó que 2011 se dedicaron a atacar a los científicos e investigadores, ahora a todos los que integran la comunidad universitaria puede y son un objetivo en potencia por el simple hecho de formar parte de la comunidad estudiantil y progresista de la máxima casa de estudios.

“Advertimos meses pasados a las autoridades de la UNAM, advertimos que si nuestros ataques seguían siendo silenciados que se atuvieran a las consecuencias y el resultado fue la escandalosa muerte dentro de Ciudad Universitaria como escarmiento”, agregó el grupo en una carta. Indicó que a sus integrantes les da igual “que haya sido un trabajador, el mismo escándalo hubiera acontecido si hubiera sido un estudiante o un maestro, o en el mejor de los casos un investigador de renombre. El objetivo; la UNAM, fue golpeado de nueva cuenta, las autoridades desmoralizadas y nosotros con otra muerte más en nuestra historia”.

Apenas el 1 de Julio el Jefe de Gobierno de la Ciudad de México, Miguel Angel Mancera, durante una entrevista declaró que el crimen no puede ser relacionado directamente con ITS, pues no reúne las características de los objetivos de la agrupación, aunque ITS en la entrevista que dio a Radio Formula ya se había adelantado a las delacraciones de las autoridades con lo siguiente: “Ya sabemos que las autoridades capitalinas están preparando sus investigaciones tan torpes y faltas de argumentación como siempre para indicar que nosotros no fuimos para no alarmar más a la comunidad universitaria”.

El grupo aseguró que no piden nada, que no tienen exigencias o pliegos petitorios y cuestionaron si se podría negociar la pérdida de la raíces como humanos naturales que se resisten a la artificialidad de la civilización.

El ITS es un grupo radical que afirma ser “individualistas-terroristas con objetivos egóicos (sic), políticamente incorrectos, amorales e indiscriminados”, que asegura contar con células violentas como “Grupo Oculto Furia de Lince” y otras.

En diciembre de 2014, el periódico Milenio publicó un reportaje en el que cita documentos oficiales del Centro Nacional de Planeación, Análisis e Información para el Combate a la Delincuencia (Cenapi), en el que reconoce al ITS como un grupo subversivo que opera como “guerrilla urbana”, y que incluso sus actividades se han ampliado fuera del territorio nacial en este año, llegando a formar grupos en Chile y Argentina.

No es la primera vez que se adjudican hechos violentos: el 8 de noviembre de 2011 asesinaron de un disparo en la cabeza al catedrático especializado en biotecnología de la UNAM en Cuervanaca Morelos, también el 18 de mayo pasado, murió por heridas de bala el estudiante de Informática Ángel León de la Cruz, matriculado en el Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN). Las primeras versiones de su asesinato indicaban un intento de asalto, pero un grupo eco-extremista distinto a ITS se adjudicó en internet el crimen como un “atentado directo”. Asimismo, el 8 de agosto de 2011, el ITS dijo ser autor de la detonación de una bomba en el Área de Investigaciones de Nanotecnología del Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores Monterrey, campus Estado de México, donde resultaron con heridas graves el coordinador del Centro de Desarrollo Empresarial y el director del Doctorado en Ciencias de la Ingeniería y especialista en construcción de robots. En diversos blogs, supuestos integrantes de ese grupo también han reivindicado bombas afuera de universidades públicas y privadas, institutos científicos y oficinas de gobierno, cuyo objetivo es herir y matar a población civil.

(es-pt-it-en) Entrevista a Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje

Entrevista hecha a ITS-México el 01 de Julio 2016, por parte del medio periodístico “Radio Fórmula”. Quien cuestiona es el periodista Ciro Gómez Leyva. Todo esto a raíz del atentado homicidiario de la “Mafia Eco-extremista/Nihilista” de ITS, contra el jefe de la facultad de  química de la UNAM.

http://www.radioformula.com.mx/notas.asp?Idn=606512&idFC=2016&sURL=

Seguimiento de los actos de ITS aquí:

https://mega.nz/#!pk8UlTpB!tVANbcThPxekw_ElOsBRVMv0HNKILwINsYOzjiQK2Ig


-¿A qué se refieren con los ataques del 25 y el 8 de abril?
Aquí hay que aclarar una cosa, ITS NO fue responsable del ataque del 8 de Abril en C.U., fue otro grupo que comparte la misma tendencia del eco-extremismo, lo mencionamos en nuestro último comunicado para evidenciar que las autoridades universitarias acallaron dichos ataques.

Por otra parte, el ataque del 25 de Abril en C.U., fue parte de una coordinación entre grupos de ITS en México, Chile y Argentina.

Todo el mes de Abril lo dedicamos a esa coordinación de ataques, los cuales fueron:

– El 6 de Abril la “Horda Mística del Bosque”, abandonó un artefacto incendiario dentro de la Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas de la Universidad de Chile en Santiago, aunque el artefacto lo encontraron antes de activarse generó gran conmoción en la comunidad universitaria del país de los terremotos.

– El 12 de Abril el grupo “Ouroboros Silvestre”, detonó un explosivo frente a la Universidad de Ecatepec, en el Estado de México, este a escasos metros del palacio municipal ubicado en pleno centro San Cristóbal, en este caso el artefacto explotó exitosamente sin que se conocieran más detalles.

– Ese mismo día el mismo grupo abandonó un artefacto explosivo de activación electromecánica en la Comunidad Educativa Hispanoamericana en el mismo municipio. El artefacto le detonó a uno de los guardias de la institución al momento que lo levantó provocándole heridas, cosa que acallaron las autoridades educativas y los medios de comunicación locales, los cuales dijeron que el artefacto había detonado sin dejar heridos y solo daños materiales.

– EL 19 de Abril el “Grupo Oculto Furia de Lince” detonaron un artefacto explosivo casero en una de las entradas del Tec de Monterrey Campus Ciudad de México en Tlalpan, sin que se conocieran más detalles.

– El 21 de Abril el grupo “Constelaciones salvajes” abandonó un paquete-bomba dentro de la Universidad Tecnológica Nacional en Buenos Aires, Argentina, sin que supiera mayor detalle dado que las autoridades silenciaron el atentado.

– El 25 de Abril el “Grupo Oculto Furia de Lince”, abandonó un artefacto explosivo de activación electromecánica similar al que detonó en la Comunidad Educativa Hispanoamericana en Ecatepec, pero ahora en la Facultad de Arquitectura en C.U., sin que se conocieran más detalles.

– El mismo día, el mismo grupo abandonó otro artefacto explosivo con un mecanismo similar al otro pero en la Facultad de Ingeniería, específicamente en el edificio A, sin que se conocieran más detalles del mismo.

Todos estos actos los llevaron a cabo los grupos que se mencionaron y que están adheridos a ITS, y que los reivindicamos en nuestro séptimo comunicado el 9 de mayo pasado.

¿Contra quién atentaron?

Los ataques del 25 de Abril en C.U. en específico, fueron simbólica y materialmente contra la UNAM y contra cualquier universitario que se cruzara con los explosivos abandonados, es falsa la información que han desplegado algunos medios de comunicación en donde dicen que los ataques del 25 fueron específicamente en contra el jefe de servicios químicos, mentira.

-¿Cuantos objetivos más tienen?

Nuestro objetivo en concreto es la civilización en su totalidad, las universidades y empresas que generan esclavos para que este sistema siga creciendo, los centros comerciales e instituciones que llenan de basura las mentes de los borregos ciegos directo al matadero (con esto no estamos posicionándonos a favor de las sociedad, de la masa, la cual también contribuye a la destrucción de la Tierra con su simple existencia), atacamos los símbolos de la modernidad, de la religión, de la tecnología y del progreso, atentamos directamente contra los responsables de que esta mancha urbana siga creciendo y devorando los entornos silvestres que aún quedan.

En resumidas cuentas, nosotros, los eco-extremistas estamos en contra del progreso humano, el cual corrompe y degrada todo lo bello que hay en este mundo, el progreso todo lo vuelve artificial, mecánico, gris, triste, nosotros no soportamos eso, por eso es que le hemos declarado la guerra a esta civilización y a su asqueroso progreso desde hace unos años atrás.

-¿Nunca han detenido a un compañero suyo?
En 2011 después de “volar” a los dos catedráticos del Tec de Monterrey campus Atizapán, dijimos que la PGR y demás instituciones de seguridad eran una BURLA y lo seguimos diciendo, no hay, ni ha habido alguno de los nuestros detenido hasta ahora…

-¿Por qué matar?
¿Y porque no?, ¿es pecado?, ¿es un delito?, ¿está mal?, seguro que más de uno dijo que “Sí” en alguna de estas preguntas. Respondemos, para ser claros nosotros matamos porque esto es una GUERRA, por eso, porque no reconocemos más autoridad que la autoridad de nuestras deidades paganas relacionadas a la naturaleza y contrarias al catolicismo y al dios judaico, deidades personales que nos empujan a la confrontación. Matamos porque no reconocemos otra ley que no sean las leyes naturales que lo rigen TODO en este mundo muerto. Matamos porque rechazamos cualquier moral que nos quieran imponer, porque no lo consideramos ni “malo” ni “bueno”, sino como una respuesta desde nuestra individualidad a toda la destrucción que genera el progreso humano.

Dentro del espectro del terrorismo, matar puede ser una estrategia, un llamado, una advertencia para lo que quizás siga…

Pasando al tema central, asesinamos al jefe de servicios químicos de la UNAM para recordarles que podemos atacar en cualquier momento a quien sea dentro de la universidad, para demostrarles que nuestros objetivos se han ampliado, en 2011 nos dedicamos a atacar a los científicos e investigadores, ahora todos los que integran la comunidad universitaria pueden y son un objetivo en potencia, ¿porque?, por el simple hecho de formar parte de la comunidad estudiantil y progresista de la máxima casa de estudios.

Advertimos meses pasados a las autoridades de la UNAM, advertimos que si nuestros ataques seguían siendo silenciados que se atuvieran a las consecuencias, el resultado fue el escandaloso muerto dentro de Ciudad Universitaria como escarmiento.

Nos da igual que haya sido un trabajador, el mismo escandalo hubiera acontecido si el muerto hubiera sido un estudiante o un maestro, o en el mejor de los casos un investigador de renombre, el objetivo, la UNAM, fue golpeado de nueva cuenta, las autoridades desmoralizadas y nosotros con otra muerte en nuestra historia.

-¿Cómo comprueban que fueron ustedes?
Las pruebas están en los hechos, el cuerpo tenía sus pertenencias no fue un robo, el cuerpo fue localizado en un lugar en donde no hay cámaras, eso indica un ataque directo y no otra cosa, ya sabemos que las autoridades capitalinas están preparando sus “investigaciones” tan torpes y faltas de argumentación (como siempre), para indicar que nosotros no fuimos para no alarmar más a la comunidad universitaria.

Teníamos pensado arrancarle el cuero cabelludo como prueba pero no nos fue posible, como escribimos en el comunicado, será para el siguiente.

Usted y todos pueden pensar lo que quieran, que fue un robo, una venganza personal por personas de su barrio, que fue accidental, etc., pero nuestro historial no miente, no somos un grupo nuevo que sale de la nada, y ya ha sido evidenciado con esto y con otros actos que no nos andamos con bromas.

-Si no creen en un mejor mañana, ni son revolucionarios, ¿Qué piden? ¿Cuál es la finalidad de su lucha?
Nosotros no pedimos nada, no tenemos exigencias o “pliegos petitorios”, ¿se puede negociar la perdida de nuestras raíces como humanos naturales que se resisten a la artificialidad de la civilización? Claro que no, no hay negociación ni mesas de dialogo, ni nada de nada.

Nosotros no creemos en las revoluciones pues estás siempre van encaminadas a la “solución de problemas”, a construir algo nuevo y “mejor”, déjenos decirles que la era de las “revoluciones” y de los “revolucionarios” ha terminado, no existe “revolución” alguna que pueda cambiar una cosa negativa por una positiva porque hoy todo está corrompido, porque todo está a la venta, porque lo que rige el mundo en la actualidad no es el poder político sino el económico. Las revoluciones son cosas del pasado y lo hemos entendido muy bien.

Nosotros no queremos solucionar nada, ni proponemos nada a nadie, no queremos cambiar al mundo, ni queremos que se nos una la masa, basta ya de las utopías de secundaria, basta ya de tener en la cabeza que puede haber un mundo nuevo, mira a tu alrededor, el presente está plagado de horrores causados por la misma civilización, por la alienante realidad tecnológica (redes sociales, teléfonos), respira el espeso aire de esta sucia ciudad, mira las vías repletas de automóviles, observa la masa apretujándose en los camiones, en el metro, ve sus caras hartas de lo mismo, el poder económico lo tienen unos pocos, viven con lujos, se revuelcan en billetes y comodidades, los medios de comunicación están vendidos al mejor postor, y surgen los inconformes, y los desaparecen y los asesinan, la tensión social se agrava, y cuando parece que todo va a estallar, todo regresa a la normalidad, o a una normalidad alternativa, por eso nosotros dejamos de creer en un “mejor mañana” porque este presente decadente es lo único que tenemos, y en este presente solo vemos el progreso que avanza sin freno hacia el abismo civilizado.

La civilización está podrida, se corroe cada vez más pero sigue avanzando, que más quisiéramos nosotros que con nuestras propias manos hacerla colapsar, pero esa sería otra finalidad infantil.

Nosotros no apostamos por la caída de la civilización, ni tenemos como finalidad la destrucción de esta, que quede claro.

En el aspecto filosófico somos pesimistas, porque hemos visto que todo lo hermoso para nosotros, que es la naturaleza, se ha perdido, la han destruido y la siguen empujando a la extinción. No nos queda nada porque luchar, excepto por nuestras propias individualidades, nosotros seguimos siendo humanos antes que robots, somos la Naturaleza Salvaje que queda, lo último de lo último, nosotros nos seguimos considerando parte de la naturaleza y no los dueños, los eco-extremistas rescatamos nuestras raíces primitivas, y entre muchas otras cosas está la confrontación, el conflicto que nos ha identificado como gente de esta tierra, hijos del mezquite y del coyote, guerreando contra los que nos quieran domesticar, así como lo hicieron nuestros antepasados más salvajes al no permitir que se les sojuzgara por los europeos a su llegada a la Gran Chichimeca.

Los eco-extremistas somos animales domésticos con sus instintos aún vivos, para muchos seguro que es una “incoherencia” decir que estamos en contra de todo esto y seguir usando tecnología, respondemos que no dudamos en usarla para conseguir nuestros fines inmediatos, eso es un hecho, nos importa un comino caer en presuntas “incongruencias”, así como nos importa nada que nos consideren lo que sea.

Una de las finalidades de ITS y del eco-extremismo en si es el ataque, es devolver los golpes que le han dado a la naturaleza salvaje sin ser galardonados como “revolucionarios”, desinteresadamente guiados por un impulso egoísta.

Los eco-extremistas son como las abejas, las cuales entierran su aguijón para herir a su oponente  (la civilización) dando pelea sabiendo que morirán en el intento, ya que está claro que en esta guerra no saldremos victoriosos.

Esto te parecerá enfermos mentales o desequilibrados, pero mira, el eco-extremismo nihilista es una tendencia que prácticamente “nació” en México, y que algunos individualistas la han tomado como suya en Chile, Argentina y Europa, está claro que no somos los únicos locos…

Quizás hay más preguntas que respuestas, eso es lo único que diremos por ahora.

Lo hecho echo está.

¡Por la internacionalización mafia eco-extremista!

¡Por la defensa extrema de la naturaleza salvaje!

-Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje-México


Entrevista a Individualistas Tendendo ao Selvagem

O que vocês querem dizer com os ataques de 25 e de 8 de abril?

É preciso esclarecer uma coisa aqui, ITS NÃO foi responsável pelo ataque em 8 de abril na C.U., foi outro grupo que compartilha a mesma tendência do eco-extremismo, mencionamos ele em nosso último comunicado para evidenciar que as autoridades universitárias acalmaram ditos ataques.

Por outro lado, o ataque de 25 de abril na C.U., foi parte de uma coordenação entre grupos de ITS no México, Chile e Argentina.

Dedicamos todo o mês de abril a essa coordenação de ataques, os quais foram:

– Em 6 de abril a “Horda Mística do Bosque”, abandonou um artefato incendiário dentro da Faculdade de Ciências Físicas e Matemáticas da Universidade do Chile, em Santiago. Embora o artefato tenha sido encontrado antes de ser ativado, uma grande comoção foi gerada na comunidade universitária do país dos terremotos.

– Em 12 de abril o grupo “Ouroboros Silvestre”, detonou um explosivo em frente a Universidade de Ecatepec, no Estado do México, esta a poucos metros da Câmara Municipal localizada em pleno centro de San Cristóbal. Neste caso o artefato explodiu com sucesso sem que se soubessem mais detalhes.

– No mesmo dia o mesmo grupo abandonou um artefato explosivo de ativação eletromecânica na Comunidade Educativa Hispano-americana no mesmo município. O artefato detonou em um dos guardas da instituição no momento em que ele o ergueu e provocou-lhe ferimentos, acontecimento que as autoridades educativas e os meios de comunicação local acobertaram, os quais disseram que o artefato havia detonado sem deixar feridos e apenas danos materiais.

– Em 19 de abril o “Grupo Oculto Fúria de Lince” detonou um artefato explosivo caseiro em uma das entradas da Tec de Monterrey – Campus Cidade do México, em Tlalpan, sem que mais detalhes fossem conhecidos.

– Em 21 de abril o grupo “Constelações Selvagens” abandonou um pacote-bomba dentro da Universidade Tecnológica Nacional em Buenos Aireis, Argentina, sem que se soubessem maiores detalhes, pois as autoridades silenciaram o atentado.

– Em 25 de abril o “Grupo Oculto Fúria de Lince”, abandonou um artefato explosivo de ativação eletromecânica similar ao que detonou na Comunidade Educativa Hispano-americana em Ecatepec, mas dessa vez na Faculdade de Arquitetura na C.U., sem maiores detalhes.

– No mesmo dia, o mesmo grupo abandonou outro artefato explosivo com um mecanismo similar ao outro, mas, na faculdade de Engenharia, especificamente no edifício A, sem que mais detalhes fossem conhecidos.

Todos estes atos foram realizados pelos grupos mencionados e que estão associados a ITS, e que foram reivindicados em nosso Sétimo Comunicado em 9 de maio passado.

Contra quem atentaram?

Os ataques de 25 de abril na C.U., em particular, foram simbólicos e materiais contra a UNAM e contra qualquer universitário que cruzasse com os explosivos abandonados. É falsa a informação que propagaram alguns meios de comunicação onde dizem que os ataques de 25 foram especificamente contra o chefe de serviços químicos, é mentira.

Quantos mais objetivos vocês tem?

Nosso objetivo em específico é a civilização como um todo, as universidades e empresas que geram escravos para que este sistema continue a crescer, os shoppings e instituições que enchem de lixo as mentes das ovelhas cegas que rumam direto ao abate (com isso não estamos nos posicionando a favor da sociedade de massas, a qual também contribui com a destruição da Terra com a sua simples existência), atacamos os símbolos da modernidade, da religião, da tecnologia e do progresso, atentamos diretamente contra os responsáveis por esta mancha urbana que segue se expandindo e devorando os entornos silvestres que ainda restam. Em suma, nós, os eco-extremistas, estamos contra o progresso humano, o qual corrompe e destrói toda a beleza que há neste mundo, o progresso converte tudo em artificial, mecânico, cinzento, triste. Nós não suportamos isso e esse é o motivo pela qual declaramos guerra a esta civilização e seu asqueroso progresso já há alguns anos.

Nunca prenderam um companheiro de vocês?

Em 2011 depois de “mandar pelos ares” a dois professores da Tec de Monterrey – Campus Atizapán, dissemos que a PGR e demais instituições de segurança eram uma PIADA e ainda seguimos dizendo. Nenhum dos nossos foi detido até agora…

Por que matar?

E por que não? É pecado? É um crime? É errado? Com certeza mais de uma pessoa disse “sim” em alguma destas perguntas. Respondemos. Para ser claros, nós matamos porque isso é uma GUERRA, pelo motivo de não reconhecermos mais autoridade que a autoridade de nossas deidades pagãs relacionadas à natureza e contrárias ao catolicismo e ao deus judaico, deidades pessoais que nos empurram para o confronto. Matamos porque não reconhecemos outra lei a não ser as leis naturais que regem TUDO neste mundo morto. Matamos porque rechaçamos qualquer moral que nos queiram impor, porque não consideramos nem “mal” nem “bom”, mas sim uma resposta de nossa individualidade a toda a destruição que gera o progresso humano.

Dentro do espectro do terrorismo, matar pode ser uma estratégia, um chamado, uma advertência para o que talvez possa ocorrer…

Voltando ao tema central, assassinamos o chefe de serviços químicos da UNAM para lembrá-los que podemos atacar a qualquer momento a quem quer seja dentro da universidade, para mostrar que nossos objetivos foram ampliados. Em 2011 nos dedicamos a atacar os cientistas e investigadores, agora todos os que integram a comunidade universitária podem e são um objetivo potencial. Por quê? Pelo simples fato de serem parte da comunidade estudantil e progressista do mais alto local de estudos.

Advertimos meses atrás às autoridades da UNAM, advertimos que se nossos ataques permanecessem sendo silenciados teriam de enfrentar as consequências. O resultado foi a escandalosa morte dentro da Cidade Universitária como um aviso. Tanto faz para nós que tenha sido um trabalhador, o mesmo escândalo houvesse ocorrido se o morto fosse um estudante ou um professor, ou na melhor das hipóteses, um investigador renomado. O objetivo, a UNAM, foi atingido mais uma vez. As autoridades desmoralizadas e nós com mais uma morte em nossa história.

Como podem provar que foram vocês?

As provas estão nos fatos, o corpo tinha seus pertences, não foi um roubo. O corpo foi localizado em um lugar onde não há câmeras, isso indica um ataque direto e não outra coisa. Já sabemos que as autoridades da cidade estão preparando suas “investigações” torpes e com faltas de argumentação (como sempre) para indicar que não foi nós para não assustar ainda mais a comunidade universitária. Havíamos pensado em arrancar o couro cabeludo dele como prova, mas não foi possível. Como escrevemos no comunicado, fica para a próxima. Você e todos podem pensar o que quiserem, que foi um roubo, uma vingança pessoal por pessoas de seu bairro, que foi acidental, etc., mas a nossa história não mente, não somos um grupo novo que vem do nada, e já foi evidenciado com esse e com outros atos que não estamos de brincadeira.

Se não acreditam em um amanhã melhor nem são revolucionários, o que pedem? Qual é a finalidade de sua luta?

Nós não pedimos nada, não temos exigências ou “folhas de petição”. Se pode negociar a perda de nossas raízes como seres humanos naturais que estão resistindo à artificialidade da civilização? Claro que não, não há negociação nem mesas de diálogo ou qualquer outra coisa.

Nós não acreditamos nas revoluções, afinal sempre visam a “solução de problemas”, a construir algo novo e “melhor”. Deixe-nos dizer, a era das “revoluções” e dos “revolucionários” acabou, não existe “revolução” alguma que possa mudar uma coisa negativa por uma positiva porque hoje tudo está corrompido, porque tudo está à venda, porque o que rege o mundo na atualidade não é o poder político, mas o econômico. As revoluções são coisas do passado e nós entendemos isso muito bem.

Nós não queremos resolver nada, nem propomos nada a ninguém, não queremos mudar o mundo, nem queremos nos unir à massa. Chega das utopias secundárias, chega de ter em mente que possa haver um mundo novo. Olha ao seu redor, o presente está repleto de horrores causados pela mesma civilização, pela alienante realidade tecnológica (redes sociais, celulares, etc.), respira o espesso ar desta suja cidade, olha as pistas repletas de carros, observa a massa se espremendo nos ônibus, nos metrôs, veja suas caras cansadas da mesmice. O poder econômico poucos o tem, vivem no luxo, se afundam em notas e comodidades, os meios de comunicação estão vendidos à melhor oferta, e surgem os não-conformistas, e desaparecem com eles e os assassinam, a tensão social se agrava, e quando tudo parece que irá explodir, a normalidade retorna, ou tudo se vai a uma normalidade alternativa. Por isso nós deixamos de acreditar em um “amanhã melhor”, porque este presente decadente é o único que temos, e neste presente apenas vemos o progresso que avança sem freio em direção ao abismo civilizado.

A civilização está podre, cada vez mais se corrói, porém segue avançando. O que mais iríamos querer senão fazê-la colapsar com nossas próprias mãos? Mas isso seria outro propósito infantil.

Nós não apostamos na queda da civilização, nem temos como finalidade a destruição desta, que fique claro.

No aspecto filosófico somos pessimistas, porque vimos que todo o belo para nós, que é a natureza, se perdeu, a destruíram e seguem empurrando-a à extinção. Não nos resta nada pelo que lutar, exceto por nossas próprias individualidades. Nós seguimos sendo humanos ao invés de robôs, somos a Natureza Selvagem que resta, o último dos últimos, nós continuamos nos considerando parte da natureza e não os donos. Os eco-extremistas resgatamos nossas raízes primitivas, e entre muitas outras coisas está a confrontação, o conflito que nos identificou como pessoas desta terra, filhos da algaroba e do coiote, guerreando contra os que nos queiram domesticar, assim como fizeram nossos antepassados mais selvagens ao não permitir serem subjugados pelos europeus a sua chegada na Grande Chichimeca.

Os eco-extremistas somos animais domésticos com seus instintos ainda vivos. Para muitos é certeza que é uma “incoerência” dizer que estamos contra tudo isso e continuar usando tecnologia. Respondemos que não hesitamos em usá-la para conseguir nossos fins imediatos, isso é um fato, nós nos importamos com um caminho cair em supostas “inconsistências”, assim como não nos importamos com nada que nos considerem o que quer que seja.

Uma das finalidade de ITS e do eco-extremismo em si é o ataque, é devolver os golpes que deram à natureza selvagem sem ser homenageados como “revolucionários”, desinteressadamente guiados por um impulso egoísta.

Os eco-extremistas são como as abelhas, as quais fincam seu ferrão para ferir a seu oponente (a civilização), lutando sabendo que morrerão tentando, já que está claro que nesta guerra não sairemos vitoriosos.

Isso vai parecer que somos doentes mentais ou desequilibrados, mas olha, o eco-extremismo niilista é uma tendência que praticamente “nasceu” no México, e que alguns individualistas tomaram como sua no Chile, Argentina e Europa, está claro que não somos os únicos loucos…

Talvez há mais perguntas que respostas, isso é tudo que diremos por agora. O que está feito está feito.

Pela internalização da máfia eco-extremista!
Pela defesa extrema da natureza selvagem!

Individualistas Tendendo ao Selvagem – México


INTERVISTA CON LE ITS

-A che cosa vi riferite con gli attacchi del 25 e 8 aprile?

Chiariamo subito che ITS non è responsabile dell’attacco dell’8 Aprile nella Città Universitaria, è stato un altro gruppo che condivide la stessa Tendenza dell’Eco-Estremismo. Questo lo abbiamo menzionato nel nostro ultimo comunicato per evidenziare che le autorità universitarie hanno censurato gli attacchi.

D’altra parte, l’attacco del 25 Aprile nella Città Universitaria, è stato parte di una coordinazione tra gruppi di ITS in Messico, Cile e Argentina.

Tutto il mese di Aprile lo abbiamo dedicato alla coordinazione degli attacchi, che sono stati:

– il 6 Aprile l”Orda Mistica del Bosco”, ha abbandonato un artefatto incendiario-trovato prima di attivarsi- dentro la Facoltà di Scienza Fisica e Matematica dell’Università del cile a Santiago,e che ha generato gran confusione nella comunità universitaria del paese dei terremoti.

– Il 12 Aprile il gruppo “Uroboro Silvestre”, ha detonato un ordigno esplosivo di fronte all’Università di Ecatepec, nello Stato del Messico, questo a pochi metri dal palazzo municipale ubicato in pieno centro di San Cristobal. In questo caso l’artefatto è esploso con successo, senza per altro conoscerne i dettagli.

– Sempre quel giorno lo stesso gruppo ha abbandonato un artefatto esplosivo di attivazione elettromeccanica nella Comunità Educativa Ispano-americana nel medesimo municipio. L’artefatto è esploso quando una guardia dell’istituzione l’ha alzato, provocandogli ferite. Le autorità educative e i mezzi di comunicazione locali hanno censurato tutto questo, affermando che l’artefatto è esploso producendo solo danni materiali, ma senza fare feriti.

– Il 19 Aprile il “Gruppo Occulto Furia di Lince” ha detonato un artefatto esplosivo “casero” in una delle entrate del Tec del Campus di Monterrey -Città del Messico -Tlalpan, senza per altro conoscerne i dettagli.

– Il 21 Aprile il gruppo “Costellazioni selvagge” ha abbandonato un pacchetto-bomba dentro l’Università Tecnologica Nazionale a Buenos Aires, Argentina, senza che si possano sapere maggiori dettagli dato che le autorità hanno censurato l’Attentato.

– Il 25 Aprile il “Gruppo Occulto Furia di Lince”, ha abbandonato un artefatto esplosivo di attivazione elettromeccanica simile a quello esploso nella Comunità Educativa Ispano-americana in Ecatepec, ma nella Facoltà di Architettura nella Città Universitaria, senza che si possa conoscerne i dettagli.

– Nel medesimo giorno, lo stesso gruppo ha abbandonato un altro artefatto esplosivo con un meccanismo simile all’altro ma nella Facoltà di Ingegneria, specificamente nell’edificio A, senza che si possa conoscerne i dettagli.

Nel settimo comunicato del 9maggio, sono stati rivendicati tutti questi atti, portati a termine dai gruppi sopra menzionati e che hanno aderito alle ITS.

Contro chi avete Attentato?

Gli attacchi del 25 Aprile nella Città Universitaria -in specifico- furono simbolici e materialmente contro l’UNAM e contro qualunque universitario avesse incrociato gli esplosivi abbandonati. È falsa l’informazione data da alcuni mezzi di comunicazione dove affermano che gli attacchi del 25 furono specificamente contro il capo degli “uffici” chimici.

-Quanti obiettivi avete?

Il nostro obiettivo in concreto è la civilizzazione nella sua totalità, le università e imprese che generano schiavi affinché questo sistema continui a crescere, i centri commerciali e le istituzioni che riempiono di spazzatura le menti degli agnellini ciechi diretti al mattatoio ( con questo non ci stiamo ponendo a beneficio delle società, della massa, dato che anch’essa contribuisce alla distruzione della Terra con la sua semplice esistenza). Attacchiamo i simboli della modernità, della religione, della tecnologia e del progresso. Attentiamo direttamente i responsabili di questa macchia urbana che continua a crescere, e che divora gli ambienti silvestri che ancora resistono.

A conti fatti, noi Eco-Estremisti siamo contro il progresso umano, il quale corrompe e degrada tutta il bello che c’è in questo mondo. Siamo contro tutto il progresso che diviene artificiale, meccanico, grigio, triste. Noi non sopportiamo questo, ed è per questo motivo – da alcuni anni- che abbiamo dichiarato guerra alla civilizzazione e il suo schifoso progresso.

 -Non hanno mai arrestato un vostro compagno?

Nel 2011 dopo aver fatto “saltare“ due professori universitari del Tec di Monterrey nel campus di Atizapán, abbiamo affermato che la PGR ed altre istituzioni di sicurezza sono uno Scherzo, e continuiamo a dirlo. Non c’è, né è stato arrestato nessuno dei Nostri fino ad ora..

-Perché ammazzare?

E perché no? È peccato? È un delitto? È il male? Di Sicuro c’è più di un “Sì” in alcune di queste domande. Rispondiamo, per essere chiari, che ammazziamo perché questa è una GUERRA, per questo, perché non riconosciamo nessuna autorità, al di fuori dell’autorità delle nostre divinità pagane relazionate alla natura e contrarie al cattolicesimo e al dio giudaico, divinità personali che ci spingono all’affronto.

Ammazziamo perché non riconosciamo un’altra legge che non siano le leggi naturali, è che disciplinano TUTTO in questo mondo morto. Ammazziamo perché respingiamo qualunque morale imposta, perché non  consideriamo ammazzare né “brutto” né “buono”, bensì una risposta delle nostre individualità a tutta la distruzione che genera il progresso umano.

Dentro la vasta gamma del Terrorismo, ammazzare può essere una strategia, una chiamata, un’avvertenza per quello che magari succederà..

Passando al tema centrale, assassiniamo il capo degli “uffici” chimici dell’UNAM per ricordare loro che possiamo attaccare in qualunque momento chi è dentro l’università, per dimostrare loro che i nostri obiettivi si sono ampliati: Nel 2011 ci eravamo dedicati ad attaccare gli scienziati e i ricercatori. Ora-tutti quelli che integrano la comunità universitaria possono e sono un obiettivo in potenza. Perché? Per il semplice fatto di essere parte della comunità studentesca e progressista, provenienti dallo stesso principio istitutivo.

Abbiamo avvertito nei mesi passati le autorità dell’UNAM, e abbiamo notato che i nostri attacchi continuavano a essere censurati. Ora- che si conformassero alle conseguenze, dato che il risultato è stato -come monito – l’oltraggioso morto dentro la Città Universitaria.
Per noi non cambia nulla, se il morto è stato un lavoratore, lo stesso oltraggio sarebbe accaduto se il morto fosse stato uno studente o un maestro, o al meglio un ricercatore famoso. L’obiettivo- l’UNAM- è stato colpito ancora con un’altra morte nella nostra storia, e le autorità sono rimaste fottute di nuovo.

-Come fanno a comprovare che siete stati voi?

Le prove sono dentro i fatti. Il corpo, aveva adosso i suoi effetti personali, non è stato un furto. Il “morto” è stato localizzato in un luogo, dove non ci sono camere. Questo indica un attacco diretto e non qualcos’altro. Sappiamo già che le autorità capitoline stanno preparando le loro “investigazioni” tanto rozze e mancanti di argomentazione (come sempre), per indicare che non siamo stati noi ad aver agitato,e questo per non allarmare di più la comunità universitaria.

Come scritto nel comunicato, la nostra idea era quella di strappargli il cuoio capelluto come prova, ma non è stato possibile, sarà per la prossima volta.

Te e tutti gli altri, potete pensare quello che volete: che è stato un furto, una vendetta personale da parte di alcuni abitanti del suo quartiere, che è stato accidentale, etc… ma il nostro curriculum non mente, non siamo un gruppo nuovo che esce dal niente, è evidente che con questo omicidio e gli altri attentati, non scherziamo.

-Se non credete in un domani migliore, né siete rivoluzionari. Che cosa chiedete? Qual’è la finalità della vostra lotta?

Non chiediamo niente, non abbiamo esigenze o “petizioni”. Può essere negoziabile la perdita delle nostre radici come umani naturali che resistono all’artificialità della civilizzazione? Chiaramente no, non ci sono negoziazioni né tavoli di dialogo, né niente di niente.

Noi non crediamo nelle rivoluzioni , che si avviano sempre verso la “soluzione dei problemi”, per costruire qualcosa di nuovo e o di “meglio”. Lasciaci dire che l’era delle “rivoluzioni” e dei “rivoluzionari” è finita. Non esiste “rivoluzione” alcuna che possa cambiare il negativo con il positivo, perché oggi tutto è corrotto, perché tutto è in vendita, perché il mondo Ora è diretto non dal potere politico ma da quello economico. Le rivoluzioni sono il “passato” e noi l’abbiamo capito molto bene.

Noi non vogliamo risolvere niente, né proponiamo niente a nessuno, non vogliamo cambiare il mondo, né vogliamo che si unisca a noi la massa. Basta “vedere” attraverso le utopie, basta credere o pensare che ci possa essere un mondo nuovo. Guarda intorno a te, il presente è piagato dagli orrori causati dalla stessa civilizzazione, dall’alienante realtà tecnologica (reti sociali – telefoni), mentre si respira la spessa aria di una sporca città, mentre si guardano le vie strapiene di automobili, si osserva la massa pressata dentro gli autobus, nella metro, e i loro visi annoiati. Il potere economico è per pochi,che vivono nel lusso, hanno in mano soldi e comodità. I mezzi di comunicazione sono venduti al migliore offerente. Quando escono i disaccordi, la tensione si aggrava, arrivano gli assassini e le sparizioni, e quando sembra tutto esplodere, tutto torna normale, o a una normalità alternativa. Per questo motivo abbiamo smesso di credere in un “migliore domani”, perché il presente decadente, è l’unico che abbiamo,e per questo al presente, vediamo solo come il progresso avanza senza freni verso l’abisso civilizzato.

La civilizzazione è putrefatta, si corrode sempre di più ma continua ad avanzare. Per questo pensare di farla collassare con le nostre mani, è un’infantile finalità.

Che sia chiaro,noi non facciamo scommesse sulla caduta della civilizzazione, né abbiamo come finalità la distruzione della stessa.

Dal punto di vista filosofico siamo pessimisti, perché abbiamo visto che tutto il bello, che per noi è la natura, si è perso, è stato distrutto ed è spinto verso l’estinzione.

Eccetto che per noi come individualità,non ci resta che lottare. Siamo prima esseri umani che robot, siamo la Natura Selvaggia che rimane, gli ultimi dell’ultimo. Noi ci consideriamo parte della natura e non i padroni. Gli Eco-Estremisti riscattano le loro radici primitive, con il conflitto, e questo ci identifica come gente di questa terra, figli del mezquite e del coyote. In guerra contro quelli che ci vogliano addomesticare, come lo fecero i nostri antenati più selvaggi non permettendo di essere soggiogati dagli europei al loro arrivo nella Gran Chichimeca

Gli Eco- Estremisti sono animali domestici con i loro istinti ancora vivi. Per molti sicuramente è “incoerenza” affermare che siamo contro di tutto questo, se continuiamo a usare la tecnologia. Rispondiamo che non abbiamo dubbi nell’usarla per ottenere i nostri fini immediati, e questo è un fatto. Non ci importa un cazzo di cadere in presunte “incongruenze”, l’importante è essere considerati per quello che siamo.

Una delle finalità in sé delle ITS e dell’Eco-Estremismo è l’Attacco, per restituire i colpi che la Natura Selvaggia subisce. Siamo specificatamente guidati dai nostri impulsi Egoisti, e disinteressati al ruolo di “rivoluzionari”.

Gli Eco-estremisti sono come le api: seppelliscono il loro pungiglione per ferire il loro rivale (la civilizzazione) andando allo scontro, sapendo di morire nel tentativo. Poiché è chiaro che in questa guerra non usciremo vittoriosi.

Ti sembrerà un discorso da malati mentali o squilibrati, ma vedi, l’Eco-Estremismo Nichilista è una tendenza che è “nata”- in pratica- in Messico, ed è stata presa in maniera propria dagli Individualisti in Cile, Argentina ed Europa. Chiaramente non siamo gli unici matti…

Ci sono magari più domande che risposte, ma questo è tutto.
Ciò che fatto è fatto. (vedere done)

Per l’internazionalizzazione della Mafia-Eco Estremista!
Per la difesa estrema della Natura Selvaggia!

Individualisti Tendenti al Selvaggio-Messico


Mexican Press Interviews ITS

Interview of the In the Morning (Por La Mañana – EPM) Team with the group, “Individualists Tending Toward the Wild” after its taking responsibility for the murder of José Jaime Barrera Moreno, Head of Services in the Department of Chemistry of the UNAM (National Autonomous University of Mexico)

Found on the Facebook page of Ciro Gómez Leyva, a Mexican journalist

July 1st , 2016

EPM: Why kill?

ITS: Why not? Is it a sin? A crime? Is it bad? Someone certainly said, “yes” to one of those questions.
We respond to be clear that we kill because this is WAR. We do not recognize any other authority but the authority of our pagan deities tied to nature and who against Catholicism and the Judeo-Christian god. These gods push us toward confrontation.
We kill because we do not recognize any other law but the natural laws that govern the whole of this dead world. We kill because we reject all morality that they seek to impose on us. We kill because we consider it neither “good” nor evil” but rather it is a response from our individuality to all of the destruction that human progress generates. Within the specter of terrorism, killing can be a strategy, a call, or a warning for what will follow…

Getting to the main point, we killed the head of Chemical Services of the UNAM to remind people that we can attack anyone at anytime within this university. It is to show that our objectives have widened since 2011. At that time, we targeted the scientists and investigators. Today the entire university community can be and are the target. Why? For the mere reason that they form part of the student community of this institution of higher education devoted to progress.

We warned the UNAM authorities in past months that if our actions continued to be silenced, there would be consequences. The result was this scandalous death within the University City that serves as a lesson. It doesn’t matter to us that it was just a worker. It would have been the same to us if it had been a student, or a teacher, or best case scenario, a renowned scientist. The real target, the UNAM, was struck again, the authorities are demoralized by it, and we have another death to our name.

EPM: How can you prove that this was done by your group?

ITS: The proof is in the facts of the case. There was nothing missing off of his person. It wasn’t a robbery. The body was found in a place where there were no cameras. This indicates a direct assault and that’s it. We know that the Mexico City police is already preparing its incompetent and idiotic “investigation” (like always) to indicate that it wasn’t us in order to not cause alarm among the university community.

We thought of scalping him as proof but that wasn’t possible at the time. As we wrote in our communiqué, that’ll be for next time. You and everyone else can’t think what you like, that it was a common mugging, a personal vendetta by people from his neighborhood, that it was a mistake, etc. But our record doesn’t lie. This isn’t our first time doing this, we have a reputation. We have demonstrated with this and other actions that we aren’t playing around.

EPM: How many targets do you have?

ITS: Our concrete target is all of civilization, the universities and companies that train slaves so that this system keeps growing, as well as malls and institutions that fill minds with garbage and make sheep that go directly to the slaughter. (By that statement we aren’t supporting “mass society,” which by its very existence threatens the Earth with destruction.) We attack the symbols of modernity, religion, technology, and progress. We attack directly those who are responsible for the spread of the urban stain that swallows up the last surviving wild places.

In summary, we, the eco-extremists, are against human progress that corrupts and degrades all that is beautiful in this world: that progress that makes everything artificial, mechanical, gray, and sad. We don’t tolerate it, so we have been at war with this civilization and disgusting progress for some years now.

EPM: They’ve never arrested anyone from your group?

ITS: In 2011, after blowing up two investigators from the Tec of Monterrey Atizapán Campus, we said that the PGR (The Office of the Attorney General) and the other security institutions were a JOKE, and we’ll keep saying it. Up until now, no one from our group has ever been arrested.

EPM: To what are you referring when you mention the attacks of April 25th and 8th?

ITS: We have to clarify here that ITS was NOT responsible for the attack on April 8th at the University City. This was the work of another eco-extremist group from our tendency, and we mentioned it in our last communiqué to show that the university authorities silenced these attacks. On the other hand, the April 25th attack was part of a coordinated operation of ITS groups in Mexico, Chile, and Argentina, namely:

-April 6th: The “Mystical Horde of the Forest” abandoned an explosive device in the Department of Physical Sciences and Mathematics at the University of Chile in Santiago, although they found the device before it exploded. This generated a great deal of commotion among the university community in the country of earthquakes.

-April 12th: The group, “Ouroboros Silvestre” detonated an explosive in front of the University of Ecatepec in Mexico State, only a few meters from the Municipal Palace in downtown San Cristóbal. The device exploded but no further details are known.
The same day the same group abandoned a timed explosive device in the Comunidad Educativa Hispanoamericana in the same municipality. The device exploded and wounded one of the security guards at the institution when he picked it up. This act was silenced by the media and the authorities of the municipality, who stated that the device exploded without any causalities and only resulted in material damages.

-April 19th: The Group “Fury of the Lynx” detonated a homemade explosive device at one of the entrances of the Tec de Monterrey Mexico City Campus in Tlalpan, without more details being known.

-April 21st: The Group, “Wild Constellations” abandoned a package bomb within the National Technological University in Buenos Aires, Argentina. No further details are known due to the silencing of the action by the authorities.

-April 25th: The “Hidden Fury of the Lynx” group abandoned a timed explosive device also at the Comunidad Educativa Hispanoamericana in Ecatepec, but this time in the Architecture Department, which detonated but no further details are known.
The same day, the same group abandoned an explosive device of similar mak in the Engineering Department, specifically in A Building, but further details are not known. All of these attacks were carried out by groups affiliated with ITS and responsibility was taken for them in our seventh communiqué.

EPM: Who were you attacking?

The April 25th attacks in the University City in particular were symbolically and materially against the UNAM and any person in that university who happened to be in the vicinity when the explosives detonated. It’s false what the media is reporting, namely, that the April 25th attacks were against the Chief of Chemical Services in particular. That’s a lie.

EPM: If you don’t believe in a better tomorrow, and are not revolutionaries, what are you asking for? What is the goal of your struggle?

We’re not asking for anything. We don’t have demands and we aren’t petitioning for anything. Can we negotiate concerning the loss of our natural human roots that resists the artificiality of civilization? Of course not. There’s no negotiation here or roundtable talks, none of that. We don’t believe in revolutions because these are always directed to “solving problems, to constructing something “newer and better”. Let’s just say that the era of “revolutions” and “revolutionaries” is over. There is no “revolution” that can change a negative thing into a positive one since all today is corrupted. Everything’s for sale, because what drives the world today is not political but economic power. Revolutions are a thing of the past, and we’ve understood this quite well. We don’t want to solve any problems here, we aren’t proposing anything to anyone. We aren’t trying to change the world, and we don’t want the masses to join us. Enough with the bargain basement utopias! Enough with the thinking that we can have a better world! Look around you, we are surrounded by the horrors created by this civilization, by an alienating technological reality (social media, telephones). We breathe the thick air of this dirty city. The roads full of cars; see the masses pressed up against each other on buses and on the metro. You can see on their faces that they’ve had it up to here with more of the same. Economic power is had by the few; they live in luxury and are surrounded by money and comfort. The media is sold to the highest bidder. If people protest, they are disappeared and killed. Social tensions heighten, and when it seems like things are finally going to explode, it all returns to normal, or another kind of “normal” at the most. That’s why we’ve stopped believing in a better tomorrow, because the decadent present is all we have, and in the present, all that we see is progress without brakes leading us over the civilized cliff.

Civilization is rotten and it keeps corroding but advancing at the same time. We would love it if we could make it collapse with our own hands, but that would be another childish desire. We’re not betting on the collapse of civilization, nor is its destruction one of our goals. Let that be clear.

On the philosophical front we are pessimists since we have seen all that is beautiful to us, namely nature, be lost, and it is being pushed closer to extinction. There’s nothing for us to fight for, except for our own individualities. We continue to be human and not robots. We are the Wild Nature that is left, the last of the last. We continue to consider ourselves part of nature and not its owner. We eco-extremists are rescuing our primitive roots. Among these is confrontation, the struggle that has identified us as the people of this land, sons of the mesquite and the coyote. We are at war with those who seek to domesticate us, just as our wildest ancestors were, who did not allow themselves to be subjugated by the Europeans who invaded the Gran Chichimeca.

Eco-extremists are domesticated animals who still retain their instincts. For most this will surely be “incoherent” as we say all this yet still use technology. We state that we don’t hesitate to use it to achieve our immediate goals. This is a fact, it doesn’t matter to us one bit if we fall into “inconsistencies” here. We don’t care what anyone thinks, really. One of ITS and eco-extremism’s goals is attack, it’s to return the blows that Wild Nature has received without fashioning ourselves as “revolutionaries”. We do this disinterestedly guided by our egoist impulses. Eco-extremists are like the bees that sting leaving the stinger in the victim, knowing that they will die in the process. In this case, the victim is civilization, and we know that we aren’t going to come out of this war victorious.

This will seem to you like we are “mentally disturbed or unbalanced”, but look, nihilist eco-extremism is a tendency that was practically born in Mexico. It has since been taken up by individualists in Chile, Argentina, and Europe. So we’re not the only crazy ones here at least.

Perhaps this leaves more questions than answers at this point, but one thing is clear: what’s done is done.

For the internationalization of the Eco-extremist Mafia! For the extreme defense of Wild Nature! Death to the hyper-civilized!

-Individualists Tending Toward the Wild – Mexico

PGR reservó información sobre grupo que se adjudica homicidio de empleado de la UNAM

Nota de la presa mexicana sobre el atentado homicidiario de ITS “Mafia Eco-extremista/Nihilista”.


30 de junio 2016

Este grupo es responsable de por lo menos una docena de atentados cometidos entre 2011 y 2013 que incluyen paquetes explosivos y cartas bomba, que han dejado varios heridos y muertos.

La Procuraduría General de la República (PGR), tiene reservada por doce años la información relacionada con el grupo subversivo o eco-extremista denominado “Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje” (ITS), que se atribuye el asesinato del Jefe de Servicios Químicos, de la Facultad de Química de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

De acuerdo con una solicitud de acceso a la información, la PGR tiene iniciada una averiguación previa en contra de dicho grupo, por parte de la Subprocuraduría Especializada en Investigación de Delincuencia Organizada (Seido), por lo que la información se encuentra reservada.

Incluso la Policía Federal (PF) que depende de la Comisión Nacional de Seguridad (CNS), reconoce que participó en una investigación contra dicho grupo ordenada por el Ministerio Público de la Federación y de igual forma señala que la información sobre la misma ésta reservada por estar dentro de una averiguación previa.

La PGR tampoco precisa si consigno la averiguación o esta sigue abierta, aunque señala que tiene que ver con hechos ocurridos en 2011, año en el que este grupo inició sus actividades y se adjudicó atentados y homicidios en contra de catedráticos de diversas casas de estudio en el país.

Mientras que la Secretaria de Gobernación (Segob), señaló, en respuesta a otra solicitud de acceso a la información, que no tiene en sus archivos datos sobre el ITS u otras organizaciones similares.

En contraste el Centro de Investigación y Seguridad Nacional (Cisen), que depende de la Segob, respondió a otra solicitud de acceso a la información, que con información proporcionada por los mismos grupos, se han detectado 17 grupos que se autodenominan “anarquistas” y “eco-extremistas”.

Según sus propias referencias informativas, estos grupos dicen tener presencia en 14 estados; Aguascalientes, Chiapas, Ciudad de México, Estado de México, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Veracruz y Zacatecas.

Igualmente el Cisen revela los nombres de estos grupos de acuerdo a sus propias referencias; entre ellos Reacción Salvaje. Este grupo ésta relacionado con “Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje”, y se autodefinen como grupos “eco-extremistas”.

ITS ha anunciado a través de diversos comunicados, que ha iniciado una nueva guerra abierta en contra del sistema tecnoindustrial y subraya la fusión de al menos una docena de células con capacidad operativa en por lo menos 11 entidades del país, incluida la Ciudad de México.

Este grupo es responsable de por lo menos una docena de atentados cometidos entre 2011 y 2013 que incluyen paquetes explosivos y cartas bomba, que han dejado varios heridos y muertos.

Según ellos, forman parte de un grupo internacional que se inició en México y se ésta extendiendo en varias partes del mundo comenzando por Chile hacia Argentina, según ellos están en contra de quienes promueven el desarrollo tecnológico.

Eco-extremistas se atribuyen crimen en Facultad de Química de CU

Desde la prensa mexicana:

29 de junio

Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje es el nombre del grupo; advirtieron que habrá más ataques

La noche del lunes 27 de junio, José “N” fue asesinado al salir de su empleo en Ciudad Universitaria, afuera de la Facultad de Química de la UNAM. De acuerdo con las primeras investigaciones, el o los homicidas le clavaron un cuchillo en el pecho. Este miércoles, sus presuntos asesinos difundieron el detalle del ataque, mediante un comunicado en el que se hacen llamar ‘Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje” (ITS).

Y aunque esta no es la primera vez que se adjudica un asesinato, este grupo de ‘eco-extremistas’ advierte que habrá más atentados.

“…nuestro cuchillo perforó su carne, músculos y venas, desangrándolo y dejándolo sin vida. Es una pena que no le pudiéramos arrancar el cuero cabelludo como victoria (así como lo hacían nuestros antepasados en guerra), será para el siguiente…”, detalló este grupo radical en un comunicado que circula en internet en foros cerrados con coincidencias “ideológicas”.

El grupo

‘Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje’ (ITS) se adjudicó el asesinato de José “N”, de 50 años de edad, quien hasta el pasado 27 de junio trabajaba en la jefatura de Servicios de la Facultad de Química de la Máxima Casa de Estudios.

Los autodenominados ‘eco-extremistas’ no detallan por qué escogieron a José “N” como víctima, pero sí explican por qué en Ciudad Universitaria.

“…una de las cunas del progreso humano, lugar donde se forjan las engreídas mentes profesionales que se han propuesto la vil finalidad de construir un ‘mejor mañana’”.

El problema, advirtieron en su comunicado, es que ellos no creen en un “mejor mañana”, ni en la revolución, ni en el anarquismo, ni en la izquierda.

Según la misiva, su objetivo es vengarse de quien ha atentado contra la tierra, por lo que el asesinato del trabajador de la UNAM, así como de otros académicos y estudiantes, se ha convertido en “una ofrenda de sangre para la Naturaleza Salvaje”.

“Nadie, ninguna persona dentro de esta pútrida civilización merece consideración, y menos los apestosos progresistas y humanistas que se esconden en las facultades de esta universidad y de otras (…) A cuidarse mejor, estudiantes, docentes, investigadores de la UNAM y otras universidades, que no dudaremos en atacar mortalmente de nuevo…”, advirtieron.

Un asesinato no podría ser ocultado por las autoridades de la Universidad, ni de la Ciudad de México, como pasó con otros dos “atentados” el 25 de abril pasado y que fueron perpetrados por “Grupo Oculto Furia de Lince”, aseguraron los eco-terroristas.

“…las autoridades acallaron sus ataques. Ahora no van a poder acallar esto…”, escribieron.

Esa referencia es a un explosivo de activación electromecánica que fue hallado en el estacionamiento de la Facultad de Arquitectura. Ese mismo día, otro artefacto de las mismas características fue abandonado en la entrada del Edificio A de la Facultad de Ingeniería.

¿Quiénes son los eco-terroristas?

El 26 de enero de este año y a manera de relanzamiento, la organización difundió un primer comunicado.

“Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje, es la continuación del proyecto eco-terrorista comenzado en el año 2011. Después de la muerte de Reacción Salvaje en 2015, hemos decidido seguir…”, dijeron en su publicación.

En el mismo documento descartaron ser revolucionarios, anarquistas, izquierdistas o primitivistas. Simplemente dijeron ser defensores de la Naturaleza Salvaje.

“Adelante con la Guerra contra el Sistema Tecnológico y la Civilización! Si ellos no respetan la Tierra, nosotros tampoco respetaremos sus vidas! Muerte al Progreso, a las Ciencias Avanzadas y a la Modernidad, cáncer infecto que amenaza nuestras vidas y entornos!”, aseguraron.

La organización también enlistó una serie de hechos los cuales se adjudicaron y entre los que destaca el asesinato del investigador del Instituto de Biotecnología de la UNAM, Ernesto Méndez Salinas, en 2011, quien fue ultimado de un disparo en la cabeza mientras circulaba en su automóvil en una avenida principal de Cuernavaca Morelos.

En aquella ocasión las autoridades anunciaron que las líneas de investigación eran “robo” o simplemente una persecución para causarle un daño deliberado.

La misma organización se ha adjudicado ataques en centros de enseñanza en el Estado de México, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Morelos y recientemente en Jalisco.

La existencia de este grupo ha sido reconocida hasta ahora por las autoridades del Estado de México, que tras el ataque al Tec de Monterrey, campus Atizapán en agosto de 2011, cuando hicieron estallar un artefacto hiriendo a Armando Herrera Corral, coordinador del Centro de Desarrollo Empresarial y Transferencia de Tecnología, y a otro científico, Alejandro Aceves López.

El entonces procurador mexiquense, Alfredo Castillo Cervantes, declaró en aquella ocasión que se había “identificado como probables responsables a un grupo denominado Individualidades Tendiendo a lo Salvaje, por sus siglas ITS”.

La prensa solicitó información a la UNAM sobre el asesinato en sus instalaciones y sobre las amenazas de éstos grupos; y a la Procuraduría de Justicia de la Ciudad de México que lleva el caso y que investiga la identidad y responsabilidad del asesinato de José

https://www.gcmx.mx/eco-terroristas-asesinan-a-trabajador-la-unam-demostrar-salvajismo/

(es-it-en-pt-tü-ch) REIVINDICACIÓN DEL ASESINATO DE TRABAJADOR DE LA UNAM: DECIMO COMUNICADO DE INDIVIDUALISTAS TENDIENDO A LO SALVAJE

Comunicado publicado el 29 de junio 2016.

Imagenes acá: https://mega.nz/#!pk8UlTpB!tVANbcThPxekw_ElOsBRVMv0HNKILwINsYOzjiQK2Ig

Comunicado de ITS-México haciéndose responsable del asesinato de un trabajador de la UNAM ocurrido ayer por la noche.

Fotos aca:

https://mega.nz/#!pk8UlTpB!tVANbcThPxekw_ElOsBRVMv0HNKILwINsYOzjiQK2Ig

¡Muerte a los hiper-civilizados!

¡Complicidad con la Mafia Eco-extremista/Nihilista!


Anduvimos de caza, la noche de ayer nos convertimos en lobos, nuestra sed de sangre se sació por unos momentos, mientras los demonios de nuestros antepasados se apoderaban de nuestras mentes y de nuestros cuerpos.

Merodeamos Ciudad Universitaria, una de las cunas del progreso humano, lugar donde se forjan las engreídas  mentes profesionales que se han propuesto la vil finalidad de construir un “mejor mañana”, ese “mejor mañana” que está manchado por la destrucción de la Tierra, por la desaparición de los instintos del individuo y por la domesticación de especies.

Nosotros NO creemos en un “mejor mañana”, no somos “revolucionarios” ni nos identificamos con sus ideologías recicladas, somos individualistas-terroristas con objetivos egóicos, políticamente incorrectos, amorales e indiscriminados.

Ciudad Universitaria, lugar en donde últimamente el “Grupo Oculto Furia de Lince” de ITS, y el grupo “Guerra Eco-extremista Guamera” habían atentado, (el 25 y el 8 de Abril de este año respectivamente),  y que las autoridades acallaron sus ataques. Ahora no van a poder acallar esto…

Apuñalamos ayer al jefe de servicios químicos de la Facultad de Química de UNAM,  nuestro cuchillo perforó su carne, músculos y venas, desangrándolo y dejándolo sin vida. Es una pena que no le pudiéramos arrancar el cuero cabelludo como victoria (así como lo hacían nuestros antepasados en guerra), será para el siguiente…

Ya lo habíamos dicho en nuestro primer comunicado en enero de este año, “los heridos y muertos que causemos serán una ofrenda de sangre para la Naturaleza Salvaje”, y no bromeábamos. Ejecutamos a este hombre para demostrar que NO sentimos respeto por la vida de los híper-civilizados universitarios ni de ningún otro, que DESPRESIAMOS sus rutinas, sus normas y su moral, que RECHAZAMOS la igualdad, el progreso humano, la tolerancia, la ciencia, el colectivismo, el cristianismo, el pacifismo, la modernidad y demás cagadas que huelan a domesticación civilizada.

Nadie, ninguna persona dentro de esta pútrida civilización merece consideración, y menos los apestosos progresistas y humanistas que se esconden en las facultades de esta universidad y de otras.

Esta civilización con sus valores y principios que pasan por encima del individuo, con sus trabajos y sus estudios, con sus leyes y sus creencias religiosas, con sus monótonas reglas y su hipocresía, nos ha querido arrancar nuestros instintos más salvajes (en este caso, haciendo que el asesinato sea catalogado como “malo”, siendo este, una consecuencia de una guerra sin moral), pero no lo han logrado y la prueba está en el “homicidio doloso” que hemos ejecutado sin problema alguno.

A cuidarse mejor, estudiantes, docentes, investigadores de la UNAM y otras universidades, que no dudaremos en atacar mortalmente de nuevo…

Continuando con el “Funeral Nihilista” comenzado por “Individualidades tendiendo a lo salvaje” (Its) en 2011, cuando asesinaron de un balazo al biotecnólogo Ernesto Méndez Salinas en Cuernavaca, continuando con la aniquilación de la vida perpetrada por el “Grupúsculo Indiscriminado” en Marzo de este año cuando asesinaron a un estudiante de informática del IPN en Iztacalco.

Que el Eco-extremismo y el Terrorismo Nihilista sigan creciendo en México, Chile, Argentina, Italia y otros lugares.

¡Con la Naturaleza Salvaje de nuestro lado!

Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje-Ciudad de México

-Mafia Eco-extremista/Nihilista


(MESSICO) DECIMO COMUNICATO DEGLI INDIVIDUALISTI TENDENTI AL SELVAGGIO-MAFIA ECO-ESTREMISTA/NICHILISTA: RIVENDICAZIONE DELL’ASSASSINIO DI UN LAVORATORE DELL’UNAM

Avanziamo, per cacciare. Ieri notte ci siamo trasformati in lupi, la nostra sete di sangue si è saziata per alcuni momenti, mentre i demoni dei nostri antenati si impadronivano delle nostre menti e dei nostri corpi.

Ci aggiriamo furtivamente nella Città Universitaria, una delle culle del progresso umano, un posto, dove le presuntuose menti professionali propongono la vile finalità di costruire un “domani migliore”, quel “migliore domani” che minaccia la distruzione della Terra, la scomparsa degli istinti dell’individuo e l’addomesticamento delle specie.

Noi NON crediamo in un “domani migliore”, non siamo “rivoluzionari” né ci identifichiamo con queste ideologie riciclate, siamo Individualisti-Terroristi con Obiettivo Egoici, politicamente Scorretti, Amorali e Indiscriminati.

Il “Gruppo Occulto Furia di Lince” delle ITS, e il gruppo “Guerra Eco-Estremista Guamera”avevano già Attentato, (il 25 e l’8 di Aprile di quest’anno rispettivamente), nella Città Universitaria. Le autorità avevano nascosto questi attacchi. Ora non possono nascondere questo…

Ieri abbiamo pugnalato il capo dei servizi della Facoltà di Chimica dell’UNAM, il nostro coltello ha perforato la sua carne, i muscoli e le vene, dissanguandolo e lasciandolo senza vita. È per noi un dispiacere non aver potuto strappargli il cuoio capelluto come vittoria, come lo facevano i nostri antenati in guerra, sarà per la prossima volta..

L’avevamo già affermato, e non scherzavamo, nel nostro primo comunicato nel gennaio di quest’anno “i feriti e morti che causiamo sono un’offerta di sangue per la Natura Selvaggia”. Abbiamo ammazzato quest’uomo per dimostrare che non abbiamo rispetto per la vita degli iper-civilizzati universitari né di nessun altro, e DISPREZZIAMO la loro routine, le norme e la loro morale, RESPINGIAMO l’uguaglianza, il progresso umano, la tolleranza, la scienza, il collettivismo, il cristianesimo, il pacifismo, la modernità e altre cagate che odorano di addomesticamento civilizzato.

Nessuno e nessuna persona dentro questa putrida civiltà merita considerazione, e meno i pestilenziali progressisti e umanisti che si nascondono nelle facoltà in questa e altre università.

La civilizzazione con i suoi valori e principi passa sopra l’individuo, con i lavori e i suoi studi, con le leggi e le credenze religiose, con le sue monotone regole e l’ipocrisia, volendoci strappare ai nostri istinti più selvaggi (in questo caso, facendo percepire che l’assassinio è catalogato come “brutto”, poiché questa è la conseguenza di una guerra senza morale), ma non ci riescono e la prova sta nell’”omicidio delittuoso” che abbiamo eseguito senza problema alcuno.

Riguardatevi, lo diciamo a voi, studenti, docenti, investigatori dell’UNAM e delle altre università. Non abbiamo nessun problema nell’attentare mortalmente di nuovo.

Il “Funerale Nichilista” avanza. Nato dalle “Individualità tendendo al selvaggio” (Its) che nel 2011 assassinarono con un colpo al cervello il biotecnologo Ernesto Méndez Salinas a Cuernavaca, e che è proseguito con l’annichilimento e l’assassinio di uno studente di Informatica dell’IPN in Iztacalco, perpetrato dal “Grupúsculo Indiscriminato”, nel Marzo di quest’anno.

Che l’Eco-Estremismo e il Terrorismo Nichilista avanzi nel crescere in Messico, Cile, Argentina, Italia e altri posti.

Con la Natura Selvaggia al nostro fianco!

Individualisti Tendenti al Selvaggio- Città del Messico

-Mafia Eco-Estremista/Nichilista


(MEXICO) ACCEPTING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ASSASSINATION OF AN UNAM WORKER: TENTH COMMUNIQUÉ OF THE INDIVIDUALISTS TENDING TOWARD THE WILD

We were on the hunt, and last night we turned into wolves. Our thirst for blood was satisfied for a moment, while the demons of our ancestors took possession of our minds and bodies.

We lurked about the University City, one of the cradles of human progress. This is a place that forms smug professional minds who are devoted to the disgusting purpose of “building a better tomorrow.” This “better tomorrow” is stained by the destruction of the Earth, by the destruction of the instincts of the individual and by the domestication of the species.

We don’t believe in a “better tomorrow”. We aren’t “revolutionaries” nor do we identify with their recycled ideologies. We are individualist-terrorists with egoist purpose. We are politically incorrect, immoral, and indiscriminate.

The University City is the place where most recently the “Fury of the Lynx Clandestine Group” and the “Guamera Eco-Extremist Group” have attacked (April 25th and April 8th, respectively). The authorities silenced these attacks and pretended they didn’t happen. Well, you’re not going to be able to keep this one quiet.

Yesterday we stabbed the Chief of Chemical Services in the Department of Chemistry at the UNAM. Our knife pierced his flesh, his muscles, and veins, bleeding him and leaving him for dead. It’s a pity we couldn’t scalp him (as was the practice of our ancestors in war), but that’ll be for next time…

6cuph01_32878899

We already said in our first communiqué in January of this year that, “the wounded and dead that we inflict will be as a blood offering to Wild Nature,” and we weren’t joking. We executed this man to show that we don’t have any respect for the lives of the hyper-civilized of the university or anywhere else. We despise their routines, their norms and morality. We reject equality, human progress, tolerance, science, collectivism, Christianity, pacifism, modernity, and all of the other shit that reeks of civilized domestication.

No one within this putrid civilization deserves any consideration, least of all the disgusting progressivists and humanists who hide behind the walls of this and other universities.

This civilization wants to eliminate our most wild instincts to impose on us its values that run roughshod over the individual; its work and study; its law and religious beliefs; and its monotonous rules and hypocrisy. In this case, it wants us to consider this murder “evil”, even though it is a result of a war without morality. But they haven’t succeeded, and the proof is in this “painful homicide” that we were able to pull off without a hitch.

Be more careful, students, instructors, and researchers of the UNAM and other universities, since we won’t hesitate to mortally attack again.In continuity with the “Nihilist Funeral” started by the Individualities Tending Toward the Wild (ITS) in 2011, when they shot dead the biotechnologist Ernesto Mendez Salinas in Cuernavaca; and in continuity with the annihilation of the life of a computer science student of the IPN carried out by the Indiscriminate Faction in Iztacalco in March of this year.

May Eco-extremism and Terrorist Nihilism increase in Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Italy, and other places.

With Wild Nature on our side!

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild – Mexico City

Eco-Extremist / Nihilist Mafia


(México) Reivindicação do Assassinato de um Trabalhador da UNAM: Décimo Comunicado de Individualistas Tendendo ao Selvagem (ITS)

Andamos à caça, na noite de ontem nos convertemos em lobos, nossa sede de sangue se saciou por uns momentos, enquanto os demônios de nossos antepassados se apoderavam de nossas mentes e nossos corpos.

Perambulamos pela Cidade Universitária, um dos berços do progresso humano, lugar onde se forjam as presunçosas mentes profissionais que propuseram a desprezível finalidade de construir um “amanhã melhor”, esse “amanhã melhor” que está manchado pela destruição da Terra, pela desaparição dos instintos do indivíduo e pela domesticação das espécies.

Nós NÃO acreditamos em um “amanhã melhor”, não somos “revolucionários” nem nos identificamos com suas ideologias recicladas, somos individualistas terroristas com objetivos egoicos, politicamente incorretos, amorais e indiscriminados.

Cidade Universitária, lugar onde ultimamente o “Grupo Oculto Fúria de Lince” do ITS, e o grupo “Guerra Eco-extremista Guamera” haviam atentado, (em 25 e 8 de abril deste ano respectivamente), e que as autoridades silenciaram seus ataques. Agora não serão capazes de silenciar isto…

Apunhalamos ontem o chefe de serviços químicos da Faculdade de Química da UNAM, nossa faca perfurou sua carne, músculos e veias, fazendo ele sangrar até a morte e o deixando sem vida. É uma pena que não pudemos arrancar o coro cabeludo como vitória (assim como faziam nossos antepassados em guerra), fica para a próxima…

Já havíamos dito em nosso primeiro comunicado em janeiro deste ano, “os feridos e mortos que causaremos serão uma oferenda de sangue para a Natureza Selvagem”, e não estamos de brincadeira. Executamos este homem para demonstrar que NÃO sentimos respeito pela vida dos hiper-civilizados universitários nem de nenhum outro, que DESPREZAMOS suas rotinas, suas normas e sua moral, que RECHAÇAMOS a igualdade, o progresso humano, a tolerância, a ciência, o coletivismo, o cristianismo, o pacifismo, a modernidade e outros dejetos que cheiram à domesticação civilizada.

Ninguém, nenhuma pessoa dentro desta pútrida civilização merece consideração, e muito menos os fedidos progressistas e humanistas que se escondem nas faculdades desta universidade e de outras.

Esta civilização com seus valores e princípios que passam por cima do indivíduo, com seus trabalhos e seus estudos, com suas leis e suas crenças religiosas, com suas monótonas regras e sua hipocrisia, quer arrancar nossos instintos mais selvagens (neste caso, fazendo com que o assassinato seja marcado como “mau”, sendo este, uma consequência de uma guerra sem moral), mas fracassaram e a prova está no “homicídio doloso” que cometemos sem problema algum.

Tenham mais cuidado estudantes, docentes, investigadores da UNAM e outras universidades, que não exitaremos em atacar mortalmente de novo…

Continuando com o “Funeral Niilista” começado por “Individualidades Tendendo ao Selvagem” (its) em 2011, quando assassinaram com um tiro o biotecnólogo Ernesto Méndez Salinas em Cuernavaca, continuando com a aniquilação da vida perpetrada pelo “Grupúsculo Indiscriminado” em Março deste ano quando assassinaram a um estudante de informática do IPN em Iztacalco.

Que o Eco-extremismo e o Terrorismo Niilista sigam crescendo no México, Chile, Argentina, Itália e outros lugares.

Com a Natureza Selvagem do nosso lado!

 Individualistas Tendendo ao Selvagem – Cidade do México

– Máfia Eco-extremista/Niilista


Meksika: Bir UNAM Çalışanı Suikastinin Sorumululuğunun Üstlenilmesi: Yabana Meyleden Bireyciler’in Onuncu Bildirisi

Biz avdaydık, ve dün gece kurda dönüştük. Atalarımızın şeytani zihinleri ve bedenlerinin sahipliğini alarak, kan için susuzluğumuz bir an için memnun oldu.

Biz insanlığın ilerlemesinin beşiği olan, Üniversite Şehri etrafında pusudaydık.  Bu “daha iyi bir yarın inşa” amacıyla adamış olan kendini beğenmiş profesyonel zihinleri oluşturan bir yerdir. Bu “daha iyi bir yarın” bireyin içgüdülerinin yıkımından ve türlerin evcilleştirilmesinden, Yeryüzünün yıkımına dek lekelidir.

Biz “daha iyi bir yarına” inanmıyoruz. Biz ne “devrimciler”‘iz ne de onların geri dönüşümlü ideolojilerini tespit edeceğiz. Biz egoist amaç ile bireyci-teröristiz. Biz politika olarak yanlış, ahlaksız ve gelişigüzeliz.

Üniversite Şehri en son “Vaşak Gizli’nin Öfkesi Grubu” ve  “Guamera Eko-Aşırı Grubu”nun saldırdığı yerdir. Yetkililer bu saldırıları susturdu ve olmamış gibi davrandı.  Eh, bu sessizliği devam ettirecek değiliz.

Dün UNAM Kimya Anabilim Dalı Kimya Hizmetleri Şefini bıçakladık. Bıçağımız onun vücudunu, kaslarını ve damarlarını parçalar, kanlar içinde ve ölü bırakır. Onun kafa derisini(savaşta atalarımızın uyguladığı gibi) yüzmememiz üzücü, fakat bir dahaki sefere olacak…

Zaten “Vahşi Doğaya bir kan adağı olarak sunacağımız yaralama ve ölüyü”, ve şaka yapmadığımızı, bu yılın Ocak ayındaki ilk bildiride söyledik. Üniversite ya da başka bir yerin aşırı-uygar yaşamlarında herhangi bir saygının olmadığını göstermek için bu adamı infaz ettik. Onların rutinlerini, normlarını ve ahlaklarını küçümsüyoruz. Biz eşitliği, insan ilermesini, hoşgörüyü, bilimi, kolektivizmi, dini, pasifizmi, moderni ve uygar evcilleşmenin kokan diğer tüm pisliklerini reddederiz.

Bu kokuşmuş medeniyet içindeki kimse bu ve diğer üniversite duvarları arkasına gizlenen tüm iğrenç ilericiler ve humanistler en azından, hiçbir saygıyı hak etmiyor.

Bu uygarlık bizi birey üzerinde; onların çalışma ve eğitim; hukuk ve dini inançlar; ve monoton kuralları ve ikiyüzlülüğünü kayarlı çalışan kendi değerlerini empoze etmek için en vahşi içgüdülerimizi ortadan kaldırmak istiyor. Bu durumda, ahlak olmaksızın bir savaşın sonucu olmasına rağmen, bu cinayeti “kötü” kabul etmemizi istiyor. Fakat başarılı olamadık, ve kanıt biz sorunsuzca geri çekilmeyi başararak “acı cinayet” oldu.

Öğrenciler, öğretim elemanları ve UNAM ve diğer üniversitelerin araçtırma görevlileri daha dikkatli olun, çünkü biz ölümcül bir saldırı için bir an bile tereddüt etmeyeceğiz. Cuernavaca’da biyoteknolojik Ernesto Mendez Salinas’ı vurmasından, 2011’de Yabana Meyleden Bireyler(ITS) tarafından başlatılan “Nihilist Cenaze” ile süreklilik; ve bu yılın Mart ayında Iztacalco’nun Gelişigüzel Fraksiyon tarafından yürütülen IPN’nin bir bilgisayar öğrencisinin yaşamını yok etme ile devamlılık içinde.

Eko-aşırılık ve terörist nihilizm Meksika, Şili, Arjantin, İtalya ve diğer yerlerde büyümeye devam ediyor. 

Vahşi Doğa ile bizim tarafımızda!

Yabana Meyleden Bireyciler – Meksika Şehri

-Eko-Aşırı / Nihilist Mafya


ZODPOVĚDNOST ZA POPRAVU ZAMĚSTNANCE UNAM/DESÁTÉ KOMUNIKÉ INDIVIDUALISTŮ INKLINUJÍCÍCH K DIVOKOSTI (ITS)

Byli jsme na lovu,minulou noc jsme se proměnili ve vlky. Naše žízeň po krvi byla na okamžik ukojena, zatímco démoni našich předků obsadili naše duše a těla.

Číhali jsme kolem Univerzitního Města, jednoho z kolébek lidského pokroku. Místo, které tvoří samolibé profesionální mínění a které se věnuje nechutnému účelu “budování lepších zítřků.” Tyto “lepší zítřky” jsou potřísněny zničením Země, zničením instinktů jednotlivce a domestikací druhů.

Nevěříme v “lepší zítřky”. Nejsme “revolucionáři” ani se neztotožňujeme s jejich recyklovanými ideologiemi. Jsme individualističtí teroristé s egoistickými záměry. Politicky nekorektní, amorální, a bezohlední.

Univerzitní Město je místo, které v poslední době napadli “Utajená Grupa Běsnícího Rysa” a “Guamera Eko-Extremistická Grupa”(25 dubna a 8. dubna v uvedeném pořadí). Orgány umlčeli tyto útoky a předstírali, že se nic nestalo. No,tohle nebudete schopni umlčet.

Včera jsme pobodali Vedoucího Chemické Služby na Katedře Chemie UNAM. Náš nůž probodl jeho tělo, jeho svaly a žíly a krvácejícího ho nechal zemřít. Je škoda, že jsme ho nemohli skalpovat (jak tomu bylo ve válečné praxi našich předků), ale to nechme pro příště…

Jak už jsme řekli v našem prvním komuniké v lednu tohoto roku, že “postižení zraněním nebo mrtví poslouží jako krvavá oběť Divoké Přírody” nedělali jsme si srandu. Popravením tohoto muže jsme ukázali že nemáme žádnou úctu k životům na hyper-civilizované univerzitě nebo kdekoli jinde. Pohrdáme jejich rutinou,normami a morálku. Odmítáme rovnost, lidský pokrok, toleranci, vědu, kolektivismus, křesťanství, pacifismus, modernost a všechny ostatní sračky, které zavání civilizovanou domestikací.

Nikdo v této prohnilé civilizaci si nezaslouží žádný ohled,nejméně všichni odporní progresivisté a humanisté, kteří se skrývají za zdmi této i jiné z vysokých škol.

Tato civilizace chce zcela odstranit naše divoké instinkty a vnutit nám své hodnoty, které svojí tyranií staví nad jednotlivce,svou práci a studium, své zákony a náboženské přesvědčení a svá monotónní pravidla a pokrytectví. V tomto případě chce abychom tuto vraždu vnímali jako “zlo”, přestože je to výsledek války bez morálky. Ale bez úspěchu,důkazem je toto “bolestivé zabití”, které jsme byli schopni bez problémů provést.

Buďte více opatrní, studenti, učitelé a vědci z UNAM a jiných vysokých škol, protože nebudeme váhat smrtelně zaútočit znovu. V souvislosti s “Nihilistickým Pohřbem” započatým ze strany Individualistů Inklinujících k Divokosti (ITS) v roce 2011, kdy byl zastřelen biotechnolog Ernesto Mendez Salinas ve městě Cuernavaca a v návaznosti na ukončení života studenta počítačové vědy IPN Bezohlednou Frakcí v Iztacalco v březnu tohoto roku.

Nechť Eko-extremismus a Teroristický Nihilismus vzrůstá v Mexiku, Chile, Argentině, Itálii, a ostatních místech.

S Divokou Přírodou na naší straně!

Individualisté Inklinující k Divokosti – Mexiko

Eko-Extremistická / Nihilistická Mafie

Anhangá quem fala com DPR.

Asesinan a trabajador de la Facultad de Química de la UNAM

Desde la prensa mexicana:

José Jaime Moreno Barrera, jefe de servicios químicos de la Facultad de Química de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), fue asesinado la noche de ayer dentro de Ciudad Universitaria.

Reportes de la investigación señalan que alrededor de las 19:50 horas, la víctima de 50 años de edad fue atacada con un cuchillo bajo un puente de la Facultad.

Moreno Barrera fue apuñalado en el lado izquierdo del pecho, lo que le causó la muerte. El cuerpo fue hallado por personal de seguridad de la UNAM.

Al respecto, Teresa Santos, apoderada legal de la UNAM, indicó que no existen cámaras en el lugar del crimen, pero que entregarán los videos de algunas cercanas.

Hasta el momento, se desconoce el móvil del homicidio.

http://www.24-horas.mx/pgj-cdmx-investiga-asesinato-de-trabajador-de-la-unam-en-cu/

(es-en-it) Noveno comunicado de Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje-Chile

Comunicado publicado el 22 de junio 2016.

Imagenes acá:

https://mega.nz/#!pk8UlTpB!tVANbcThPxekw_ElOsBRVMv0HNKILwINsYOzjiQK2Ig

Comunicado del grupo “Sureños Incivilizados”, grupo de ITS en Chile reivindicando incendio que afectó el Mall Vivo del Cento de Santiago el 24 de mayo pasado, acto que llamó la atención de la prensa:

http://www.t13.cl/noticia/nacional/bomberos-trabaja-incendio-mall-del-centro

Fotos aca:

https://mega.nz/#!pk8UlTpB!tVANbcThPxekw_ElOsBRVMv0HNKILwINsYOzjiQK2Ig

¡Por la conspiración internacional contra la civilización!

¡Adelante con la guerra grupos eco-extremistas y terroristas nihilistas!


La masa hiper-civilizada junto a sus estructuras de vida social se merecen el fuego y los explosivos. No estamos ni a un paso con el clasismo hediondo y  escupimos en las precauciones humanistas de algunos para con la ciudadanía. Esa misma que no dudará un instante en hacerle la pega a la policía (véase las “detenciones ciudadanas”), por supuesto recibirán nuestro Fuego incivilizado.

Somos individuos desideologizados, por ende  orinamos en todas las ideologías. Nuestras motivaciones para el ataque son los Ríos, los Volcanes, el Océano, los Bosques, el Puma, la Loica y todo lo Salvaje.

Hemos como grupúsculo, constatado en los hechos que con mínimos recursos es posible el atentar contra la civilización. Llevando a ella el Caos, la desestabilización y porque no, el Terror.

Despreciamos la vida civilizada, sus ritos y procesos, sus valores y su progreso, por consecuente sus lugares de “esparcimiento” son y serán un blanco para los Eco-extremistas. Los centros comerciales, cines, clubes, restaurantes, etc., son la civilización misma por eso son objetivo.

Es por eso y mucho mas, que atentamos y nos hacemos completamente responsables del incendio que afectó a los patios de comida y la azotea del Mall del centro en plena capital, el pasado 24 de mayo. Para todos hasta ahora el siniestro era un accidente mas, ¡PUES YA NO!

Sepan que se trató de un  incendio intencional, Egoísta y Salvaje. Con  estas palabras declaramos que los autores de este atentado fuimos nosotros, Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje (ITS). Los que una vez mas nos desenvolvimos a gusto por su asquerosa cuidad, al acecho como el Puma Patagónico.

La mochila esconde el material, rodeados de ciudadanos descendemos de la micro para plantar paso firme hacia el lugar elegido, es en estos instantes cuando tu corazón le dice a tu mente que no hay vuelta atrás, sin dudar por un instante del camino escogido. En cada paso vamos con los espíritus de los aborígenes del pasado, con las estrellas y el viento. Llegamos y solo resta dirigirse al lugar acordado, nuestro “disfraz” nos da la capacidad de llegar donde otros no pueden, con el corazón a mil y las manos temblorosas nos disponemos a abandonar la carga incendiaria escondida experimentalmente dentro de una caja de leche. La huida es el doble de tensa, pero una vez afuera reímos de placer (y no en silencio), nos miran con caras de, ¿y estos qué? Y desaparecemos……….

Escondidos y lejos, hoy a casi un mes ¡es el momento nuestro!

Por las heladas tierras Sureñas todavía quedamos unos cuantos que nos resistimos a todo lo artificial. Resistencia que no es pasiva, sino violenta y Salvaje. Resistencia que no teme a las consecuencias de los actos, dando cara al tecno-sistema. Nuestro Fuego-Terror proviene desde nuestros más primitivos instintos, esos que la artificialidad no ha podido erradicar de nosotros.

¡Saludos cómplices a todos los ITS en el Norte, a los eco-extremistas de todos lados, a la Secta italiana y a la Horda Mística del Bosque!

¡Sepan que acá andamos en guerra!

Individualistas Tendiendo a lo Salvaje-Chile

-Sureños incivilizados


(CHILE) NINTH COMMUNIQUÉ OF THE INDIVIDUALISTS TENDING TOWARD THE WILD

The hyper-civilized along with their structures of social life deserve fire and explosives. We are not sympathetic at all with disgusting “class struggle” and we spit on humanist precautions of some for the common citizenry. Those masses would not hesitate to snitch to the police (refer to the “citizen’s arrest”), so that’s why they will only get Uncivilized Fire.

We are un-ideological individuals. We thus piss on all ideologies. Our motivations for attack are the Rivers, Volcanoes, the Ocean, the Forests, the Puma, the Meadowlark, and all that is Wild.

We have shown as a faction that attack against civilization is possible with minimum resources. We have brought to it Chaos, destabilization, and why not, Terror.

We detest civilized life, its rights and processes, its values and progress. Thus, its recreational areas are and will be targets for eco-extremists. Malls, movie theaters, clubs, restaurants, etc. are civilization itself and thus are targets.

It’s for that reason and many more that we attacked and take responsibility for the fire in the food court and rooftop of the Mall in the center of the capital this past May 24th. For all until now the act was an accident. Well, not anymore!

Let it be known that this was arson, an Egoist and Savage Fire. With these words we, the Individualists Tending Toward the Wild, declare that we were the authors of this attack; we who again lurked about your disgusting city like a content Patagonian Puma.

The backpack hid the material and, surrounded by citizens, we got off the bus and headed to the chosen spot. In those moments, your heart tells your mind that there’s no turning back, that you have no doubts on this chosen path. With each step we walked with the spirits of the native peoples of the past, with the stars and the wind. We got there and it was only a matter of getting to the agreed upon place. Our “disguise” gave us the capability of getting into places where others can’t. With our hearts racing and our hands trembling we abandoned our explosive device hidden experimentally within a carton of milk. The escape was doubly tense, but once outside we laughed with pleasure (and not silently). People looked at us like, “What’s wrong with these guys?” And we disappeared….

In hiding and far away, today almost a month later, this is our moment!

In the frozen Southern lands, we remain among those who resist all that is artificial. This resistance is not passive, but violent and Wild. It does not fear the consequences of these acts, facing off against the techno-system. Our Fiery Terror comes from our most primitive instincts, those which artificiality has not been able to eradicate within us.

Accomplice greetings to ITS in the North, to eco-extremists everywhere, to the Italian Sect and the Mystical Horde of the Forest!

Let it be known that there is War in the South!

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild – Chile

– Uncivilized Southerners


(CILE) NONO COMUNICATO DEGLI INDIVIDUALISTI TENDENTI AL SELVAGGIO-INCIVILIZZATI DEL SUD

La massa iper-civilizzata che aderisce alle strutture della vita sociale merita il fuoco e gli esplosivi. Non siamo per nulla vicini al classismo fetido e sputiamo sulle precauzioni umaniste di alcuni verso la massa cittadina. La stessa massa non ha remore nell’infamarci alla polizia in un istante (vedere le “detenzioni cittadine”). Ovviamente riceverà il nostro Fuoco incivilizzato.

Siamo individui anti ideologici, quindi pisciamo su tutte le ideologie. Le nostre motivazioni per l’attacco sono i Fiumi, i Vulcani, l’oceano, i Boschi, il Puma, le allodole e tutto il Selvaggio.

Come grupúsculo, abbiamo costatato nei fatti che è possibile con minime risorse Attentare alla civilizzazione. Portando il Caos, la destabilizzazione e perché no, il Terrore.

Disprezziamo la vita civilizzata, i suoi riti e processi, i suoi valori e il suo progresso, e di conseguenza i suoi luoghi di “diffusione” sono e saranno un bersaglio per gli Eco-Estremisti. I centri commerciali, cinema, club, ristoranti, etc., sono la civiltà e per questo motivo sono obiettivi.

È per questo motivo che rivendichiamo l’Attentato e la responsabilità dell’incendio che ha colpito i ristoranti e la terrazza del Mall nel centro della capitale, il 24 maggio. Per tutti è stato un incidente, ORAMAI NON PIÙ!

Sappiate che si è trattato di un incendio intenzionale, Egoista e Selvaggio. Con queste parole affermiamo che gli autori di quest’attentato siamo noi, gli Individualisti Tendendo Selvaggio (ITS). Ci districhiamo con gusto nelle schifose città, come il Puma patagonico in agguato.

Lo zaino nasconde il materiale e circondati dalla moltitudine, discendiamo dal micro per dirigerci, con passo fermo verso l’obiettivo. È in questi istanti che il cuore dice alla mente che non si torna indietro, senza dubitare per un istante nella strada scelta. Ogni passo fatto è compiuto con gli spiriti degli aborigeni del passato, con le stelle e il vento. Arriviamo, resta solo da dirigersi verso il posto. Il nostro “travestimento” ci dà la capacità di arrivare dove altri non possono, col cuore a mille e le mani che tremano, ci disponiamo per “consegnare” la carica incendiaria, nascosta sperimentalmente dentro una scatola di latte. La fuga è di un intensità ancora maggiore, ma una volta fuori ridiamo di piacere (e non in silenzio). I passanti ci guardano con delle facce come dire, e questi che? E spariamo…

Nascosti e lontani, oggi a quasi un mese è il nostro momento!
Dalle gelate terre del sud rimangono ancora pochi che resistono all’artificiale. Resistenza che non è passiva, bensì violenta e Selvaggia. Resistenza che non teme le conseguenze degli atti, per rompere il culo al tecno-sistema. Il nostro Fuoco- Terrore proviene dai nostri più primitivi istinti, quelli che l’artificialità non ha potuto sradicare.

Saluti complici a tutte le ITS del Nord, gli Eco-Estremisti da ogni dove, la Setta italiana e l’Orda Mistica del Bosco!
Sappiano che stiamo avanziando in guerra!

Individualisti Tendendo al Selvaggio- Cile

-Incivilizzati del sud

(es-en-it) OCTAVO COMUNICADO DE INDIVIDUALISTAS TENDIENDO A LO SALVAJE-ARGENTINA

Comunicado publicado el 19 de junio 2016.

Imagenes acá: https://mega.nz/#!pk8UlTpB!tVANbcThPxekw_ElOsBRVMv0HNKILwINsYOzjiQK2Ig

Comunicado de ITS-Argentina reivindicando diferentes amenazas de bomba en varias escuelas y universidades, y un explosivo contra el presidente de subtes.

¡Con la Naturaleza Salvaje del lado de los eco-extremistas!

¡Adelante con la conspiración internacional contra la civilización y el progreso humano!


“Es mejor tener la boca cerrada y parecer estúpido que abrirla y disipar la duda”

M.

A los indudablemente estúpidos…

Mediante este breve mensaje ITS se hace responsable de:

– Las reiteradas amenazas de bombas realizadas a escuelas porteñas que generó denuncias, un “abrazo a la escuela” (?) y hasta una página en la red social Facebook. “Esta página la hemos creado para que se pare con las reiteradas amenazas de bombas que sufre nuestro querido establecimiento” (1)

– La amenaza de bomba realizada a la Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. (2)

– La amenaza de bomba en la estación Diagonal Norte de la línea C del Subte realizada el pasado 15/6. (3)

A la prensa le decimos: La amenaza de bomba en Diagonal Norte fue estratégicamente pensada y realizada, sabíamos del paro en la línea B y de los conflictos gremiales con las otras líneas, además de ser una estación donde se realizan combinaciones y por ende provocaría como efecto dominó retrasos en las otras líneas. Pero que quede claro que solo fue una mera estrategia, no nos interesan los conflictos sindicales, las luchas obreras, ni el despido de tal o cual trabajador. ITS puede ser un animal carroñero, ténganlo en cuenta…

La amenaza de bomba en Diagonal Norte fue un aviso y lo saben bien, luego que habilitaran nuevamente el servicio les enviamos un mensaje bien claro que al parecer no tuvieron en cuenta por eso el sábado por la tarde fuimos hasta allí, nos hicimos presentes y abandonamos un artefacto explosivo dirigido al presidente de subtes Juan Pablo Piccardo que lamentablemente no explotó, será la próxima.

Nuestras amenazas son el rayo que anuncia la tormenta, amenazamos al subte y luego fuimos por su presidente, mañana quién sabe…

Individualistas tendiendo a lo salvaje – Argentina

Constelaciones salvajes

 

Notas:

(1) http://larazon.com.ar/ciudad/Reiteradas-amenazas-bomba-escuelas-porteno_0_786000072.html 

http://telefenoticias.com.ar/actualidad/la-comunidad-educativa-se-une-en-un-abrazo-al-normal-1/

https://www.facebook.com/No-a-las-amenazas-de-bombas-del-Normal-n1-126057641134301/

(2) http://www.radiofmq.com/detalle.php?tipo=1&documento=71046&sistema=fmq

http://www.quilmespresente.com/quilmes/amenaza-de-bomba-en-la-unq-143526

(3) www.minutouno.com/notas/1492680-subte-falsa-amenaza-bomba-paralizo-el-servicio-la-linea-c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_VFVzCFn3g


(Argentina) Eighth Communiqué of the Individualists Tending Toward the Wild

“It’s better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt.”

M.

To the undoubtedly stupid:

By this brief message ITS claims responsibility for:

-The repeated bomb threats on schools in Buenos Aires which have generated denunciations, “a hug for the school” (?), and even a page on Facebook. “We’ve made this page in order to stop the repeated bomb threats that our beloved establishment has suffered”. (1)

– The bomb threat against National Quilmes University. (2)

– The bomb threat against the Northern Diagonal C line of the Buenos Aires subway made this past June 15th. (3)

To the press we say: The bomb threat on the Northern Diagonal was strategically planned and carried out. We knew of the strike on the B line and of the union conflicts on other lines. Also we know that it is a station where transfers are made and thus a threat would cause delays on other lines. But let it be clear that this was a mere strategic move. We aren’t interested in union conflicts, working class struggle, nor the firing of any given worker. ITS can also be a scavenger animal, take that into account…

The bomb threat against the Northern Diagonal was a warning and they know it well. When they got everything running normally again we decided to follow up as they didn’t seem to get the message the first time. Thus, on Saturday evening we went over there and left an explosive device directed to the President of the Buenos Aires Subway, Juan Pablo Piccardo, which unfortunately didn’t explode. That will be for next time.

Our threats are the lightening strike that announces the storm. We threatened the subway and then we went for its president. Tomorrow, who knows…

Individualists Tending Toward the Wild – Argentina

Wild Constellations


OTTAVO COMUNICATO DEGLI INDIVIDUALISTI TENDENTI AL SELVAGGIO-CONSTELLAZIONI SELVAGGIE

“È meglio avere la bocca chiusa e sembrare stupido che aprirla e dissipare il dubbio”.

M.

Agli innegabili stupidi…

Mediante questo breve messaggio le ITS rivendicano:

-Allarmi bomba reiterati e realizzati nelle scuole elementari che hanno generato delle denunce, un “abbraccio” alla scuola (?) e per fino una pagina nella rete sociale di Facebook. “Questa pagina l’abbiamo creata affinché si fermino gli allarmi bomba reiterati che la nostra amata scuola sta sopportando “. (1)

-L’allarme bomba compiuto all’università nazionale di Quilmes. (2)

-L’allarme bomba nella stazione Diagonale Nord della linea C della metropolitana realizzato il 15/6. (3)

Alla stampa diciamo: L’allarme bomba nella stazione Diagonale Nord fu pensato e realizzato strategicamente, sapevamo della mancanza di lavoro nella linea B e dei conflitti corporativi con le altre linee, oltre ad essere una stazione dove si realizzano scambi e che avrebbe potuto provocare un effetto dominò e ritardi nelle altre linee. Che rimanga chiaro che fu solo per mera strategia, non c’interessano i conflitti sindacali, le lotte operaie, né il licenziamento di tale o quale lavoratore. ITS può essere un animale necrofago, tenetelo in conto.

L’allarme bomba nella stazione Diagonale Nord era un avviso e loro lo sanno bene, dato che dopo hanno abilitato nuovamente il servizio. Il messaggio inviato indubbiamente non è stato tenuto in conto poiché il sabato sera eravamo la, eravamo presenti e abbiamo abbandonato un artefatto esplosivo diretto al presidente della metropolitana Juan Pablo Piccardo, che avversità, non è esploso. Sarà per la prossima volta.

Le nostre minacce sono il lampo che annuncia la tempesta, minacciamo la metropolitana, dopo sarà per il presidente, e domani chi sa..

Individualisti tendendo al selvaggio- Argentina

Costellazioni selvagge

OUR RESPONSE IS LIKE AN EARTHQUAKE: IT COMES SOONER OR LATER

*Trabajo PDF con este texto en inglés, español e italiano:

https://mega.nz/#!F11XzLiI!PJ00zI-u9kkMp0TInQm9kXhTcF_S_SL6BfrQU5F1_Bc


Preliminary note: This text is written with a good dose of sarcasm and satire, reader discretion is advised.

Preliminary note 2: This text is not to be interpreted as the standard “invitation to dialogue” nor is it an “intervention to work out ideas,” as some have characterized our destructive criticisms. This is just straight trolling from those who administer this blog and meant to be offensive to those who talk shit.

Preliminary note 3: See Preliminary note 1

Since the inception of eco-extremist actions and interventions, there has been a steady and unending flow of criticisms from various schools of thought. It should be pointed out that few of these have the intention of being constructive. The majority are just plain shit-talking, criticizing for criticism’s sake, or straight defamation. Here we are going to try to answer and refute them. We say “try” because it would seem for our haters that eco-extremist texts are written in a special hieroglyphics, as it seems impossible for them to understand. Or maybe they’re just retarded, hard to say, but either way, let’s get started…

“Those who take aim at us the most are the ones who admire us the most.’“

T.

A) From the blog

As we’ve mentioned before, “Maldición Eco-extremista” is not a cute inoffensive blog. We are not a news site that avoids discussion and we don’t really want to keep putting up preliminary notes on any text that tries to describe our disagreements with a particular position. If the content of a particular text does not convince us usually we just ignore it.

We don’t publish criticisms, analysis, and claims of responsibility for actions that smell of radicalism with explanatory notes for good measure. That’s what most “counter-information” sites out there do, and it’s clear we aren’t one of them.

It should also be taken into consideration that eco-extremism means illegality. It’s pissing on legal and juridical statutes imposed by civilization. Since we follow this attitude we state it openly. Thus, in our preliminary notes we publicly root for individualists to satisfy their darkest instincts while leaping over barriers of what is “legal” or “permitted.”

Sure, these have logical consequences before the legal representatives. These are well-known and it would bore us to have to describe them again here. As we say, those are the consequences, reactions to our actions or the actions of others. Being the “public face” of eco-extremism carries with it certain responsibilities and one of these is to reply to all of the shit-talking against us. We would love to not have to deal with all of this stupidity and gossip, but as the title states: “Our response always comes, like an earthquake.”

B) Critics of México, Argentina, Chile y Gringolandia, UNITE!

For some time, a handful of criticisms have been published on different blogs, in magazines, etc. mostly of the anarchist persuasion. Most of these are incorrect interpretations or mere unfounded judgments of the words and deeds of the eco-extremists. These are texts that it would be worth the time to respond to rapidly, but to be honest when we first read them we had to laugh:

-(México) “Contra el eco-extremismo a la mecsicana” was written by Heliogeorgos Caro (HC), a self-styled intellectual in the Department of Political and Social Sciences at the UNAM who thinks that his intellectual formation makes him “slightly above average”. The eunuch HC, to refresh your memory, was owned several times by the criticism of Reacción Salvaje in the piece, “Ya nos habíamos tardado: Breves contemplaciones sobre los comentarios catedráticos de Heliogerogos Caro,” from March 18th, 2015.

It seems that “Hípster Cagón” [Shitty Hipster] wanted payback with his little essay, the rematch (LOL!) for all of the butthurt that RS inflicted on him and now he is searching desperately for a reply. Poor thing…

Of this criticism, we’ll not say much. Only that it’s totally off base. His premises are useless since they don’t have much to do with the essence of eco-extremism. It’s a criticism from a pseudo-mathematician who defends scientism at all costs. So there’s not much to see there, really.

-(Argentina)  Another staunch critic wrote an expose in the Argentine magazine, “Puñal Negro,”  [Black Dagger] that in its first issue had an article entitled, “Objetivos ¿amorales? del ataque”. These anarchists look up to us so much they even gave us their first essay in their magazine. Wow!

Those “black dagger” folks are an example, but don’t get excited, they’re an example of bad interpretation of eco-extremist writings. For one thing, they confuse “indiscriminate attack” with “random attack,’ which to be fair is a common mistake for the nuns of anarchism and brain dead folks like them.

It’s pretty obvious that the objectives that eco-extremists choose to hit are OBJECTIVE TARGETS and not random as those dagger folk would have it. Eco-extremists have at least had the guts to say that they do NOT regret the wounding of bystanders who find themselves in the middle of an attack. This is what is meant when we bring up “indiscriminate attack,” and, in fact, this is the ancient and venerable manner of waging war. To be sure the most primitive ancestors of the black dagger folks brutally killed and maimed members of other tribes indiscriminately during any given conflict. Only it seems like this brand of anarchist only accepts “modern” methods of attack: ones that are done with much care, going out of the way not to harm the random bystander. What garbage!

We know that our conditions aren’t the same as those of our ancestors, but the war practically is. It is the War against the Artificial within the eco-extremist perspective. So that’s why we exhort anarchists of this type to see more than what they want to see and look beyond their own noses. If they don’t want to, it’s better if they just shut up.

It’s an all-too-common hypocrisy in some radical circles, those which are always going on about the defense of “life,” “against domestication,” “against exploitation,” and other boring endless dreck. But when a passerby is wounded in one of their attacks, they either keep quiet about it or apologize. The first is cowardice, the second is a sign that, if you keep on carrying out actions like that, others might be similarly injured or even killed. So if you don’t want to die from all of those pangs of conscience, you might as well devote yourself to helping old ladies cross the street, or something similar.

When eco-extremists speak of “Indiscriminate Attacks,” they’re saying that they DON’T care if bystanders get hurt or killed during their attacks, as long as the target is hit. That is to say, they are out to hit a SPECIFIC target. That’s it.

This was also the case with Severino Di Giovani and his gang. Do you remember that from your Anarchist History class, Dagger dudes? No. Alright, let’s refresh your memory, boludooos:

May 7th, 1928: A powerful explosion destroyed a significant portion of the Italian Consulate in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The target was the General Consul of Italy, one Mr. Capani, one of the right hand men of Benito Mussolini. The two anarchists, Severino and Ramé, not being able to make it to Capani’s office, abandoned the suitcase with the bomb in it on the stairs of the diplomatic headquarters. The bomb exploded powerfully, leaving nine dead and 34 wounded. Seven of the dead were fascists, the other two dead and the majority of the wounded were BYSTANDERS. Because of this attack, Severino’s group would be labeled as a “gang of violent crazy men.” Today we don’t live in Severino’s time when he used terrorism to fight the fascism of his age. Today we fight the new face of fascism which is civilization and the domestication of those who celebrate it. The eco-extremists don’t hesitate to attack it.

We mention that this attack of Di Giovani is what we mean by “Indiscriminate Attack,” so that you idiot daggers can understand better where we are coming from. The Great Terrorist Di Giovani’s act was a good example of this. Compare this REAL anarchist with the fascist gangs, take into consideration the fierce and indiscriminate practices of the past. Do it and they will come back from the past to take your lives like they did that of the anarchist López Arango, who talked a lot of shit about Severino.

Then the “daggers” continue saying:  “what we carry out is what we do because we feel like it. It is not a call from any type of morality or a call of the sacred forest or any other mystical bullshit.”

We have thrown the bible of anarchism and its church in the trash a long time ago. Specifically, we have cast aside that slogan, “no gods, no master,” or “against any God.” For sure, we piss and shit on the Christian god and his religion. No doubt about that! Our belief is in Pagan animism.

Our paganism believes in the cycles of the Earth. Thus, we venerate and extol the Wild and Ineffable: the Mountain, the Rain, the Thunder, the Sun, the Wind, the Moon, the Rivers, the Condor, the Deer, etc. With the greatest pride we extol that which WE ARE and what we believe. We walk with our DEITIES at all times, as once our ancestors did. Just as the last wild tribes on Earth do, bound to their Gods and their mysteries.

The truth is that in every attack against civilization, eco-extremists act possessed by that spirit of what you call the Wild Forest. This call incites us to commit violent and radical acts against progress and civilization.

Eco-extremist Paganism is Accursed, its attacks will also be Accursed…

We hope with this that we have cleared up any doubts concerning the term, “Indiscriminate Attack.” And if we haven’t, that’s not our problem. It’s the result of your inferior intellectual abilities. Lastly, if our pride bothers you, or our paganism, or what we are or do, just stop reading eco-extremist communiqués and stop coming by our blog. Stop being our judge, jury, and executioner. Stop saying that you don’t want to argue even when you’re making an indirect argument. Either way, eco-extremists aren’t ones to lie down and keep quiet.

-(Argentina) The anarchist publication “De la propaganda a los hechos” (May 2016).

It would seem that the anarchist who wrote the essay, “On ITS” has understood the concept of “Indiscriminate Attack” better than many others. This only goes to show that it’s only out of stubbornness and stupidity that some have refused to understand this term and not because eco-extremists have explained themselves badly.

But hold on a second, this anonymous anarchist also doesn’t seem to have understood all of the questions that disturb them. Let’s take a look.

To start, it’s necessary to state to the anonymous author that eco-extremist attacks are NOT POLITICAL. Eco-extremism does not seek or claim any determined political positions, and thus our acts ARE NOT POLITICAL, Thus, by pure logic, its ends are not political either. Therefore, the majority of the criticisms that have to do with “virtual symbolisms,” “unleashing material actions that really affect progress,” etc. are self-refuting.

He states, “if they only attack for the sake of attacking, and they don’t seek to move past the line between virtual symbolism and unleashing in material actions that truly affect progress”.

Really eco-extremists are not looking to end civilization with their attacks, or anything of the sort. To think otherwise would be delusional, since doing that is impossible. Even if you killed all of the scientists in the world, destroying their lab and blowing up all of the bridges of the city. Not even the most destructive action can halt the advance of techno-industrial progress. In this we are extreme realists and we ask ourselves if any of our actions will stop progress and we believe that they won’t. That’s the sad reality and we have come to accept it.

On this point, we are confused as the author of the text, at coming to the same conclusion by saying, “but the structures that allow civilization to function cannot be allowed to halt one minute for fear of the citizenry. We see that after these attacks the places of exploitation will keep functioning, the machines will keep working, and if the employee dies, he will be replaced with someone else the next day,” still he criticizes the idea of disinterested attack or attack for attack’s sake. Yes, eco-extremists are pessimists and sadly we have concluded that the destruction of civilization is impossible. The only one capable of inflicting SERIOUS harm on civilization, or better to destroy it, is Wild Nature herself. So then, what is to be done? Twiddle your thumbs and wait? Watch civilization spread far and wide destroying all Wild places, without doing anything? NEVER!

Yes, eco-extremists choose disinterested attack that expects NOTHING in return: an attack in the name of Wild Nature against civilization. An attack in defense of ourselves and all that we are losing. And let it be known that they do it for the EGO trip too, for the sheer pleasure of attack, and they have no qualms admitting it. That’s why they claim responsibility for their attacks and they adopt acronyms and names for their groups.

Let it be clear: eco-extremism doesn’t pretend to try to “destroy civilization.” It does not want to “end progress.” It aims to HARM civilization, to STRIKE OUT at progress in the PRESENT and DESTABILIZE what can be destabilized. For that, eco-extremism employs indiscriminate and selective attacks, terrorism, sabotage, assassination, threats, various criminal activities, etc.

The anonymous author also writes about ISIS. He writes that the attacks of those terrorists carried out in the metro and airport in Belgium didn’t halt progress, stating, “we see that after these attacks, people don’t stop heading out to their places of exploitation, the machines don’t stop working, if an employee dies, he’s replaced by another the next day.” He’s right, of course. Progress doesn’t stop for anything. And sure, groups like ISIS want to destroy Western civilization by force to impose an Islamic civilization instead. But what does this have to do with eco-extremists?

The author continues: “While capital advances with the great strides in technological developments, and world overpopulation gets worse by the day, why should we think that attacking an innocent bystander who is bound in servitude has any effect on the advance of civilization?”

When was that ever mentioned in the communiqués of eco-extremists?

No one has ever said that attacking an innocent bystander halts the advance of civilization! Because saying that would be really dumb.

And, to be honest, we can turn that question the other way around and ask the anarchists: Why do you plant bombs in banks when the next day the insurance will cover the damage and the bank will keep functioning as if it never happened? Why plant bombs in police stations if people don’t stop becoming police afterwards? Why support anarchist prisoners if solidarity actions won’t shorten their sentences let alone free them? Why write hit pieces available in PDF format if most of the criticisms contained therein collapse under the weight of the ignorance of their anonymous authors? Why “struggle” and “heighten the contradictions”? Why anarchy then?

The anonymous author continues with his dumb questions saying: “Why have recourse to symbolic terror against the docile masses during their commute when we could be thinking about biotechnologists instead and the significant infrastructure that provides the city with energy?”

It seems that this idiot thinks that civilization is only about the electrical grid and scientists, which is obviously NOT THE CASE. Civilization also includes the neighborhood corner store. But of course that’s not eco-extremism’s target (for the time being).

Dear Mr. Anonymous, please think before you write things down, because your supposed criticisms are poorly thought-out. It’s appropriate to say that your words seem to be only “criticisms” vested with “good intentions” for the sake of  “moving discourse forward” while employing the technical language of anarchy. But really they are counterproductive defamation. And even if we don’t particularly care for confronting these sterile criticisms, we mention them without censoring them.

The anonymous author also criticizes the word “antisocial”. We eco-extremists affirm that yes, EVERYONE IS OUR ENEMY: all hyper-civilized people, the masses, the accomplice citizenry, civilization as a whole. Why, Mr. Anonymous Author, are we EXTREMISTS then? Because we advocate half-measures? It should be mentioned that if we had the power to kill off 40 million people in your region and others, annihilating the infrastructure that maintains civilization, we would do so without thinking twice about it.

The anonymous author asks as well, “Being antisocial would be any action that attacks a passerby or a worker? Or only the actions that are classified under the title of being ‘wild’?”

We respond that this is not necessarily the case. An attack that is truly antisocial is one that is carried out with an attitude of hatred, revenge, reaction, etc. against the values of society; against its symbols and its members, and it wouldn’t necessarily fall under a misanthropic attack.

And even if it appears that the author has a computer he doesn’t seem to have a dictionary. For he doesn’t quite know which definition of the world “anti-social” to employ. Since I have a dictionary right here I can help him so that he stops spewing such epic idiocies:

“Antisocial: 1 –  That which is contrary to society or harmful to it. 2- One who has difficulties with life in society or who feels repulsion to it.”

Dude, it’s that simple!

And when the anonymous author pretends to have the bull by the horns and celebrates his “victory” by deceiving himself that he has our number with his shitty criticisms, he then labels our tendency as “moralist” since he recalls the slogan that ITS used back in 2011: “Nature is the good, Civilization is evil.” Let’s remind this anarchist again that ITS has not used this slogan since beginning its new phase in 2016. If he wants to criticize stuff from five years ago, maybe it’s best that he doesn’t, because these arguments no longer apply.

ITS has not used this slogan recently, nor the term, “individual freedom”, nor used an “x” to designate the gender of words, nor returned to any of the other bad habits that were present in the first communiqués. We recommend that the author read the ITS communiqués again, and take notice this time the evolution of eco-extremism in ITS and other groups. Then he can avoid spitting out dumbass arguments that only confuse and deceive his readers.

And the dummy keeps asking, “or are we to affirm that misanthropy, hate, rebellion, or war exist in wild nature?”

We respond that NO, in wild nature there is no misanthropy, or hate, or rebellion, but there is WAR and REVENGE. We recommend that the author also spend less time in the city and more time outside of it in contact with nature. If he doesn’t, he’s probably not going to understand what we’ve written.

And in addition, without wanting to repeat ourselves, we recommend that he also learn to distinguish between “warning calls” and “threats” before saying that ITS has contradicted itself in that regard.

This concludes the first part of the response from the administrators of this blog. The second part will address reactions from Chile and Gringolandia.

Until next time.

We continue:

-(Chile) There’s no doubt that eco-extremism has been a pain in the side of many since its arrival in South America. So much so that “some” anarchist cells have staged a drama “demanding” (directly or indirectly) that all of the other anarchists excommunicate us from their “churches” for being blasphemers. These arson-committing “nuns” have taken on many names, but it’s evident that it’s the same group of assholes. They deceptively hide behind the initials of the Informal Anarchist Federation (FAI), and they issue communiqués published on various important blogs in anarchist circles. You guys know which ones we’re talking about it, don’t think we’re not going to notice! So keep on reading.

February 1st:  Note that this was only weeks after the fierce arson attack on a Transantiago bus that had all of its passengers on board in broad daylight, an attack for which ITS in its third communiqué took responsibility. This also announced the internationalization and expansion of the group. After this attack, the Paulino Scarfo Revolutionary Cell (FAI/FRI) devoted itself to anarchist business as usual in setting fire to a bank, and then issuing a boilerplate communique recording the facts of the attack, the “revolutionary reasoning” behind it which is now as sacrosanct as Christ’s cloak, and some other things for good measure. However, they deviated from the standard anarchist fare by mentioning two things that surprised us.

One of them was this:

“(herp derp) Also on the basis of this revolutionary perspective of conceiving of the confrontation with Power and Authority, we distance ourselves from all discourse that seeks to propagate indiscriminate attack and the defining of any person as a target to physically harm and kill. The unlimited source of our actions seeks to avoid collateral damage against persons who by chance are found near our targets during our operations. This understands that all planning today is according to the narrowing down of the material objective. Attack has a morality to it and is not indiscriminate. We embrace the arson but we do not share the discourse that it sought to propagate.”

For those who don’t speak “revolutionary anarchist,” here’s a translation:

 “We didn’t understand jack shit of what the eco-extremists wrote about concerning ‘Indiscriminate Attack, but it sounds ugly so we don’t agree with it because it doesn’t sound like revolution, or social war, or solidarity with prisoners, or insurrectionalism, or the FAI, or ‘againstpowerandauthority’.

Our attack on the Santander bank was an exemplary attack, that’s how it’s done folks. We teach by example.

We are morally superior since we have morals unlike those eco-extremists, but we don’t just come right out and say it because we’re cowards.

We wouldn’t know what to do if in one of our attacks, innocent people were hurt. We don’t want to judge anyone, but we’ll make an exception for that text that ITS-Chile put out taking responsibility for the incendiary attack against the Transantiago bus with people on board.”

Pretty pathetic…

The second thing that surprised us was that these anarchists are shameless (though to be honest we find that kind of admirable) in christening their “cell” with the name of Paulino Scarfó!

We laughed heartily at that, as it seems like these shit-flinging anarcho-nuns, with their insinuations and great sense of humor, have no idea what the anarchist Paulino Scarfó did in his day; that is, being a member of Di Giovani’s fierce indiscriminate gang of anarcho-bandits. These anarchists need to read more and immerse themselves in the history of the TRUE anarchists of yesteryear. We’re sure that Scarfó is turning in his grave knowing that his name has been taken up by a bunch of anarcho-Boy Scouts, who are always looking out for the citizenry and launch insinuations against the bad terrorists who don’t care about hurting people when hitting their target.

Scarfó executed many attacks, and here we will mention only one:

January 20th, 1931: Three powerful explosives were detonated at three different train stations in the subways of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Paulino Scarfó abandoned one of the bombs at the Plaza Once station. Mario Cortucci placed another bomb at the Maldonado Station of the Central Argentine Railway. And Márquez left the last explosive at Constitution station. The casualties were serious, with four dead and twenty wounded. All civilians. (Severino Di Giovani: Ideologue of Violence. Osvaldo Bayer. “Sombraysén Editores”/ PDF page 272).

Certainly more than one anarchist crosses himself when faced with this information and wholly denies that Scarfó was one of those responsible for this act that is “despicable,” “ruinous,” “similar to the acts of the Islamic State,” (as modern anarchists bloviate when faced with similar acts). Funny how this bears a resemblance to the Indiscriminate Faction’s aborted attack against the Mexico City subway in October 2015 that spooked so many anarchists. But go ahead, read Osvaldo Bayer’s book on the subject and see for yourselves that Scarfó was an indiscriminate terrorist and a TRUE anarchist. We hope that in the process you will realize that your words and hypocritical precautions for the populace are nothing but humanist garbage.

-In March, days after ITS groups published their Fifth Communique where they make public their expansion from Mexico into Chile and Argentina, the “Cell of Individualists and Anarchist Nihilists for Anti-Authoritarian Insurrection (FAI / FRI)”, after detonating an acid bomb at an auto dealership, issued a shitty communiqué which was way funnier than the other one.

They wrote:

“History, past and present, has shown us that the foundation and exercise of authority has also developed in communities that existed before the emergence of civilized life, and also it has been manifested in groups that have remained outside of civilization. That is why our struggle is essentially ANTIAUTHORITARIAN. This obligates us to distance ourselves from the self-proclaimed ‘eco-extremist tendency’ that has defended indiscriminate attack. It goes against the idea of being ‘against all authority’ and denies international solidarity in word and deed with comrades who have been imprisoned for the cause of insurrectionary anarchy.”

So to begin, we have to state, “LOLWUT?” Who wrote this? This doesn’t even seem to be

from anarchists, more like a group of priests who want to dress up the Virgin Mary in the black mantle of anarchy!

We’re going to further break down their argument. They state:

“This obligates us to distance ourselves from the self-proclaimed “eco-extremist tendency” that has defended indiscriminate attack. It goes against the idea of being “against all authority” and denies international solidarity in word and deed with comrades who have been imprisoned for the cause of insurrectionary anarchy.”

Translation:

“This obligates us as purists to not mix with the sinful eco-extremists, those who have defended blasphemy. It goes against the idea of eternal salvation, and they deny philanthropic solidarity of supporting one’s neighbor.”

It’s clear that these anarchists are so puritanical that they are beyond absurdity.

After saying that shit they continue stating:

“We’re not interested in online polemics with them. We prefer to dialogue with our comrades through action.”

That’s hysterical. They throw a rock and hide their hand behind their back instead of launching it and staying for the rest of the fight. It’s clear that these modern anarchists have nothing to do with the fierce anarchists of two centuries ago. What a pity…

Before that they wrote:

“History, past and present, has shown us that the foundation and exercise of authority has also developed in communities that existed before the emergence of civilized life, and also it has been manifested in groups that have remained outside of civilization. That is why our struggle is essentially ANTIAUTHORITARIAN.”

On this we’re not going to attempt to make them understand that not all forms of authority are harmful, since they obviously WON’T GET IT. They should think more profoundly and not remain in the old expired discourse of social criticism that they defend. It’s true that “authority” has existed in ancient ethnic groups before civilization, but it’s worth asking: Is the authority exercised by a leader of a Bushman tribe (for example), one that helps to feed them, something that is harmful?  Is the authority of the Taromenane shaman, one which cures and alleviates illnesses in his band of wild humans, something harmful? Was the authority of the great Teochichimeca warriors, who were able to take revenge against the Spanish in their day, something harmful? If you say “yes”, you’re hopeless…

You guys are so pure that surely you notice in every social circle the stain of sin… oh sorry, I meant to say, “authority.” You reject it, just like your Neonazi rivals are also so pure that they notice every stain of sin… oh, sorry again, my bad, I meant to say, “multiculturalism.” They reject it in the same manner. The only difference between you and them is the banner you defend, and nothing deeper than that.

-The last defamatory “cell” to publish its poison was the so-called, “Heriberto Salazar Pack of Saboteurs (FAI-FRI)” in May. Once we suspected that the other two “cells” were the same as this one, we stopped to analyze the communiqué, as well as profoundly think out and compare these situations. In this way, we reached two conclusions:

1.THE SUPPOSED ANARCHISTS ARE REALLY COPS:

On this communique before anything (besides making our sides hurt from so much laughing, like when they asked that people boycott our blog LOL!) , we find the origins and intentions of this document rather dubious. At least the other two communiqués took responsibility for an attack, this one didn’t. That led us to believe straight away that these people were either COPS or REPORTERS. We’re 98.99% sure of this.

We’re not just saying it to say it. Any reader with half a brain would notice something strange going on here. Reading the way they phrase things, how they mix up terms right and left, this would at least set off alarm bells for a careful reader.

*On blogs that have performed the task of spreading the poison of the police

The poisonous communique can still be found on the “Contrainformante blog”, “Voz como arma,” “Instinto Salvaje,” “Autistici-Cruz Negra” (Italian translation), and “325” (English translation) (for whoever wants to read it). You could have found it as well on the super-blog, “CONTRAINFO” until they realized that they made a mistake and then deleted it. The other blog, like the sheep they deny being, took it as being authentic on the basis of having been published on the “reliable source” Contrainfo (ha!), just as the “preliminary note” says on the Spanish blog, “Voz como arma”:

“I republish from Contra Info this communiqué signed by the Heriberto Salazar Pack of Saboteurs – FAI / FRI, which criticizes from some place in Chile the so-called, ‘eco-extremist tendency’. In particular, the issues center on indiscriminate attack, and the distinct insults and threats from these factions against the wider anarchist scene.”

It seems that these dumb sheep dressed in wolves’ clothing have fell hook, line, and sinker for the words of this “Pack” of police. All the latter had to do was start saying bad things about eco-extremism, as some time ago the same people decided to publish the communiqués of Reacción Salvaje (for example) and say in their boring “preliminary notes” that they didn’t agree with the texts but they did agree with the attacks. Thus we ask, why did you publish the RS communiqués if you didn’t agree with them? That’s a sign of your negligent “positivity”, your solicitous and promiscuous attitude, a lack of analysis and your suffocating inclusive modus operandi. Then we noticed again that you call yourselves, “Voz con arma (Voice with Weapon), with good reason because your words are toxic and they can be used as a biological weapon.

The fact that Contrainfo deleted the suspicious communqiue confirms for us the doubts as to the origin of the text, and that we aren’t just being paranoid.

What a shame that these “important” blogs within militant virtual circles, which make “important” interventions for “libertarian theory and praxis,” don’t have any filters and publish any shit that pretends to be or is signed by FAI-FRI even when it’s actually COPS or REPRORTERS who wrote it. What a shame that they can’t distinguish “critical comments” from poison like that.

The police are so obliging that you mistake them for comrades? But you aren’t so obliging with the eco-extremists, since those at “Contrainfo” didn’t publish the Seventh Communique of ITS nor the Indiscriminate Faction’s communiqué taking responsibility for the assassination of the IPN computer science student, or the presentation of the now-defunct “Tierra Maldita” blog (which should be mentioned was sent multiple times). And for obvious reasons you probably won’t publish this either. Nevertheless it’ll be in the inbox of Contrainfo as well as the other blogs (wink).  We get why they haven’t published the latest eco-extremist texts, since we looked over again their “Conditions for publication”, and one of the points reads, “only that which conforms to limits of decency and respect for human dignity, personal information, equality of the sexes and of all human beings will be published.”

Eco-extremists definitely are neither decent nor do they respect the humanist values that are implied in that condition, and they spit on the equality of the sexes. That is to say that eco-extremists have been “EXCOMMUNICATED” by Contrainfo!

We’re not saying that they have to publicize the controversial words and acts of eco-extremists just because they are emailed to them or they have to do it by force. No, but for fuck’s sake, everything signed “FAI/FRI” is published without even reading it? That’s a damn shame, because it would seem that any idiot who wants to stir up shit in a communiqué will have a place to do it in the blogs of “counterinformation” if they just stick as “FAI/FRI” at the end of it. What a bunch of dumbass motherfuckers!

It’s sad that they are so bewitched by those acronyms, which are important to many anarchos, that they are manipulated by people coming out of the woodwork who want to poison the well of many radical circles.

Sure, anyone can make the mistake of publishing such idiocies as those of this “Pack”, but the thing is that they won’t even fess up to doing it, at the very least. It’s to be expected that, if they fuck up publicly, they can at least admit that they made a mistake, right?

*Does this type of anarchist remember anything?

A similar story occurred some months ago, the same thing but with a few changed details.

This was the supposed criticism that was signed by the “Colectivo Libre Observador (CLO). Some will remember this, if not, we will refresh your memories.

The campaign of the “Black December” having ended, CLO published a defamatory communiqué entitled, “Criticism of the Gray December”. In this communiqué the CLO came out of the militant campaign sowing doubts and distrust in anarchist circles. At the end of it they expressed their doubts and also invited various “comrades” to question the actions of other groups, among them the “Kapibara Group”, a group of fierce eco-anarchists who we sympathize with. In other words, they wanted to point the finger at these groups accusing them of being “cops”.

On the scene then arrived the again the anarcho-pleasers who administer the “Instinto Salvaje” and Contrainformante” blogs. With the same incompetence and unwillingness to read or analyze what comes to them or what they publish, they uploaded the CLO text on their sites. This created a series of discussions, criticisms, and polemics within anarchist circles, the same as what is happening now with the stuff from the “Pack”.

A group called “Uncivilized Southerners” published its own sharp polemic against the CLO entitled, “Against the Calumnies of Civil Anarchism”, which concludes as follows:

“We believe that this defamation against this group also attacks those individuals who embrace eco-extremist practices against civilization and progress. These are having increasing relevance in the lands of the south with the emergence of various individuals opposing technology. These idiotic words (halfway down) by the “free thought collective” show nothing more than their fear at the heightening of the conflict. They assume the role of defaming all that is not in accord with their anarchist principles, while labeling as ‘terrorist’ all those who diverge from their ideal (though ‘terrorist’ is a compliment in our eyes.)”

They should know that the war against civilization and its supporters will not cease, on the contrary, we will make sure that our acts horrify those who continue to defend the ideals of justice and social equality, as well as those who defend anarchism. Here we make a distinction between that and anarchy itself.

We are putting the pressure on so that the conflict takes a continually extremist direction in the name of all that is wild. We will ensure that the ideas and acts of ecological radicals spread and continue in the southern lands.”

It was a surprise to many when this same group (Uncivilized Southerners) took responsibility for the attack on the Transantiago bus, adopting the acronym “ITS”, in an internationalization of the eco-extremist project into South America.

Other anarchists who took positions against the CLO were “Sin Banderas Ni Fronteras”, who issued their own communiqué entitled, “On Black December and police tactics to poison us with doubts and distrust,” in which they wrote:

“No one in these months has issued ‘reflections’ which have come from those addresses. However, the blog, ‘Instinto Salvaje’ and the Facebook page, ‘Contrainformante,’ published the text, ‘Against the Gray December” and opened the door for validating those who have been sending the calumnies and detractions previously mentioned. Instinto Salvaje retracted the text from their blog, probably since people pointed these things out and criticized various counterinformation projects, including the one to which we are presently writing.”

Thus when we write, “the ones (Instinto Salvaje and the Contrainformante blog) with the same idiocy and lack of reading comprehension of what they read or of what comes to them,” we aren’t mistaken, since these two already have a history of not checking the texts that come to them, allowing this poison to spread in radical circles.

And in this case, the same thing happened with the “Pack”. They got wind of the dispute between the anarchos and the eco-extremists, and used it to spread their defamatory message by taking advantage of the lack of reading comprehension and ignorance of eco-extremist texts (a common trait shared by many anarchos). This meant that more than one of them would fall for these lies and even sympathize with the shit that the “Pack” was spewing, as one can read in the “Voz como arma” page.

Those of the “Sin Banderas Ni Fronteras” affirmed the following in their previously mentioned text:

“Already in 2012 the ex – Chief of the National Intelligence Agency of Chile, Gonzalo Youseff, announced that they had begun a campaign of ‘poisoning’ due to their difficulties in infiltrating anarchist cells. He stated:

‘Among the departmental techniques to inhibit political violence are collaboration with police, increased hostility from the judiciary… and internal poisoning by spreading distorted information given to anarchist cells so that, for example, distrust is spread among their members’. (Gonzalo Youssef in an interview with the newspaper, “La Segunda,” December 2012)”

Let’s remember that the police paint all “radicals” with the same brush: anarchists, feminists, occupiers, eco-extremists, etc. For them, we’re all the same. They use this strategy to counter those who seek to undermine societal order, no matter what ideological orientation they claim. It’s a pity that those who are in charge of publicizing actions on anarchist blogs don’t get that this is what is going on. Through their negligence they end up assisting the police in spreading their poison in radical circles as the author of the above cited text indicates. We also feel pity for the cell that issued its polemic against the eco-extremists (the ones who attacked the La Cisterna bank), which was cited by the poisonous communiqué of the Pack.

To conclude this point, we will mention the last paragraph of that same text:

“To conclude, the problem isn’t that the police or dumb people send fake messages to try to deceive us. Today it could be ‘Libre Observador’ and ‘Rodrigo Opazo,’ but tomorrow it could be another message with the same intentions.”

2.THE “PACK” ARE ANARCHISTS OF THE MOST “RADICAL” TYPE:

Or maybe they really are anarchists (who act like police or reporters) who wrote that communiqué and we are just being paranoid. And knowing that there are anarchists who are very close to these positions, as well as the fact that various anarchist blogs have published their communiqué without reservation, and it’s still up on their sites today, we should take them at their word. We will examine this position below.

*Analysis

We thus proceed to review the communiqué that this “Pack” issued. They wrote:

“(Herp derp) These are so-called eco-extremists who shout coolly ‘death to anarchy’ thus disowning their own origins and formation, the idea following which they used to take nourishment from the warriors of the urban guerrilla of the past and the present, and then they went on to emphasize certain aspects that have always been within anarchy and its struggle for the liberation of humans, our brothers the animals and the earth.”

First of all, eco-extremists have NEVER stated or indicated that we support the defamatory slogan, “death to anarchy” (death to civil anarchism, SURE). Maybe the members of the “Pack” were stoned or drunk when they read something about eco-extremism and that’s what they understood. That seems far more likely of an explanation.

They say that we deny our anarchist roots, something that is false since eco-extremists have always at every opportunity pointed out anarchists who we identify with in the past and the present. We’ve never denied our start as eco-anarchists, and on the contrary, we are proud that we came out of that scene. The thing is that we have made our own path out of it.

This “Pack” of stoners wants to damage our relationship with the few anarchist to which we maintain some affinity. That’s not going to happen, since TRUE anarchists can read the bad intentions of the “Pack” which only have the potential of getting either our people or theirs thrown in prison.

They continue:

 “Being extraneous to the constant tension we want to keep and to our struggle to make anarchy alive, a certain self-proclaimed eco-extremist sector is throwing away the libertarian ideal that manifests itself in the insurrectional struggle.”

If the ideas of the “Pack” defends are to poison our relations, talk shit, and then hide behind the “FAI/FRI” designation, and these symbolize the “libertarian ideal”, for certain we’ll toss these in a trash heap so that we can spit, piss, and shit on them as appropriate.

Continuing:

 “A certain small group linked to the imaginary category of ‘symbolic populations’ and musical/countercultural university areas (they disown university but they attend it… and they study the subjects they hate so much), despise the human animal and therefore see the enemy everywhere.”

What the hell is this? Is this an accusation? This paragraph is irrefutable evidence that the “Pack” is a police front that is trying to get some benefit out of the “dispute” between some isolated anarchists and eco-extremists, in order to strike out at the terrorists or whoever.

If these anarcho-police want to look for the eco-extremists in the universities, let them look. For certain we’re studying nanotechnology or communications in order to work on NatGeo Wild, that’s for sure.

In order to point out more groups, the “Pack” states:

“7 years after Mauricio Morales went away we greet warmly the Manada de Choque Anarquico Nihilista for their cool and intelligent insurrectional actions during the demos of May 1 and April 21, when they gave yet another proof of the importance of the coordination between people in affinity.”

What does MCAN have to do with any of that?

In conclusion they state:

 “We also greet the warriors of the Célula Revolucionaria Paulino Scarfó (FAI-FRI), who in their claim of an attack on the Banco Santander in La Cisterna wrote: ‘Attack has its ethics and is not indiscriminate; we embrace incendiary actions and we don’t agree with what is being said around.’

It should be remembered (again) that the CRPS (FAI-FRI) was the first “cell” in this block of three “cells” that directly and indirectly positioned themselves against the eco-extremist attacks. They should be thanked for drawing the attention of the security forces of the State (which they hate so much) on this “dispute. No doubt the police will greatly benefit from all of this.

The responsibility of all of this has been on both sides: our responsibility as we have responded to them, and the responsibility of those who have published the calumnies of the “Pack”. But the people who got the ball rolling were there anarcho-cops. It should be remembered that when you play with fire you will get burned.

This is the first and the last time that as Maldición Eco-extremista we comment so extensively on this shit. We don’t want to give more fodder for more confrontations nor acknowledge the acts of the most puritan anarchists of the southern part of the continent. Or keep responding to the trolling of police playing anarchists. This latter action was necessary to make themselves visible in virtual anarchist circles where there are few who are truly analytical. It could even be said that intelligent anarchists with a publication project are an endangered species, such as those few who did not publish the “Pack’s” communiqué knowing what we have described above. Many pages of “counterinformation” fell for the trap, even those of similar ideological trajectory in foreign countries (325, CAN-Italy, etc.). The latter sites don’t know anything about this shit and were tripped up by their own ignorance. But here we say that they were just as culpable as the Spanish language “counterinformation” sites.

We also recall here the whole past drama back in 2011 when ITS began to publish its communiqués publicizing its terrorist actions in Mexico. At that time, many anarchists in the region were beside themselves once they found out about the situation. They couldn’t believe that a group like that could exist. Many blogs just ignored ITS (in particular, saboteamos.info), and a bunch of anarcho-Zapatistas even made a video where they drew the conclusion doubting the existence of the eco-extremist group. They stated in particular that ITS was a “front group” created by the Mexican army, that they were fascists, that they were agent-provocateurs of the PRI (the governing party) and the CIA to unleash repression on the poor “social movements.” They also stated that ITS was an “anti-anarchist group of the left” and a bunch of other laughable things. In their exasperated reasoning and desperation for someone to believe them, they were almost to the point of saying that ITS was a puppet group of alien reptiles trying to take over the world (?) They said many things at that time, but ITS always responded with attacks and by continuing the project up to this day. That is the situation as it plays itself out in Chile, Argentina, the United States, business as usual…

Thus, having thoroughly gone over and exposed the supposed “critique” of the “Pack”, we conclude by asking these anarcho-cops: What did you think you would gain by this communiqué? It doesn’t scare us. Do you think it will make the Eco-extremists stop their attacks? Do you hope to demoralize us and that we retreat? That’s not going to happen. It’s true that the poisoning of the anarchist milieu took place just as the ex-chief of the National Intelligence Agency of Chile predicted, thanks in large part to the same anarchists who have fallen for it because certain “counterinformation” sites have dropped the ball. Before this situation all that there is left to do is be intelligent, sniff things out and be aware of the enemy dressed up as a critic. Some anarchists have shown themselves to be imprudent and have jumped to erroneous conclusions. They are unable to recognize their mistakes which is why they are bogged down in the mire in which they find themselves.

We are certain that some of the publishers of these “blogs” will read what we wrote above and reflect on this situation and their role in it. Others will double down and continue to swallow the poison that comes down to them from the “spheres of power” (putting it in terms that they can understand).

-(Gringolandia) Speaking concretely, we can divide the criticisms of the “yanquis” into various groupings. The most significant for our purposes is the response from U.S. anarcho-primitivism, which has a broader influence on eco-radical circles. Specifically, John Zerzan has accused eco-extremism of being “nihilist” and “postmodernist”. “Nihilist” presents us with no problems whatsoever since we have nihilist buddies, specifically in Italy, and we’re proud of our affiliation with them. But leaving aside that particular calumny, Zerzan excommunicates eco-extremism for its use of indiscriminate attack and its lack of respect for leftist values. These values have a special place in the heart of the old hippy even though he proclaims himself to be “post-left”. His leftism is anything but “post-”. According to Zerzan, we have to have “hope” that 7 billion people will unite in one accord to dismantle the economic, political, and social system that sustains their existence, and that they will do this more or less peacefully. (“The future primitive”) But in pointing out that this is an impossible fairy tale, we are condemned as “nihilists” (as if that word was offensive to us, LOL!) and cast out of the flock of U.S. green anarchism, with all of its resources and professional websites (we mention here Anarchist News among others).

In the end, Zerzan wants to destroy civilization in the physical realm without destroying the values on which it is based. This really means that no one will do anything save for supporting the same mischief of anarchist kids with Daddy issues, and any act of resistance amounts to the same “creative destruction” that is characteristic of any given civilization.

Civilization destroys Wild Nature, sure, but you still have to respect the concepts of innocence and guilt, morality and solidarity because… well to tell the truth we don’t know why. Of course, you can question language and “symbolic thought” (as Zerzan and his acolytes do) but civilized morality is sacrosanct for them.

Then we have the phlegmatic U.S. nihilists. The ones who are cooler than anyone else, the popular kids of the class, who reject all action a priori since they don’t want to make a mistake and by that be considered “moralists” or anything like that. We applaud their egoism, but we are a bit confused as to why their nihilism always ends up doing nothing, supporting nothing, but criticizing everything. It should be mentioned that some even support eco-extremism (with reservations, of course). Maybe one day they’ll even pass over to our side, little by little. All we can say now is that, for being such nihilists, they sure have the certainty to be super-critical of everything that crosses their path. If they really believe in nothing, maybe they can leave us alone, right?  Or is it the case that they wear their nihilism like designer clothing which makes them special snowflakes but means nothing more than producing books that change nothing, but hey, it sure feels good publishing them…

In general, we don’t know if we are translating things into Mandarin instead of English, because it seems that people up there are only reading what they think we are saying, and not what we are really saying. It’s almost as if the “hard sayings” traumatize people since they don’t square with the modern liberal mind (we mean “liberal” here in the classical sense). Just to be clear: we eco-extremists aren’t searching for reasons to attack, because we don’t need them. If you need them, you’re part of the problem and not the solution. Your needing a “reason” is domestication if it’s anything at all. And eco-extremists already know that trying to find ways to include the masses in what we do is a waste of time. That the anarchists rack their brains trying to include them in a “winning strategy” perplexes us to no end. If history teaches us anything, it’s that the masses will never change the world. If that’s the case, does that mean you’re going to stay home and twiddle your thumbs because nothing can be done? Are you going to wait for the masses’ or democracy’s permission to attack?

The strategy of attack in the here and now comes from the premise that society does not exist nor can it, at least how anarchists conceive it. In truth, society is merely a grouping of confused human animals dominated by interlocking webs of power with the aim of augmenting human power as an end unto itself. In that sense, these human animals are only “talking tools” in this process. Collective agency, as Chahta-Ima points out in one of his essays, is an illusion. What’s more, to try to spread ideas like “liberation” or whatever other stupidity in the masses is trying to destroy the machine with its own logic. In these attempts, the machine always wins. The machine has ways of transforming any given project for “liberation” into a method of strengthening domestication against Nature.

Thus, eco-extremists don’t care about society, and only take it into consideration to the extent that it is destroyed under its own weight or by entropy. We are on entropy’s side. Civilization with its ideas about equality and self-determination don’t impress us. If you don’t want to use the term “Nature” here you can use “entropy” or “chaos” instead, they’re all the same thing. All civilized order is a threat to Nature: that’s the way it is, it’s always been this way, and it always will be. From the cradle, we are trained to love that which isn’t good for us, to do things we don’t want to do, and think things that are foreign to our interests. We applaud any behavior that attacks that slavery; domestication in which the animal, the plant, the forest, and the river don’t exist for themselves but rather are manipulated to serve the Idea of Civilization: of control, security, innovation, progress, and, (why not?) liberty, equality, and fraternity. For us, the love of specific wild places with which some of us have an extensive personal relationship, but also the wildness within ourselves, the complete rejection of domestication and society, all of these are the only things that we hold dear. What’s more, they are the reason behind our rage which leads to the indiscriminate war against society.

The reality is that eco-extremism is expanding. From a tendency that only existed in North America, it has spread into South America, and allied Nihilist Terrorist groups are multiplying in Europe.

Because Nihilist Eco-Extremism is not only the explosives of ITS in Mexico, Chile, and Argentina; not only the bullets of the Indiscriminate Faction piercing the brain of the techno-geek; not only the nonchalant terrorist attitude of the “Guamera Eco-Extremist War”; not only the polemical words of Revista Regresión and Chahta-Ima; not only the Indiscriminate Attacks of the Memento Mori Nihilist Sect in Italy; not only the translations of “Místico y Maldito”, “Nechayevshchina,” “Palmer Amaranth,” and others… no. Eco-extremism is the armed resistance of Amazon tribes in their war against the logging, oil, and mining industries; it is the arrows of isolated tribesman fired at helicopters in Africa; it is the continuation of pagan belief which resists total Christianization; it is the resistance of the individual against domestication manifested in criminal activities;  it is the tornado, the earthquake, the fierceness of the last coyotes, the hostility of elephants, the bee who stings and lets loose her stinger before dying. Eco-extremism is the violent defense of the same Wild Nature: her reaction, her answer, her power.

You can jail, finger, defame, or even kill all of us eco-extremists as well as all of the Nihilist Terrorists who have declared themselves our allies, but the War will continue, even if under another name, or even as something nameless…

We end with these words of a known and controversial imprisoned anarchist whose name needs no mentioning. We recall here his powerful words to demonstrate that the era of “good feelings” has ended, and that killing and terrorist indiscriminate violence against civilization is now underway:

 “To those critics, judges without gavels who judge and criticize those who entered that church, I send my infinite hatred. From here and not from anonymity I say that I consider them my enemies. They are the same as those who sat in judgment (if not exactly the same) against those who put planted an explosive device in a house in the La Reina neighborhood in 2011 (which unfortunately didn’t explode), and that threatened to blow up a school. The same as those who sat in judgment of an action in Macul con Grecia in 2013, where they threw Molotov cocktails at a Transantiago bus that ran their barricade and where people from the bus were “affected” by the vengeful and beautiful fire. They are as idiotic as those who claimed to be the “Macul Blockade” arguing that those who attacked the bus weren’t the real blockade, ha! For sure some miserable university folks criticized. They are the same as those who criticize / criticized (even from other parts of the world) the bomb in the Metro Military School in 2014, where many bystanders were wounded and a woman “suffered” the amputation of her fingers; and some months later she would parade her mutilated hand on television. They are the same as the judges who cried for the death of those who lit a bank on fire during a demonstration in Greece, which resulted in the bank being reduced to ashes with three workers inside. We could go on giving a thousand more examples. I shit and piss on all of those judges without gavels. I expect for the common citizenry that an infinite number of bombs explode among them, since “filthy citizen life is not only found in the barracks.” I am against civilization and in the citizenry / humanity I find the most civilized target (myself included).  These are the ones clinging to progress and who devote themselves to destroying the untamed, all for the filthy and disgusting plastic called money.

Long live individuality! Strength to those who conspire!”

 

In the spirit of attack:

Maldición Eco-extremista

Öme Archival Group

Místico y Maldito

Chahta-Ima

Yoloxochitl